Re: [systemd-devel] nilfs-cleanerd startup on boot

On Feb 28, 2015 6:41 PM, "Lennart Poettering" wrote: > > On Fri, 27.02.15 19:19, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > On 02/27/2015 06:31 PM, dennis.mur...@wipro.com wrote: > > >I have a fedora 21 system that where I mount an nilfs2 file system. I use a simple /etc/modules-load

Re: [systemd-devel] nilfs-cleanerd startup on boot

On Fri, 27.02.15 19:19, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 02/27/2015 06:31 PM, dennis.mur...@wipro.com wrote: > >I have a fedora 21 system that where I mount an nilfs2 file system. I use a > >simple /etc/modules-load.d/nilfs.conf file to load the kernel module and > >have a

Re: [systemd-devel] nilfs-cleanerd startup on boot

On Fri, 27.02.15 18:31, dennis.mur...@wipro.com (dennis.mur...@wipro.com) wrote: > I have a fedora 21 system that where I mount an nilfs2 file system. > I use a simple /etc/modules-load.d/nilfs.conf file to load the > kernel module and have an entry in the fstab. Creating the modules-load.d snip

Re: [systemd-devel] Remote api for systemd via separate daemon

On Sat, 28.02.15 17:25, Peter Paule (systemd-de...@fedux.org) wrote: > While reading the news about dkr swarm and seeing what's going on at > CoreOS' fleet, a mail to the ML from 2013 came into my mind. > > There was someone asking for some network API for systemd, if I remember > correctly. I th

Re: [systemd-devel] Linking containers

On Fri, 27.02.15 07:42, Peter Paule (systemd-de...@fedux.org) wrote: > > networkd is by default shipped in a way now that it will do dhcp > > server stuff on the host for the network interfaces exposed by nspawn, > > and dhcp client stuff in the container for the interface it sees > > there. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] unit: When stopping due to BindsTo=, log which unit caused it

On Fri, 27.02.15 17:13, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > On Thu, 26.02.15 16:50, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > > > IMHO it would be prudent to skip adding the BindsTo= if at the time of > > creating the .mount unit the backing .device unit doesn't actually > >

[systemd-devel] Remote api for systemd via separate daemon

While reading the news about dkr swarm and seeing what's going on at CoreOS' fleet, a mail to the ML from 2013 came into my mind. There was someone asking for some network API for systemd, if I remember correctly. I think the answer was no, because you don't want systemd to be exposed to the "oute

[systemd-devel] systemd-networkd and bonding config

I've just finished migration from /etc/init.d/networking script to systemd-networkd solution, and I just wanted to ask a couple of things. First, I have two interfaces -- one wire (eth1) and one wifi (wlan0), and I want them to be bonded into one bond0 interface. I had that solution when I was usi

Re: [systemd-devel] heads-up: chasing journal(?) related regression in 219 causing boot hang/fail

On Sun, 22.02.15 17:55, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering [2015-02-20 17:02 +0100]: > > To me this appears as if dbus is hanging for some reason. Have you > > checked what dbus is doing? > > D-Bus itself seems to be fine. There are services on it, busctl works, > et

Re: [systemd-devel] [v1] shutdown: add kexec loading, avoid calling `kexec` binary unnessecarily

On 2015-02-28 02:02, Shawn Landden wrote: On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Jan Janssen mailto:medhe...@web.de>> wrote: Shawn Landden churchofgit.com > writes: > void strv_free(char **l) { > -strv_clear(l); > +char **k; > + >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] machined: use x-machine-unix prefix for the container bus on dbus1

May I ask if this can be reviewed/applied? Thanks, Benjamin 2015-02-19 20:47 GMT+01:00 Benjamin Franzke : > This fixes "machinectl login" on systems configured with --disable-kdbus. > > The error was: > machinectl login foo > Failed to get machine PTY: Input/output error > --- > src/machine/ma

Re: [systemd-devel] sd_id128_equal borked

On Fri, 27.02.15 15:48, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote: > _sd_pure_ static inline int sd_id128_equal(sd_id128_t a, sd_id128_t b) { > return memcmp(&a, &b, 16) == 0; > } > > this should either be return memcmp(&a, &b, 16); > or return bool The way I see it "equal" functions