Re: [systemd-devel] Sprint/Hackfest at Linux Plumbers Conference?

2013-06-06 Thread David Strauss
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 10:15 PM, David Strauss wrote: > I'll be especially interested if we can work for three or four of the hacking > days. To clarify, I mean if systemd developers are hacking together for at least three of the days. -- David Strauss | da...@davidstrauss.net | +1 512 57

Re: [systemd-devel] Sprint/Hackfest at Linux Plumbers Conference?

2013-06-06 Thread David Strauss
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > We'll also have a hackfest at GUADEC in Brno, btw. I'm looking into my travel options right now. I'll be especially interested if we can work for three or four of the hacking days. > As I know the LPC folks it should be fairly easy gett

Re: [systemd-devel] build problems without largefile support

2013-06-06 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
El 06/06/13 04:39, Lennart Poettering escribió: On Thu, 06.06.13 10:10, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: The constants for T/P/E don't fit in a 23bit off_t. That's why largefile was introduced in the first place. I'm not sure how to fix this. Maybe just use 'ifdef' and not sup

Re: [systemd-devel] shell / systemd config files

2013-06-06 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
В Thu, 6 Jun 2013 08:53:40 +0200 Lennart Poettering пишет: > On Mon, 20.05.13 10:28, James Buren (r...@ymail.com) wrote: > > > Files such as /etc/machine-info have an incompatibility with systemd in > > regards to how > > it writes and/or parses them. Take the following sample: > > > > PRETTY_

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd debugging option, documentation clarification

2013-06-06 Thread Andrey Borzenkov
В Thu, 6 Jun 2013 10:03:29 +0200 Lennart Poettering пишет: > On Wed, 15.05.13 22:28, John Connor (jaconno...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > 1: It would be useful for debugging if systemctl had an option to show > > output on the screen (especially output from scripts run under > > systemd), rather than

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: kill processes with SIGKILL on watchdog failure

2013-06-06 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 09:13:48AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 21.05.13 15:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > > > > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10:55PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > > Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-cgroups-agent failed to get dbus connection

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 07.05.13 09:31, Ross Lagerwall (rosslagerw...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I have noticed sometimes during shutdown, the following message appears > on screen twice: > systemd-cgroups-agent failed to get dbus connection: failed to connect > to socket /org/freedesktop/systemd/private connec

Re: [systemd-devel] Masking systemd-journal-flush and setting journal storage to persistent

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 07.05.13 13:15, Umut Tezduyar (u...@tezduyar.com) wrote: > Hi, > > No worries. Maybe you want to add systemd-journal-flush.service to > man systemd-journald. I have now added a TODO list item, so that we don't forget to properly document systemd-journal-flush.service. Lennart -- Lenna

Re: [systemd-devel] Patch for Smack labelling support in udev

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 08.05.13 11:16, Reshetova, Elena (elena.reshet...@intel.com) wrote: > Hi, > > This is the patch for review for enabling smack labelling for device nodes. > > The functionality and reasoning is inside. I will be happy to answer any > questions. So, this needs some HAVE_SMACK ifdeffery a

Re: [systemd-devel] Patch to show systemd & generators

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 14.05.13 08:59, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Would you be interested in a patch that shows "Systemd + Generators" or > >> maybe only "Generators"? > > > > Well, I guess it makes sense to show how much time is spent in the > > generators and how much time is spent in

Re: [systemd-devel] Sprint/Hackfest at Linux Plumbers Conference?

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 15.05.13 12:42, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: > I'd definitely like to do one, and I assume we'll have the systemd > leads on site. Should I contact the LPC folks directly? Sounds like a good idea. We'll also have a hackfest at GUADEC in Brno, btw. As I know the LPC folks

Re: [systemd-devel] build problems without largefile support

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 06.06.13 10:10, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > > The constants for T/P/E don't fit in a 23bit off_t. That's why largefile > > was introduced in the first place. > > I'm not sure how to fix this. Maybe just use 'ifdef' and not support those > > formats? > > Humm, so i

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd fails to build with static kmod library

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 04.06.13 14:44, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote: > El 04/06/13 04:39, Lennart Poettering escribió: > >On Mon, 03.06.13 00:52, Stephan Raue (mailingli...@openelec.tv) wrote: > > > >> > >>Am 02.06.2013 19:36, schrieb Greg KH: > >>>On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:28:57PM +0200,

Re: [systemd-devel] build problems without largefile support

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 16.05.13 08:49, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to compile systemd with "--disable-largefile" and I got this: > [...] > src/shared/util.c: In function 'parse_bytes': > src/shared/util.c:2270:17: error: overflow in implicit constant conversion > [-Werro

Re: [systemd-devel] Systemd debugging option, documentation clarification

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 15.05.13 22:28, John Connor (jaconno...@gmail.com) wrote: > 1: It would be useful for debugging if systemctl had an option to show > output on the screen (especially output from scripts run under > systemd), rather than dumping it in a journal which you then have to > search through. This

Re: [systemd-devel] Trusting systemd vs. trusting daemons

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 18.05.13 02:18, David Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:39 PM, Aaron Faanes wrote: > > So my question, simply, is this: Should I prefer running a process as > > root knowing that it chroots itself, or should I run it as non-root > > and chroot it via

Re: [systemd-devel] System units packaging and rpmlint

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 19.05.13 11:10, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > В Sat, 18 May 2013 23:50:52 -0700 > David Strauss пишет: > > > > > > - some package install directly file in /usr/lib/systemd/system/*.wants > > > There is some special case ( like plymouth ), but usually, that > > > should

Re: [systemd-devel] System units packaging and rpmlint

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 18.05.13 23:44, Michael Scherer (m...@zarb.org) wrote: > Hi, > > After the last discussion on fedora-devel about boot times[1], I have > been looking at the various units on my disk and if I could code > something in rpmlint ( tool to verify a rpm against a set of guidelines > ) to have p

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: kill processes with SIGKILL on watchdog failure

2013-06-06 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 21.05.13 15:27, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 12:10:55PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > Just calling service_enter_dead() does not kill any processes. > > As a result, the old process may still be running when the new one is > > star