Hello everybody,
I always receive this error:
```
|Jul 14 08:27:57 matrix-node systemd-logind[1339]: Failed to abandon session
scope: Connection reset by peer|
```
When I shutdown a NixOS instance.
Googling around didn't bring up any useful results. What does this error
mean, and why does
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 11:04:44PM -0500, Charles Duffy wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 10:40 PM, Charles Duffy wrote:
>
> > Howdy --
> >
> > It seems a bit unfortunate to have the only way to deserialize content in
> > journald's official serialization/export format depend on a HTTP server
> >
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 06:28:10PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote:
> For pluggable ttys such as USB serial devices, the getty is restarted
> and exits in a loop until the remove event reaches systemd. Under
> certain circumstances the restart loop can overload the system in a
> way that prevents the
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:32:50AM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
> On 16 July 2014 10:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:29:15AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:13:06AM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
> >> > and
Before this commit systemctl reload on an inactive unit with a queued
start job would block until the unit had started if the unit supported
reload, but return failure immediately if the unit didn't.
Additionally systemctl reload-or-try-restart (and systemctl force-reload)
would block until the un
On 16 July 2014 10:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:29:15AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:13:06AM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
>> > and btw make it pass for 32bits where size_t != uint64_t
>> Do they still make tho
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 03:29:15AM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:13:06AM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
> > and btw make it pass for 32bits where size_t != uint64_t
> Do they still make those? ;)
>
> Will apply.
Actually please apply it yourself. Looks
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:13:06AM +0900, Marc-Antoine Perennou wrote:
> and btw make it pass for 32bits where size_t != uint64_t
Do they still make those? ;)
Will apply.
Zbyszek
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://
and btw make it pass for 32bits where size_t != uint64_t
---
src/journal/test-compress-benchmark.c | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/test-compress-benchmark.c
b/src/journal/test-compress-benchmark.c
index 0a23bd1..a346447 100644
--- a/src/jour
On Tue, 15.07.14 11:05, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 17:17 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 14.07.14 15:38, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > > But that brings up another question; I don't think systemd-networkd is
> > > currently capabl
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:33 PM, poma wrote:
> On 15.07.2014 09:01, poma wrote:
>>
>>
>> This sometimes works, sometimes not. :)
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119481
>>
>
> Resolved.
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918197
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.c
On 15.07.2014 09:01, poma wrote:
This sometimes works, sometimes not. :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119481
Resolved.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918197
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=918198
poma
For pluggable ttys such as USB serial devices, the getty is restarted
and exits in a loop until the remove event reaches systemd. Under
certain circumstances the restart loop can overload the system in a
way that prevents the remove event from reaching systemd for a long
time (e.g. at least several
On Tue, 2014-07-15 at 17:17 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 14.07.14 15:38, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > But that brings up another question; I don't think systemd-networkd is
> > currently capable of ensuring a machine is completely configured when RA
> > is enabled, bec
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Alick Zhao wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 04:10 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> So maybe ID_SOFTWARE_RADIO ?
>>
>> Hmm, SDR is more a term for a generic technology than for a device
>> class. To me it does not really sound like an administrator would know
>> what this is.
>>
>
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 10:38 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-07-14 at 11:06 -0700, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
>> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> > "yes" is a synonym for "both" and "no" for "none".
>>
>> These are odd semantics, given that IPv6 is completely conf
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 8:06 PM, David Timothy Strauss
wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 3:32 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> "yes" is a synonym for "both" and "no" for "none".
>
> These are odd semantics, given that IPv6 is completely configurable
> using router advertisements for even DNS information
On Mon, 14.07.14 15:38, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
> But that brings up another question; I don't think systemd-networkd is
> currently capable of ensuring a machine is completely configured when RA
> is enabled, because it doesn't handle RDNSS and DNSSD options from the
> RA response.
Change the way socket activated services are instantiated so that the
full instnace name with addresses of both parties and not only the
counter make it into units' descriptions visible in the journal.
---
src/core/socket.c | 23 +--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletio
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 03:14:02PM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:36:29AM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> >> Oneshot services's cgroup is removed when the service
> >> exits. An asse
On 15.07.2014 15:46, Jan Safranek wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 03:38 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
>> Not sure about:
>>
>> * Halt(), PowerOff(), Reboot()
>
> OpenLMI is interested in these. They are already covered by logind,
> which is integrated with polkit just fine. Look for actions like
> org.freedeskto
On 07/15/2014 03:38 PM, Stef Walter wrote:
> Not sure about:
>
> * Halt(), PowerOff(), Reboot()
OpenLMI is interested in these. They are already covered by logind,
which is integrated with polkit just fine. Look for actions like
org.freedesktop.login1.reboot, reboot-multiple-sessions etc. in
org
On 15.07.2014 15:15, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 15.07.14 13:35, Stef Walter (s...@thewalter.net) wrote:
>
>> Cockpit, OpenLMI, and others want to use the systemd D-Bus API to manage
>> system services/sockets etc. In addition we use polkit to authorize
>> users and allow people to escalat
On 07/15/2014 03:15 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 15.07.14 13:35, Stef Walter (s...@thewalter.net) wrote:
>
>> Cockpit, OpenLMI, and others want to use the systemd D-Bus API to manage
>> system services/sockets etc. In addition we use polkit to authorize
>> users and allow people to esca
On Tue, 15.07.14 13:35, Stef Walter (s...@thewalter.net) wrote:
> Cockpit, OpenLMI, and others want to use the systemd D-Bus API to manage
> system services/sockets etc. In addition we use polkit to authorize
> users and allow people to escalate privileges as needed.
>
> It seems that the D-Bus A
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:36:29AM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
>> Oneshot services's cgroup is removed when the service
>> exits. An assert is hit otherwise.
>> ---
>> src/core/manager.c |3 ++-
>> 1 file changed,
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 08:36:29AM +0200, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog wrote:
> Oneshot services's cgroup is removed when the service
> exits. An assert is hit otherwise.
> ---
> src/core/manager.c |3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/core/manager.c b/src/co
On 07/15/2014 04:10 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Alick Zhao wrote:
>> On 07/15/2014 08:03 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>>> So is it possible to add ID_SDR_HW in the 70-uaccess.rules file?
> It could be done. Whether systemd is the best place to keep the rules
> f
Cockpit, OpenLMI, and others want to use the systemd D-Bus API to manage
system services/sockets etc. In addition we use polkit to authorize
users and allow people to escalate privileges as needed.
It seems that the D-Bus API of systemd doesn't support polkit:
http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Soft
---
src/core/cgroup.c |6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/cgroup.c b/src/core/cgroup.c
index cd67963..ed5687d 100644
--- a/src/core/cgroup.c
+++ b/src/core/cgroup.c
@@ -303,12 +303,12 @@ void cgroup_context_apply(CGroupContext *c,
CGroupController
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 5:09 AM, Alick Zhao wrote:
> On 07/15/2014 08:03 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> So is it possible to add ID_SDR_HW in the 70-uaccess.rules file?
>>> > It could be done. Whether systemd is the best place to keep the rules
>>> > for SDR depends on whether there's a better pro
This sometimes works, sometimes not. :)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1119481
poma
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
32 matches
Mail list logo
