---
src/machine/machine.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/machine/machine.c b/src/machine/machine.c
index c0fa1b2..7e90d61 100644
--- a/src/machine/machine.c
+++ b/src/machine/machine.c
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@ int machine_start(Machine *m, sd_bus_message *proper
---
src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/sysusers/sysusers.c b/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
index 1209a5a..c0af693 100644
--- a/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
+++ b/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
@@ -1312,6 +1312,8 @@ static int parse_line(const char *fname, unsigned line
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Ronny Chevalier
wrote:
> ---
> src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/src/sysusers/sysusers.c b/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
> index 1209a5a..c0af693 100644
> --- a/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
> +++ b/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
> @@
Thanks for the report. I pushed a slightly different fix. We generally
prefer to just return directly the value rather than assigning it to r
first (when possible).
-t
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Ronny Chevalier
wrote:
> ---
> src/machine/machine.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
2014-07-06 14:06 GMT+02:00 Tom Gundersen :
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Ronny Chevalier
> wrote:
>> ---
>> src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/src/sysusers/sysusers.c b/src/sysusers/sysusers.c
>> index 1209a5a..c0af693 100644
>> --- a/src/sys
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Ronny Chevalier
wrote:
> 2014-07-06 14:06 GMT+02:00 Tom Gundersen :
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Ronny Chevalier
>> wrote:
>>> ---
>>> src/sysusers/sysusers.c | 2 ++
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/src/sysusers/sysusers.c b/src/sysu
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:05:29PM +0200, Ronny Chevalier wrote:
> 2014-07-05 20:56 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> > +if (src_size < 9)
> > +return -ENOSPC;
> Also, I am not sure that ENOSPC is appropriate here (and everywhere) ?
> Why not ENOMEM (since there is n
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 02:57:17PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:05:29PM +0200, Ronny Chevalier wrote:
> > 2014-07-05 20:56 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> > > +if (src_size < 9)
> > > +return -ENOSPC;
> > Also, I am not sur
Hello everybody,
I join this mailing list because I want to discuss extending systemctl
with a method to escape unit names. Currently systemd and systemctl
deal with escaped unit names but there are many potential name sources
which doesn't have out-of-the-box escaping methods.
The issue is a Deb
Hi,
Sorry for a delayed reply.
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 01:46:53PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> it would be good to know what the precise error output is you get now
> with this new change...
With systemd-215 udevd still complains (and segfaults) about the virtual
interface:
--
$ journa
Hi,
I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
/proc/self/mounts as it should.
So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic link /etc/mtab
because /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/etc.conf contains is a line "L+ /etc/mtab - - - -
../proc/self/mounts".
Is this in
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
> /proc/self/mounts as it should.
> So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic link /etc/mtab
> because /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/etc.conf contains is a lin
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
>> /proc/self/mounts as it should.
>> So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic link /etc/
On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:13:55, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
> >> /proc/self/mounts as it should.
> >>
Hi,
With systemd-215 networkd fails to set up the DHCPv4 on WAN interface:
--
$ journalctl -u systemd-networkd.service | grep wlp1s0
Jul 06 12:21:07 hermes systemd-networkd[355]: wlp1s0 : link configured
Jul 06 12:21:08 hermes systemd-networkd[355]: wlp1s0 : gained ca
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 04:01:52PM +0200, Gero Treuner wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I join this mailing list because I want to discuss extending systemctl
> with a method to escape unit names. Currently systemd and systemctl
> deal with escaped unit names but there are many potential name sources
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 09:15:28PM +0400, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:13:55, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov
> > wrote:
> > > On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:01:22, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> I have a re
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:44:05PM -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 09:15:28PM +0400, Ivan Shapovalov wrote:
> > On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13:13:55, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Ivan Shapovalov
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sunday 06 July 2014 at 13
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With systemd-215 networkd fails to set up the DHCPv4 on WAN interface:
> --
> $ journalctl -u systemd-networkd.service | grep wlp1s0
> Jul 06 12:21:07 hermes systemd-networkd[355]: wlp1s0 : link
> configured
> Jul
Hi,
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:13:56PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 01:44:05PM -0400, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> >
> > So... the solution would be for distro packages to ship mtab as a symlink to
> > "../proc" instead of "/proc"?
> No, the latter is fine, or even
On Sun, 06.07.14 13:01, Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a read-only / filesystem and /etc/mtab points to
> /proc/self/mounts as it should.
> So, in systemd-215 tmpfile.d fails to create a symbolic link /etc/mtab
> because /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d/etc.conf contain
On Sun, 06.07.14 13:44, Leonid Isaev (lis...@umail.iu.edu) wrote:
> > > I think the path matching is a little naive; Using a simple string
> > > comparison, "/proc/self/mounts" != "../proc/self/mounts" even though
> > > both paths refer to the same object.
> >
> > No, they aren't referring to the
On Sun, 06.07.14 20:13, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > > > I think the path matching is a little naive; Using a simple string
> > > > comparison, "/proc/self/mounts" != "../proc/self/mounts" even though
> > > > both paths refer to the same object.
> > >
> > > No, they
On Fri, 04.07.14 20:30, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote:
>
> On 03/07/14 14:27, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > BTW, to clarify what this is about I will now rename the tupel macro
> > from ARCH_TUPLE to LIB_ARCH_TUPLE or so, since this is about locations
> > for shared librar
On Sat, 05.07.14 20:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> -bool uncompress_blob(const void *src, uint64_t src_size,
> - void **dst, uint64_t *dst_alloc_size, uint64_t*
> dst_size, uint64_t dst_max) {
> +int compress_blob_lz4(const void *src, uint64_t src
On Sun, 06.07.14 16:01, Gero Treuner
(gt_18_lists.freedesktop@innocircle.com) wrote:
>
> 1. Extend systemctl unit name interpretation with a syntax to escape in
>controlled manner, preferably capable of escaping only parts of a
>given name to support compound names with verbatim cont
2014-07-06 22:12 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> (And I think I would prefer this as seperate tool from systemctl -- and
> not just as new verbs), since this appears to not be directly related to
> what systemctl otherwise does which is control the system...)
I ended up with something like this.
2014-07-06 22:28 GMT+02:00 Michael Biebl :
> If there is consensus, I'll just move it from
> rootlibexec_PROGRAMS to rootbin_PROGRAMS
And moving it to $PATH probably means adding a short man page
--
Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the
universe are pointed away
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:28:55PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> +#include
> +#include
> +
> +#include "log.h"
> +#include "unit-name.h"
> +
> +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
> +char *escaped_name = NULL;
> +
> +if (argc != 2) {
> +log_error("This program requi
2014-07-06 23:22 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 10:28:55PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> +#include
>> +#include
>> +
>> +#include "log.h"
>> +#include "unit-name.h"
>> +
>> +int main(int argc, char *argv[]) {
>> +char *escaped_name = NULL;
>> +
>> +
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 09:47:02PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sat, 05.07.14 20:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> > -bool uncompress_blob(const void *src, uint64_t src_size,
> > - void **dst, uint64_t *dst_alloc_size, uint64_t*
> > dst_si
On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:43:01PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > With systemd-215 networkd fails to set up the DHCPv4 on WAN
> > interface:
> > --
> > $ journalctl -u systemd-networkd.service | grep wlp1s0
> > Jul 06
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 06, 2014 at 08:43:01PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 7:17 PM, Leonid Isaev wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > With systemd-215 networkd fails to set up the DHCPv4 on WAN
>> > interface:
>> > --
>> > $ j
Hi,
Shouldn't systemd-sysusers update /etc/gshadow when adding 'basic'
groups? From sysusers.c I don't see that gshadow (and shadow) is updated, and
this seems to cause problems on package updates. Consider the following
scenario:
1. A package is updated, so timestamp of /usr gets ahead of
> > Looks good otheriwse.
> >
> > BTW, have you checked whether reuseing the XZ context might make the XZ
> > more competitive?
> No, I haven't. But I seriously doubt how it could improve things enough to
> make a difference (> 2 orders).
I generated some coredumps, fixed some messages, and things
a long ago, /dev/root is an symblic to real root device. no matter it is on
NFS or HDD, we can use
/dev/root / auto defaults 0 0
in fstab to mount / as readwrite.
recently, I recall this old feature, and tryed to use it, but the system
failed to boot, waiting for /dev/root that never
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:29 AM, microcai wrote:
>
> a long ago, /dev/root is an symblic to real root device. no matter it is on
> NFS or HDD, we can use
>
> /dev/root / auto defaults 0 0
>
> in fstab to mount / as readwrite.
Is it any better than just using 'rw' in the kernel command line?
37 matches
Mail list logo
