Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] README: audit no longer breaks container

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 20.02.14 05:14, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > > -Note that kernel auditing is broken when used with systemd's > > -container code. When using systemd in conjunction with > > -containers, please make sure to either turn off auditing at > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] logind: add a debug message in case the session already exists

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 19.02.14 23:17, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote: Applied! Thanks! > If the session already exists then the only way to log it is to set the > debug option of pam_systemd. There are no debug messages in the login > service that permits to log if the session already exists. > > So

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemctl: fix description of --after/--before

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 21.02.14 20:44, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > It was backward - --after fetches After property, so units shown really > come *before* unit given as argument. Same for --before. Applied! Thanks! (I figure the whole paragraph could use some more comprehensive rewording, d

Re: [systemd-devel] commas vs spaces in config syntax

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 25.02.14 23:08, Jason A. Donenfeld (ja...@zx2c4.com) wrote: > Hey folks, > > Just came across this section in the systemd-sleep.conf man page: > > "More than one value can be specified by separating multiple values > with commas." > > But then I remember seeing in 99-default.link the li

Re: [systemd-devel] Setting cgroup properties on systemd --user

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 24.02.14 19:48, Thomas Bächler (tho...@archlinux.org) wrote: > I am trying to set properties on scopes or services of my user instance, > for example: > > systemctl --user set-property --runtime foobar.scope CPUShares=150 > > This command returns without error, but in the journal, I get

Re: [systemd-devel] [BUG] debug logging is disabled at early stage

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 28.02.14 15:19, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote: > Hello All, > > I am debugging some problems around mount_setup_early() and find that > systemd, with log_max_level set to LOG_INFO in log.c and configured > hundred lines below in main.c, is unable to tell me things I'd lik

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Do not cache use_smack() value unless /sys is mounted

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 28.02.14 17:09, Łukasz Stelmach (l.stelm...@samsung.com) wrote: > use_smack() is called very early via mkdir_p_label(). This happens > before /sys is mounted and hence before the authoritative information > about smack is even available. To prevent caching of the invalid value > check whet

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] core: add startup resource control option

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 05.03.14 17:41, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote: > Similar to CPUShares= and BlockIOWeight= respectively. However only > assign the specified weight during startup. Each control group > attribute is re-assigned as weight by CPUShares=weight and > BlockIOWeight=weight after star

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 3/3] hostnamectl: read pretty_name and cpe_name from remote

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 04.03.14 23:01, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote: The other two patches look fine (well, this one needs updating, if the prop names change as proposed in the other mail...) Please rebase, and repost, will merge then! Thanks a lot! > --- > src/hostname/hostnamectl.c | 22 +++

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/3] hostnamed: expose PrettyName and CpeName as bus properties

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Tue, 04.03.14 23:01, Djalal Harouni (tix...@opendz.org) wrote: > --- > src/hostname/hostnamed.c | 11 +++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/hostname/hostnamed.c b/src/hostname/hostnamed.c > index fab0601..f8aea78 100644 > --- a/src/hostname/hostnamed.c > +++ b/sr

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-backlight and backlight level 0

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 05.03.14 11:31, Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org) wrote: > On restore, I'd suggest reading max_brightness, and if the stored value > falls under a threshold of ceil(max_brightness/SOME_DIVISOR), restore it > to that value instead. (Ideally there should be some way to ask the > driver

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd-run: extend bash completion

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 05.03.14 23:48, Thomas H.P. Andersen (pho...@gmail.com) wrote: > From: Thomas Hindoe Paaboel Andersen > > --system > -H --host > -M --machine > --service-type (options: simple forking oneshot dbus notify idle) > --uid > --gid > --nice > --setenv > -p --property (options read from bus_app

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] [V4] systemctl: for switch-root check, if we switch to a systemd init

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 06.03.14 16:35, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote: > From: Harald Hoyer > > If "systemctl switch-root" is called with a specific "INIT" or > /proc/cmdline contains "init=", then systemd would not serialize > itsself. > > Let systemctl check, if the new init is in the standard

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] systemd: powerd initctl support

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 07.03.14 14:32, Hannes Reinecke (h...@suse.de) wrote: > Old versions of powerd will be using the initctl fifo to signal > state changes. To maintain backward compability systemd should > be interpreting these messages, too. Yuck. Can't say I am particularly enthusiastic adding compat klud

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Alex Elsayed
Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 10.03.14 23:39, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote: > >> > Well, the name is property of the admin really. There needs to be a way >> > how the admin can label his subvolumes, with a potentially localized >> > name. This makes it unsuitable for our

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 10.03.14 23:39, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote: > > Well, the name is property of the admin really. There needs to be a way > > how the admin can label his subvolumes, with a potentially localized > > name. This makes it unsuitable for our purpose, we cannot just take > > p

Re: [systemd-devel] The Bridge on the River PID EINS

2014-03-10 Thread poma
On 10.03.2014 22:47, Umut Tezduyar wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Umut Tezduyar wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried out a similar configuration and couldn't get the bridge up. I >> tried it on Arch with systemd 210. >> >> bridge.netdev >> [NetDev] >> Name=bridge0 >> Kind=bridge >> >> u.network

Re: [systemd-devel] [210] logind bypasses polkit? bug or new feature?

2014-03-10 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
On 03/10/2014 12:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:41:52AM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> On 03/10/2014 06:48 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: >>> On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:00:22PM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: Hello To do tests I made a

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 03/10/2014 09:21 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On 03/10/2014 04:02 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Mon, 10.03.14 19:34, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote: [...] >> I am pretty sure automatic discovery of mount points should not cover >> the usecase where people install multiple distr

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 03/10/2014 09:02 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 10.03.14 19:34, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote: > > Heya, > >> Instead of relying on the subvolume UUID, why not relying to the subvolume >> name: it would be more simple and flexible to manage them. >> >> For example su

Re: [systemd-devel] synchronizing user service

2014-03-10 Thread Alec Leamas
On 3/10/14, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 07.03.14 20:45, Alec Leamas (leamas.a...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> >> Sorry for not being clear. The priob >> >> On 3/7/14, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > On Fri, 07.03.14 19:58, Alec Leamas (leamas.a...@gmail.com) wrote: >> > >> >> Dear list, >> >> >>

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] rules: mark loop device as SYSTEMD_READY=0 if no file is attached

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 06.03.14 09:16, Peter Rajnoha (prajn...@redhat.com) wrote: > Hi! > > Based on SYSTEMD_READY definition, I think we should also mark loop > devices with no file attached as not ready: > > rules: mark loop device as SYSTEMD_READY=0 if no file is attached > > Check existence of loo

Re: [systemd-devel] [systemd][cgroup in container] problem with cgroup hierarchy in container

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 06.03.14 10:51, Dariusz Michaluk (d.micha...@samsung.com) wrote: > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > sd_bus_message_unref (m=0x8000) at > ../src/libsystemd/sd-bus/bus-message.c:800 > 800 m->n_ref--; > (gdb) bt > #0 sd_bus_message_unref (m=0x8000) at

Re: [systemd-devel] The Bridge on the River PID EINS

2014-03-10 Thread Umut Tezduyar
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:12 PM, Umut Tezduyar wrote: > Hi, > > I tried out a similar configuration and couldn't get the bridge up. I > tried it on Arch with systemd 210. > > bridge.netdev > [NetDev] > Name=bridge0 > Kind=bridge > > u.network > [NetDev] > Name=bridge0 > Kind=bridge Ops, copy pase

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] Fix AC_PATH_PROG usage in configure.ac for systems with (still) bin vs. sbin distiction

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.03.14 10:17, Samuli Suominen (ssuomi...@gentoo.org) wrote: > This version of the patch is likely more agreeable. No reason to add > /usr/bin:/bin again to $PATH as it should be safe to expect at least > they are there, > or otherwise the system is really *broken*. :-) Thanks. Applied.

Re: [systemd-devel] The Bridge on the River PID EINS

2014-03-10 Thread poma
On 10.03.2014 21:12, Umut Tezduyar wrote: > Hi, > > I tried out a similar configuration and couldn't get the bridge up. I > tried it on Arch with systemd 210. > > bridge.netdev > [NetDev] > Name=bridge0 > Kind=bridge > > u.network > [NetDev] > Name=bridge0 > Kind=bridge ... You want to bridge t

Re: [systemd-devel] Process ordering within a 'dependency level'

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 07.03.14 10:52, Allmeroth, Robert (robert.allmer...@harman.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I tried to optimize my embedded configuration but I stumbled over the > following problem: > > Let's assume systemd identified 10 processes on 'dependency level > 0'. They all can/should be started first/im

Re: [systemd-devel] synchronizing user service

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 07.03.14 20:45, Alec Leamas (leamas.a...@gmail.com) wrote: > > Sorry for not being clear. The priob > > On 3/7/14, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Fri, 07.03.14 19:58, Alec Leamas (leamas.a...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > >> Dear list, > >> > >> Being a systemd dummie, I have a problem. It'

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 10.03.14 14:53, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote: > Since it's not a given whether a parent or child subvolume is the one > being updated, it's ambiguous which one to use/automount if there is > inheritance of the proposed subvolumetypeGUID at snapshot > time. Inheritance of th

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mar 10, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Chris Mason wrote: > On 03/10/2014 04:02 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Mon, 10.03.14 19:34, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote: >> >> Heya, >> >>> Instead of relying on the subvolume UUID, why not relying to the subvolume >>> name: it would be mo

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] nspawn: Fix a race condition

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 10.03.14 12:15, Joel Teichroeb (j...@teichroeb.net) wrote: > If the master process registers the child before the child > has initialized, when the child tries to setup /dev/console > it gets "operation not permitted". Thanks for tracking this down! I have now applied a different patch w

Re: [systemd-devel] The Bridge on the River PID EINS

2014-03-10 Thread Umut Tezduyar
Hi, I tried out a similar configuration and couldn't get the bridge up. I tried it on Arch with systemd 210. bridge.netdev [NetDev] Name=bridge0 Kind=bridge u.network [NetDev] Name=bridge0 Kind=bridge Further debugging, seems like networkd never receives the RTM_NEWLINK for the bridge. Since br

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Mon, 10.03.14 19:34, Goffredo Baroncelli (kreij...@libero.it) wrote: Heya, > Instead of relying on the subvolume UUID, why not relying to the subvolume > name: it would be more simple and flexible to manage them. > > For example supposing to use '@' as prefix for a subvolume name: > > @

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Chris Murphy
On Mar 10, 2014, at 12:34 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > On 03/07/2014 07:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> Heya! >> >> Since yesterday systemd in git can now discover root, /home, /srv and >> swap partitions automatically based on GPT type GUIDs, thus making >> /etc/fstab unnecessary for s

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] nspawn: Fix a race condition

2014-03-10 Thread Joel Teichroeb
If the master process registers the child before the child has initialized, when the child tries to setup /dev/console it gets "operation not permitted". --- src/nspawn/nspawn.c | 14 +++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/nspawn/nspawn.c b/src/nspawn/nsp

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
Hi Kay On 03/10/2014 07:53 PM, Kay Sievers wrote: [...] >> >> Instead of relying on the subvolume UUID, why not relying to the subvolume >> name: it would be more simple and flexible to manage them. > > As a general rule: human-readable names should be left to the > administrator, provide an iden

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > On 03/07/2014 07:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> Since yesterday systemd in git can now discover root, /home, /srv and >> swap partitions automatically based on GPT type GUIDs, thus making >> /etc/fstab unnecessary for simple setup

Re: [systemd-devel] [HEADS-UP] Discoverable Partitions Spec

2014-03-10 Thread Goffredo Baroncelli
On 03/07/2014 07:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > Heya! > > Since yesterday systemd in git can now discover root, /home, /srv and > swap partitions automatically based on GPT type GUIDs, thus making > /etc/fstab unnecessary for simple setups. > > I have now put together something like a spec de

Re: [systemd-devel] device state UNKNOWN

2014-03-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 06:36:27PM +0100, arnaud gaboury wrote: > > > > It seems to me that this device is configured, so why is its state > > unknown and not UP ? Shall I use a netctl profile to bring it UP, > > like I do for enp7s0 ? > > > Yes. > # netctl enable "profile" made the br0 UP Maybe

Re: [systemd-devel] device state UNKNOWN

2014-03-10 Thread arnaud gaboury
> > It seems to me that this device is configured, so why is its state > unknown and not UP ? Shall I use a netctl profile to bring it UP, > like I do for enp7s0 ? Yes. # netctl enable "profile" made the br0 UP ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-de

Re: [systemd-devel] synchronizing user service

2014-03-10 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Alec Leamas at 10/03/14 15:46 did gyre and gimble: > On 3/10/14, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Alec Leamas at 07/03/14 19:45 did gyre and gimble: >>> Sorry for not being clear. The priob >>> >>> On 3/7/14, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 07.03.14 19:58, Alec

Re: [systemd-devel] synchronizing user service

2014-03-10 Thread Alec Leamas
On 3/10/14, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: >> […] >> Perhaps I just got it all wrong, and systemd will (does?) also handle >> the session services running within the session? Or is there a >> reasonable robust way for a system user service started ou

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add avoid_cleanup macro to cancel _cleanup_ of a pointer

2014-03-10 Thread Josh Triplett
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 04:44:02PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Sat, 08.03.14 20:33, Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org) wrote: > > > avoid_cleanup also returns a copy of the pointer, making it convenient > > to use at the point where initialization completes, to hand the constructed >

Re: [systemd-devel] synchronizing user service

2014-03-10 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:46 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > […] > Perhaps I just got it all wrong, and systemd will (does?) also handle > the session services running within the session? Or is there a > reasonable robust way for a system user service started outside the > session to join it? Or, my firs

Re: [systemd-devel] synchronizing user service

2014-03-10 Thread Alec Leamas
On 3/10/14, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Alec Leamas at 07/03/14 19:45 did gyre and gimble: >> Sorry for not being clear. The priob >> >> On 3/7/14, Lennart Poettering wrote: >>> On Fri, 07.03.14 19:58, Alec Leamas (leamas.a...@gmail.com) wrote: >>> Dear list, Being a

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Add avoid_cleanup macro to cancel _cleanup_ of a pointer

2014-03-10 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 08.03.14 20:33, Josh Triplett (j...@joshtriplett.org) wrote: > avoid_cleanup also returns a copy of the pointer, making it convenient > to use at the point where initialization completes, to hand the constructed > object off somewhere without freeing it. > > Change all NULL assignments ta

Re: [systemd-devel] [210] logind bypasses polkit? bug or new feature?

2014-03-10 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 11:41:52AM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > On 03/10/2014 06:48 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:00:22PM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > >> Hello > >> > >> To do tests I made a new Arch Linux (x86_64) base installation running > >> in qem

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd.netdev & kind=sit

2014-03-10 Thread Anthony Messina
On Monday, March 10, 2014 09:11:05 AM you wrote: > On 10 Mar 2014 02:08, "Anthony Messina" wrote: > > I've been watching the development and looking forward to testing out the > > systemd-networkd features that are coming out. > > > > One of the things I haven't seen yet is the ability to configu

Re: [systemd-devel] [210] logind bypasses polkit? bug or new feature?

2014-03-10 Thread Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi
On 03/10/2014 06:48 AM, Djalal Harouni wrote: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:00:22PM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: >> Hello >> >> To do tests I made a new Arch Linux (x86_64) base installation running >> in qemu/kvm with systemd-210-3 and polkit-0.112-1 to discard any weird >> thing on my syst

Re: [systemd-devel] synchronizing user service

2014-03-10 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Alec Leamas at 07/03/14 19:45 did gyre and gimble: > Sorry for not being clear. The priob > > On 3/7/14, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Fri, 07.03.14 19:58, Alec Leamas (leamas.a...@gmail.com) wrote: >> >>> Dear list, >>> >>> Being a systemd dummie, I have a problem. It's a ab

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] Fix AC_PATH_PROG usage in configure.ac for systems with (still) bin vs. sbin distiction

2014-03-10 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 02:13:38PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 10/03/14 13:23, Michael Olbrich wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:49:58PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > >> 2014-03-08 8:52 GMT+01:00 Samuli Suominen : > >>> If eg. setcap is in /sbin and user is building as a normal user with

[systemd-devel] device state UNKNOWN

2014-03-10 Thread arnaud gaboury
Hi, No idea why my bridge device, br0, has a state unknown. $ ip addr 3: br0: mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default link/ether 66:73:a3:0a:44:f9 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff inet 192.168.1.94/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global br0 valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever i

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] service: don't create extra cgroup for control process when reloading SysV service

2014-03-10 Thread Lukas Nykryn
Unfortunately common practice in initscripts is to have reload as an alias for restart (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SysVInitScript). In that case the newly started process will be killed immediately after the reload process ends and its cgroup is destroyed. --- src/core/service.c | 13

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] _sd_machines: Use machinectl --no-legend

2014-03-10 Thread Wieland Hoffmann
Otherwise bogus entries from the header and footer would show up in the completion list. --- shell-completion/zsh/_sd_machines | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/shell-completion/zsh/_sd_machines b/shell-completion/zsh/_sd_machines index 1d64d13..a0039ee 100644 --

[systemd-devel] Fix machinectls machine completion

2014-03-10 Thread Wieland Hoffmann
Hi, the following two patches fix machinectls machine name completion by actually installing the required _sd_machines file using machinectls --no-legend switch to prevent bogus entries from appearing in the list of machines. -- Wieland ___ systemd-de

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/2] zsh completion: Install _sd_machines with _machinectl

2014-03-10 Thread Wieland Hoffmann
_machinectl uses _sd_machines to provide a list of all available machines. --- Makefile.am | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am index 2db58a9..2775c99 100644 --- a/Makefile.am +++ b/Makefile.am @@ -4030,7 +4030,8 @@ dist_dbuspolicy_DATA +=

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] Fix AC_PATH_PROG usage in configure.ac for systems with (still) bin vs. sbin distiction

2014-03-10 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 10/03/14 13:23, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:49:58PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: >> 2014-03-08 8:52 GMT+01:00 Samuli Suominen : >>> If eg. setcap is in /sbin and user is building as a normal user without >>> $PATH having /sbin, the build system >>> will default to /usr/sb

Re: [systemd-devel] [patch] Fix AC_PATH_PROG usage in configure.ac for systems with (still) bin vs. sbin distiction

2014-03-10 Thread Michael Olbrich
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:49:58PM +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: > 2014-03-08 8:52 GMT+01:00 Samuli Suominen : > > If eg. setcap is in /sbin and user is building as a normal user without > > $PATH having /sbin, the build system > > will default to /usr/sbin/setcap as it's defined in AC_PATH_PROG and

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] core: add default extra dependency option

2014-03-10 Thread WaLyong Cho
On 03/03/2014 11:43 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mon, 03.03.14 11:52, WaLyong Cho (walyong@samsung.com) wrote: > >>> But if you do this on an embedded system you can do >>> DefaultDependencies=no for all services where you want this and place >>> them manually? >>> >> Almost I can. Actua

Re: [systemd-devel] [210] logind bypasses polkit? bug or new feature?

2014-03-10 Thread Djalal Harouni
On Sun, Mar 09, 2014 at 08:00:22PM -0300, Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi wrote: > Hello > > To do tests I made a new Arch Linux (x86_64) base installation running > in qemu/kvm with systemd-210-3 and polkit-0.112-1 to discard any weird > thing on my system. > > I can reboot/poweroff/suspend/hibernate the