Op 18 apr. 2013, om 14:08 heeft Lennart Poettering het
volgende geschreven:
> On Thu, 18.04.13 09:26, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>
>> So it returns something that could be considered usefull on my laptop, but
>> the output on the beaglebone is useless. On ARM you need to kn
Greetings, I hope this issue is familiar to someone here. I wrote a
unit file for a service called "wsgw". It starts fine with `systemctl
start wsgw`, and `systemctl enable wsgw` goes smoothly, but the service
doesn't start on boot.
My only diagnostic so far has been running `systemctl statu
Heya!
Many fixes, some additions, and a lot of (experimental) kdbus
work. kdbus is coming along nicely, BTW.
http://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/systemd-202.tar.xz
CHANGES WITH 202:
* The output of 'systemctl list-jobs' got some polishing. The
'--type=' argument may no
On Thu, 18.04.13 09:41, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
> From: Harald Hoyer
>
> If the key file cannot be accessed, we can at least ask for the
> password.
Looks good! Applied! (I didn't test it though, but I hope you did? ;-))
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:32 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
> libsystemd-audit needs functions from libsystemd-shared, so
> libsystemd-audit needs to appear first. Otherwise:
>
> CCLD systemd-logind
> ./.libs/libsystemd-audit.a(audit.o): In function `audit_session_from_pid':
> /home/josh/src/system
libsystemd-audit needs functions from libsystemd-shared, so
libsystemd-audit needs to appear first. Otherwise:
CCLD systemd-logind
./.libs/libsystemd-audit.a(audit.o): In function `audit_session_from_pid':
/home/josh/src/systemd/src/shared/audit.c:50: undefined reference to
`detect_container
On 04/10/2013 12:03 PM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Hi,
I have a bit of a heisenbug where dropbear.socket will just die and needs a
systemctl restart dropbear.socket. I can't tell why it's dying, just that it
does within 3 days of uptime. After restarting it it seems to be rock solid
again for at least
On Thu, 18.04.13 14:40, Henrik Grindal Bakken (h...@ifi.uio.no) wrote:
> This patch adds --disable-tests to configure. It is based on a patch
> posted by Thierry Reding in 2010. The motivation for adding it is that
> some tests fail link-time when cross-compiling.
>
> The patch adds a new Makef
On Thu, 18.04.13 16:38, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote:
> Am 18.04.2013 16:04, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> > That said, screen should probably set up a new PAM session of its own
> > and detach from the original one.
>
> That sounds like a good idea - unfortunately, screen does not
Am 18.04.2013 16:04, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> That said, screen should probably set up a new PAM session of its own
> and detach from the original one.
That sounds like a good idea - unfortunately, screen does not seem to
have PAM session support at all, and I couldn't find the obvious place
On Thu, 18.04.13 08:46, Harald Hoyer (har...@redhat.com) wrote:
> > Then, the whole PID file story looks like a mess to me anyway, modern
> > daemons should not use PID files anyway... Even more, making them
> > configurable sounds really wrong. If this is about allowing
> > instantiation, then pe
On Thu, 18.04.13 09:28, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
> > And if the somebody invokes shutdown() on the listening socket (not the
> > connection socket), but that's a really weird thing to do. But people do
> > weird things, and this has occured before.
> >
> > Otherwise I have no
On 04/17/2013 04:16 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Wed, 17.04.13 16:08, Mark Hounschell (ma...@compro.net) wrote:
That looks OK. Can you try the logger thing I suggested? That should
tell us if the transition works at all...
Sorry, I had a dentist Apt.
Uh, I put this as the first command i
Okey, okey, you are right. Don't add ARCH to os-release
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
This patch adds --disable-tests to configure. It is based on a patch
posted by Thierry Reding in 2010. The motivation for adding it is that
some tests fail link-time when cross-compiling.
The patch adds a new Makefile variable -- manual_tests -- and uses
that instead of noinst_PROGRAMS. However
On Thu, 18.04.13 09:26, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
> So it returns something that could be considered usefull on my laptop, but
> the output on the beaglebone is useless. On ARM you need to know the
> following to see if you can execute the binary:
>
> 1) instruction set revi
]] Koen Kooi
> But it does answer the "can I nspawn into this rootfs?" question for
> different architectures like powerpc vs x86 :)
No, it doesn't. You'll have false negatives, think about binfmt_misc
combined with qemu user emulation for instance.
The right way to see if you can do that is t
On 18/04/13 01:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 08.04.13 20:08, John Lane (syst...@jelmail.com) wrote:
I'm trying out the new foobar.service.d way of overriding unit files.
I thought that I'd be able to have a number of service instances
that were overridden differently but that does not
Hi,
If one executes:
$ sudo systemctl enable getty@tty1.service
ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service'
'/etc/systemd/system/getty.target.wants/getty@tty1.service'
and then you decide to override getty@.service:
$ sudo cp /usr/lib/systemd/system/getty@.service
/etc/systemd/system/getty@.
From: Harald Hoyer
If the key file cannot be accessed, we can at least ask for the
password.
---
Remove access() call and check the return value of
crypt_activate_by_keyfile_offset()
src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/cryptsetup/cryptsetup
Op 17 apr. 2013, om 21:05 heeft Lennart Poettering het
volgende geschreven:
> On Wed, 10.04.13 19:03, Koen Kooi (k...@dominion.thruhere.net) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a bit of a heisenbug where dropbear.socket will just die and
>> needs a systemctl restart dropbear.socket. I can't tell why
Op 17 apr. 2013, om 20:19 heeft Lennart Poettering het
volgende geschreven:
> On Mon, 08.04.13 22:09, Askar Safin (safinas...@mail.ru) wrote:
>
>>
>>> I'm not sure what problem the proposal is trying to solve. Maybe it'd
>>> be clearer if that was provided.
>> I want to know what is the arch
22 matches
Mail list logo
