Hi systemd experts,
I have a question about the dependence of user and system session. At system
session, there is a service which need to be started after X(user session).
At first I added "After=xorg.target" at this service, but It is said that the
dependence of cross session is not work. Is t
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 09:18:34AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>>
>> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 03:27:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> > I've h
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 09:18:34AM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> > On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 03:27:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> >>
> >> > Hi,
> >> > I've hit a bit of a problem with nsenter and systemd-
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
> On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 03:27:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> > I've hit a bit of a problem with nsenter and systemd-nspawn.
>> > When nsenter is used to enter the PID namespace created with
>> > sy
On Fri, 19.04.13 22:01, Peter Li (chinasau...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On 04/19/2013 04:16 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
> >>When I then run `systemctl start wsgw; systemctl status wsgw` I get:
> >>
> >> wsgw.service - WebSockets Gateway for pianod
> >> Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/syst
nsenter would kill(self, SIGSTOP) when the child was stopped,
making it possible to use 'suspend -f' in the child shell to
suspend both the shell and the parent nsenter process. Unfortunately
this interferes with other uses of SIGSTOP, since nsenter process
is not visible in the child PID namespace
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 03:27:46PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've hit a bit of a problem with nsenter and systemd-nspawn.
> > When nsenter is used to enter the PID namespace created with
> > systemd-nspawn, and the container's init attempt
Am 21.04.2013 16:13, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> On Sun, 21.04.13 16:04, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>> why is the Main PID process below truncated?
>
>> Main PID: 65508 (/usr/sbin/postg)
>
> because that is the "comm" process name of the process, i.e. the name
> "top" s
On Sun, 21.04.13 16:04, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> why is the Main PID process below truncated?
> Main PID: 65508 (/usr/sbin/postg)
because that is the "comm" process name of the process, i.e. the name
"top" shows, rather than the name "ps" shows. The "comm" name is
maintai
why is the Main PID process below truncated?
_
[root@testserver:~]$ which systemctl
alias systemctl='/bin/systemctl --no-pager --full'
/bin/systemctl
[root@testserver:~]$ systemctl status postgrey.service
postgrey.service - Postfix Greylisti
On Sat, 20.04.13 15:27, Eric W. Biederman (ebied...@xmission.com) wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> > Hi,
> > I've hit a bit of a problem with nsenter and systemd-nspawn.
> > When nsenter is used to enter the PID namespace created with
> > systemd-nspawn, and the container's init
On Sun, 21.04.13 10:53, Kevin Wilson (wkev...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello, systemd developers,
>
> I have a short question about "name=systemd" cgroup mount option.
>
> Would systemd work without specifying this mount option ?
No. This mount option is what tells the kernel to create an independen
Hello, systemd developers,
I have a short question about "name=systemd" cgroup mount option.
Would systemd work without specifying this mount option ?
what is the reason for using this cgroup mount option ?
regards,
Kevin
___
systemd-devel mailing list
13 matches
Mail list logo
