On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 7:11 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Dec 21, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>
>> Trimming should be the job of the filesystem, not for a nasty cron
>> job. We do not want to support legacy filesystems with upstream
>> shipped systemd units.
>>
>> Also, util-linux must
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
The first seven patches fix a few issues with the current code.
Patch 09 adds DHCP lease renewing support when timer T1 triggers. Using
the UDP socket sending implementation in patch 08, the DHCP lease
ren
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:23 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 20.12.13 16:35, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 05:16:11PM +0200, Patrik Flykt wrote:
>> > This also fixes a minor indentation damage.
>> > ---
>> > src/libsystemd-dhcp/dhcp-n
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Patrik Flykt
wrote:
> The first seven patches fix a few issues with the current code.
>
> Patch 09 adds DHCP lease renewing support when timer T1 triggers. Using
> the UDP socket sending implementation in patch 08, the DHCP lease
> renewal is unicasted to the DHCP
On Sun, 22.12.13 04:10, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > const sd_bus_vtable bus_cgroup_vtable[] = {
> > +SD_BUS_PROPERTY("CPUAccounting", "b", bus_property_get_bool,
> > offsetof(CGroupContext, cpu_accounting), SD_BUS_VTABLE_PROPERTY_CONST),
> > +SD_BUS
On Sat, 21.12.13 04:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> This has come up before, and will come up again: running
> systemd-tmpfiles --create kills user logins. In principle
> this is documented, but in practice people don't always
> read the documentation. Split out /run/n
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:54:32PM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> New commits:
> commit d86f9d5285742e959a158e743799506b5339fefc
> Author: Lennart Poettering
> Date: Sat Dec 21 00:19:37 2013 +0100
>
> core: pass notify fd across reexecs
>
> That way we the random socket name st
On Sun, 22.12.13 15:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:54:32PM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > New commits:
> > commit d86f9d5285742e959a158e743799506b5339fefc
> > Author: Lennart Poettering
> > Date: Sat Dec 21 00:19:37 2013 +0100
>
Hello.
As you recommend me to use "Accept=", I set this as "true".
But Client process waited for a few minute, it showed error message
"connection was refused".
In this case, The best case to execute the service unit is to set "Accept=
false".
But It will definitely present error message and be h
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:43 AM, Tony Seo wrote:
> Frankly speaking, I don't understand why service daemon is infinitely
> spawned when I set the option "Accept= false".
> And Why couldn't the client process connect to socket unit that I made by
> setting "Accept= true".
I think you need to lear
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 10:25:10AM -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Makefile.am|2 +
> hwdb/20-sdio-classes.hwdb | 33 ++
> hwdb/20-sdio-vendor-model.hwdb | 45
> +
> hwdb/sdio.ids
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 03:40:35PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sun, 22.12.13 15:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 03:54:32PM -0800, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > New commits:
> > > commit d86f9d5285742e959a158e743799506b5339fe
Applied.
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
