Hi,
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:58:15PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:54 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:18:14PM +0200, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> >> A quick fix would be to set
> >>
> >> /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/all/promote_secondaries
On 24/07/14 14:05, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
Hi Tom,
[snip]
... you already are getting
assigned the correct IP address at first, and then only later does
this change. What is causing your DHCP server to send out a different
IP address later on, I don't know, but it seems unlikely that this is
any
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Brendan Hide
wrote:
> On 24/07/14 14:05, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>>
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> [snip]
>>>
>>> ... you already are getting
>>>
>>> assigned the correct IP address at first, and then only later does
>>> this change. What is causing your DHCP server to send out
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:00:27AM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
> On 24/07/14 14:05, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> >[snip]
> >>... you already are getting
> >>assigned the correct IP address at first, and then only later does
> >>this change. What is causing your DHCP server to send out a different
>
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Michael Olbrich
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 11:00:27AM +0200, Brendan Hide wrote:
>> On 24/07/14 14:05, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
>> >[snip]
>> >>... you already are getting
>> >>assigned the correct IP address at first, and then only later does
>> >>thi
---
src/journal/journald-kmsg.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/journal/journald-kmsg.c b/src/journal/journald-kmsg.c
index 12992e7..8d24344 100644
--- a/src/journal/journald-kmsg.c
+++ b/src/journal/journald-kmsg.c
@@ -274,6 +274,9 @@ static void dev_
There is a small number of the places in sources where we don't check
asprintf() return code and assume that after error the function
returns NULL pointer via the first argument. That's wrong, after
error the content of pointer is undefined.
---
src/core/unit-printf.c
В Fri, 25 Jul 2014 15:38:31 +0200
Karel Zak пишет:
> There is a small number of the places in sources where we don't check
> asprintf() return code and assume that after error the function
> returns NULL pointer via the first argument. That's wrong, after
> error the content of pointer is undefin
Hi,
I'm wondering what the reason for IgnoreSIGPIPE to default to true is.
The documentation just states that
Defaults to true because SIGPIPE generally is useful only in shell
pipelines.
But I don't think that this alone is a good reason to change the default.
It can confuse programs w
There seems to be no way in systemd-networkd to put a link in Promiscuous mode.
This is needed to make macvlan work correctly (Otherwise it receives no traffic
with its mac address as the destination). If I am not mistaken this could be a
boolean in *.link files.
-
Thomas
_
10 matches
Mail list logo
