Re: [systemd-devel] nspawn and Qemu compatibility?

2015-04-03 Thread Alison Chaiken
I asked: >> I've been using Qemu to cross-compile packages and root filesystems >> for a while and thought I'd try nspawn instead. [ . . . ] >> Here's the base sequence: >> Install >> == [ . . . ] >> Boot as Qemu >> === [ . . . ] >> Login with nspawn >> === >> moun

Re: [systemd-devel] nspawn and Qemu compatibility?

2015-04-03 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:14:18 -0700 Alison Chaiken пишет: > I've been using Qemu to cross-compile packages and root filesystems > for a while and thought I'd try nspawn instead.While I sometimes > want a full GUI desktop in the walled-off environment, mostly console > is enough, and for that nsp

Re: [systemd-devel] auto-unmount via BindsTo= is annoying

2015-04-03 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 21:19:24 +0300 Mantas Mikulėnas пишет: > Previously udev used to undo mounts when a device *disappeared;* when > systemd took over the task, it started unmounting things as soon as it > noticed that the device *doesn't exist right now.* While similar, the new > behavior can be a

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and smartd daemon

2015-04-03 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 19:16:59 +0200 Lennart Poettering пишет: > On Fri, 03.04.15 19:38, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:17:05 +0200 > > Lennart Poettering пишет: > > > > > On Thu, 02.04.15 11:49, Al Lau (laua...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > > > As a test,

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] Set the NOCOW flag for the journal via tmpfiles

2015-04-03 Thread Cameron Norman
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 12:43 PM, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > Hi, > did you find the time to give a look a these patches ? Do you have any > suggestions ? > I do not know about anyone else, but this message was in my spam box. The reason was: "It has a from address in libero.it but has failed l

[systemd-devel] nspawn and Qemu compatibility?

2015-04-03 Thread Alison Chaiken
I've been using Qemu to cross-compile packages and root filesystems for a while and thought I'd try nspawn instead.While I sometimes want a full GUI desktop in the walled-off environment, mostly console is enough, and for that nspawn sounds more efficient. Here's the base sequence: Install ==

Re: [systemd-devel] Starting a unit on resume from suspend/hibernate

2015-04-03 Thread Dimitrios Apostolou
On Fri, 3 Apr 2015, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 02.04.15 21:24, Dimitrios Apostolou (ji...@gmx.net) wrote: Usually if one wants to do that one is just working around some problems that are better solved in a different way. Why precisely do you need this feature? I need to properly ter

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03-04-15 20:21, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: On Apr 03 2

[systemd-devel] auto-unmount via BindsTo= is annoying

2015-04-03 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
Previously udev used to undo mounts when a device *disappeared;* when systemd took over the task, it started unmounting things as soon as it noticed that the device *doesn't exist right now.* While similar, the new behavior can be annoying, since it also triggers if the device never existed in the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Benjamin Tissoires > wrote: > > On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, David Herrmann wrote: > >> Hi > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benjamin Tissoires > >> wrote: > >> > On Apr 03 2015 or thereabou

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, David Herrmann wrote: >> Hi >> >> On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benjamin Tissoires >> wrote: >> > On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> On 03-04-15 15:51, David He

Re: [systemd-devel] Different behaviour when sending SIGTERM

2015-04-03 Thread Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello
2015-04-03 12:49 GMT-03:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Sun, 29.03.15 19:33, Marcos Mello (marcos...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Mar 29 15:21:16 xxx.localdomain systemd[1]: squid.service: Supervising >> process 1491 which is not our child. We'll most likely not notice when it >> exits. > > This is probabl

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and smartd daemon

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 03.04.15 19:38, Andrei Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:17:05 +0200 > Lennart Poettering пишет: > > > On Thu, 02.04.15 11:49, Al Lau (laua...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > > > As a test, the "/usr/sbin/smartd $smartd_opts" is invoked from the command > > > line an

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and smartd daemon

2015-04-03 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 13:17:05 +0200 Lennart Poettering пишет: > On Thu, 02.04.15 11:49, Al Lau (laua...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > As a test, the "/usr/sbin/smartd $smartd_opts" is invoked from the command > > line and the daemon is forked and stayed up as expected. By default, the > > /usr/sbin/smar

Re: [systemd-devel] Synchronization Between Services at Shutdown

2015-04-03 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
В Fri, 3 Apr 2015 14:04:10 +0200 Lennart Poettering пишет: > On Thu, 02.04.15 16:28, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > > > Lennart Poettering [2015-04-02 13:03 +0200]: > > > Yeah, and rightfully so. I mean, a service really should be able to > > > shutdown if dbus is dead. In fact, i

Re: [systemd-devel] How to debug blocking service start?

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 27.03.15 10:32, Kai Hendry (hen...@webconverger.com) wrote: > First, thanks for trying to help me Kai. Awesome name btw. > > On Fri, 27 Mar 2015, at 03:26 AM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > Try Type=simple to not let it wait. That is telling systemd, that the > > binary > > will not daemonize - a

Re: [systemd-devel] How to debug blocking service start?

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 26.03.15 20:26, Kai Krakow (hurikha...@gmail.com) wrote: > Kai Hendry schrieb: > > > Hi there, > > > > How do I figure out why or where something is stuck? > > http://s.natalian.org/2015-03-25/systemd-start-issue.png > > > > `journalctl -u surf -f` prints nothing. > > > > Binary surf

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v4] Add reboot to EFI support

2015-04-03 Thread Jan Janssen
--- Changes in v4: - better logind API naming - don't write to efi vars if they don't change man/systemctl.xml | 10 +++ shell-completion/bash/systemctl.in | 2 +- shell-completion/zsh/_systemctl.in | 1 + src/login/logind-dbus.c| 9

Re: [systemd-devel] Different behaviour when sending SIGTERM

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sun, 29.03.15 19:33, Marcos Mello (marcos...@gmail.com) wrote: > Mar 29 15:21:16 xxx.localdomain systemd[1]: squid.service: Supervising > process 1491 which is not our child. We'll most likely not notice when it > exits. This is probably the source of your problems: squid's main process (or w

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, David Herrmann wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benjamin Tissoires > wrote: > > On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, Hans de Goede wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 03-04-15 15:51, David Herrmann wrote: > >> >Hi > >> > > >> >On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Han

Re: [systemd-devel] networkd: Is auto-negotiation turned off when specifying parameters in a link file?

2015-04-03 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 02.04.15 13:11, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote: > >> Dear systemd folks, >> >> >> some network cards with certain cables and devices take up to five >> seconds so that the link is up [1]. >> >> $ sud

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd "looping too fast" after an automatic attempt to restart anacron

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Sat, 28.03.15 10:49, Alberto Bertogli (albert...@blitiri.com.ar) wrote: > > Hi! > > I noticed by chance that systemd was using ~15% of a CPU in my laptop, > according to top. > > This is on Debian testing, systemd 215-12. > > The machine has been up since January, but this started to happen

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 4:38 PM, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 03-04-15 15:51, David Herrmann wrote: >> >Hi >> > >> >On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: >> >>input_id already (tries to) tag accelerometers as su

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] gpt-generator: Find device on a stateless system

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 01.04.15 23:04, Tobias Hunger (tobias.hun...@gmail.com) wrote: > A stateless system has a tmpfs as root file system. That obviously > does not have any block device associated with it. So try falling back > to the device of the /usr filesystem if the root filesystem fails. > --- > src/gpt

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] efi-boot-generator: Continue if /boot does not exist

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Wed, 01.04.15 22:53, Tobias Hunger (tobias.hun...@gmail.com) wrote: > /boot does not exist on a stateless system, so do not get > confused by that. > --- > src/efi-boot-generator/efi-boot-generator.c | 23 +++ > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --g

Re: [systemd-devel] networkd: Is auto-negotiation turned off when specifying parameters in a link file?

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 13:11, Paul Menzel (paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net) wrote: > Dear systemd folks, > > > some network cards with certain cables and devices take up to five > seconds so that the link is up [1]. > > $ sudo journalctl -u systemd-networkd > -- Logs begin at Fr 201

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Benjamin Tissoires
On Apr 03 2015 or thereabouts, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 03-04-15 15:51, David Herrmann wrote: > >Hi > > > >On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>input_id already (tries to) tag accelerometers as such, but this only works > >>for absolute accelerometers. Recent kernels

Re: [systemd-devel] fsckd needs to go

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
B1;3802;0cOn Fri, 03.04.15 15:17, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > >To start with, the code is really wrong, it should never have been > >merged in its current state, the read/write logic for the sockets is > >completely borked (I cannot even boot my own machine reliably with > >it!). A

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03-04-15 15:51, David Herrmann wrote: Hi On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: input_id already (tries to) tag accelerometers as such, but this only works for absolute accelerometers. Recent kernels mark accelerometers through an input prop. Trust that prop and always t

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] hwdb: Add entries for the pointingstick on 2 Dell Latitudes

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
The pointingstick of the Dell Latitude E6400 is somewhat slow by default, where as the pointingstick of the Dell Latitude D620 is much too fast by default, set POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL for both of them to adjust for this. --- hwdb/70-pointingstick.hwdb | 12 1 file changed, 12 insert

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] hwdb: Add entries for the trackpoint on 2 Thinkpads

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Lenovo has changed the sensitity of the trackpoint on the x240 / T440s / T540 generation of Thinkpads, making them somewhat unsensitive by default, add a hwdb entry to tweak the sensitivity setting. The ThinkPad X200s is way way too slow by default and unless you push the trackpoint quite hard onl

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] udev: Add rules and hwdb files for setting pointingstick properties

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
There is quite a wide spread in the delta events generated by pointingsticks, some generate deltas of 1-2 under normal use, while others generate deltas from 1-20. This commit adds a set of rules + a hwdb file which allows specifying a per model POINTINGSTICK_CONST_ACCEL value which can be used by

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] udev: Update pointingstick rules to allow setting ibm trackpoint sensitivity

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
The IBM / Lenovo trackpoints are special, they allow specifying a sensitivity setting through a ps/2 command, which changes the range of the deltas send when using the trackpoint. One some models with normal usage one only deltas of 1 or 2 are send, resulting in there only being 2 mouse cursor move

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] udev: Add rules and hwdb files for setting pointingstick properties

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, Here is v2 of my pointstick set. Changes since v1: -Drop the patch to set ID_INPUT_TRACKPOINT, Peter already send almost the same patch to set ID_INPUT_POINTINGSTICK -s/trackpoint/pointingstick/ unlike trackpoint pointingstick is a vendor neutral name, and pointingstick is also what the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread David Herrmann
Hi On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 12:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > input_id already (tries to) tag accelerometers as such, but this only works > for absolute accelerometers. Recent kernels mark accelerometers through an > input prop. Trust that prop and always tag devices with it with > ID_INPUT_ACCELERO

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 03-04-15 13:13, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Fri, 03.04.15 12:07, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote: input_id already (tries to) tag accelerometers as such, but this only works for absolute accelerometers. Recent kernels mark accelerometers through an input prop. Trust that prop

[systemd-devel] Bootchart rework

2015-04-03 Thread Daniel Mack
Hi, With the help of Lennart and Alexander Sverdlin, I reworked major parts of the bootchart code to make it more readable and maintainable. Most importantly, I got rid a number of global variables that were used all over the place, fixed tons of coding style issues and dead code. The patches for

Re: [systemd-devel] fsckd needs to go

2015-04-03 Thread Didier Roche
Le 03/04/2015 14:58, Lennart Poettering a écrit : Heya, Hey Lennart, so we discussed the whole fsckd situation a bit more here in Berlin, and we came to the conclusion that fsckd really should not exist the way it does in systemd. To start with, the code is really wrong, it should never have

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and smartd daemon

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 03.04.15 12:45, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: > Actually why does it need a pidfile in the first place? Systemd is usually > good at guessing the mainpid. Yeah, if there's only one process remaining after the parent process exited, then the PID file logic is unnecessary. Tha

[systemd-devel] fsckd needs to go

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
Heya, so we discussed the whole fsckd situation a bit more here in Berlin, and we came to the conclusion that fsckd really should not exist the way it does in systemd. To start with, the code is really wrong, it should never have been merged in its current state, the read/write logic for the sock

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and smartd daemon

2015-04-03 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015, 14:17 Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 02.04.15 11:49, Al Lau (laua...@gmail.com) wrote: > As a test, the "/usr/sbin/smartd $smartd_opts" is invoked from the command > line and the daemon is forked and stayed up as expected. By default, the > /usr/sbin/smartd daemonize.

Re: [systemd-devel] recent udev dependency change delays plymouth and udev

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 09:39, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Hello all, > > The recent commit > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd/commit/?id=d99ce933 (which > also made it into v219-stable at > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/systemd/systemd-stable/commit/?h=v219-stable&id=b238b0ea

Re: [systemd-devel] Timers and Service Conditions

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 12:01, Merten Sach (mer...@tabinin.eu) wrote: > Hi, > > I have a problem with a timer that trigges a service that has a condition set. > The timer defines the following properties: > > [Timer] > OnBootSec=1h > OnUnitInactiveSec=1h > Unit=autobackup@%i.service > > The se

Re: [systemd-devel] Synchronization Between Services at Shutdown

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 20:55, Kurt von Laven (k...@endlessm.com) wrote: > On a separate note, how long does systemd wait after sending a SIGTERM to a > service before sending it a SIGKILL? 90s. This may be configured per-service in TimeoutStopSec= and globally with DefaultTimeoutStopSec= in system.con

Re: [systemd-devel] Synchronization Between Services at Shutdown

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 22:28, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Hello, > > Dan Williams [2015-04-02 9:51 -0500]: > > On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 16:31 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > wpa_supplicant and NM already have Before=network.target which is even > > > stronger. But that doesn't help -- i

Re: [systemd-devel] Synchronization Between Services at Shutdown

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 16:31, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering [2015-04-02 15:31 +0200]: > > You need to order wpa_supplicant and NM Before=remote-fs-pre.target > > and pull it it via Wants=remote-fs-pre.target. With that in place > > during shutdown the mounts will be un

Re: [systemd-devel] Synchronization Between Services at Shutdown

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 16:28, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Lennart Poettering [2015-04-02 13:03 +0200]: > > Yeah, and rightfully so. I mean, a service really should be able to > > shutdown if dbus is dead. In fact, it should be able to shutdown in > > pretty much any situation... > > T

Re: [systemd-devel] Synchronization Between Services at Shutdown

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 15:04, Simon McVittie (simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk) wrote: > On 02/04/15 14:31, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > Hmm? I really don't see how the NFS vs wpa_supplicant issue has > > anything to do with dbus? NFS doesn't care about dbus at all... > > It does inasmuch as it requires

Re: [systemd-devel] FR: machine unit

2015-04-03 Thread Alexey Shabalin
2015-04-03 14:38 GMT+03:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Fri, 03.04.15 14:31, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote: > My plan is to add a concept of .nspawn files that may accompany > machine directories and contain additional settings that may then be > omitted on the command line. It has been

Re: [systemd-devel] FR: machine unit

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 03.04.15 14:31, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi. > > I have several containers with different setting. > For example: > systemd-nspawn@server1.service: > ExecStart=/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn --quiet --keep-unit --boot > --link-journal=try-guest --network-bridge=br140 > --b

[systemd-devel] FR: machine unit

2015-04-03 Thread Alexey Shabalin
Hi. I have several containers with different setting. For example: systemd-nspawn@server1.service: ExecStart=/usr/bin/systemd-nspawn --quiet --keep-unit --boot --link-journal=try-guest --network-bridge=br140 --bind=/srv/node:/srv/node --machine=%i systemd-nspawn@server2.service: ExecStart=/usr/bi

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd from git doesn't boot properly in fedora rawhide

2015-04-03 Thread Tom Gundersen
On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Jan Synáček wrote: > From the following commit onward, systemd doesn't boot properly in > Rawhide. Some device units time out and I'm then dropped into an > emergency shell. > > commit f4ac4d1a82e2c468761fffa23841ad886221 > Author: Tom Gundersen > Date: Wed

Re: [systemd-devel] Starting a unit on resume from suspend/hibernate

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 21:24, Dimitrios Apostolou (ji...@gmx.net) wrote: > >Usually if one wants to do that one is just working around some > >problems that are better solved in a different way. > > > >Why precisely do you need this feature? > > I need to properly terminate system accounting, in the sa

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd and smartd daemon

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 02.04.15 11:49, Al Lau (laua...@gmail.com) wrote: > As a test, the "/usr/sbin/smartd $smartd_opts" is invoked from the command > line and the daemon is forked and stayed up as expected. By default, the > /usr/sbin/smartd daemonize. Well, but does it do that correctly? i.e. does it *doubl

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 03.04.15 12:07, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote: > input_id already (tries to) tag accelerometers as such, but this only works > for absolute accelerometers. Recent kernels mark accelerometers through an > input prop. Trust that prop and always tag devices with it with > ID_INPUT

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Add reboot to EFI support

2015-04-03 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 03.04.15 12:40, Jan Janssen (medhe...@web.de) wrote: > Changes in v3: > - call the feature reboot to firmware everywhere > - make the login interface a property and methods to change it and >don't couple it with a reboot action > - changed/added policykit action defaulting to auth_a

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] Add reboot to EFI support

2015-04-03 Thread Jan Janssen
--- Hi, Changes in v3: - call the feature reboot to firmware everywhere - make the login interface a property and methods to change it and don't couple it with a reboot action - changed/added policykit action defaulting to auth_admin_keep. Please change this if something else is desired.

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
input_id already (tries to) tag accelerometers as such, but this only works for absolute accelerometers. Recent kernels mark accelerometers through an input prop. Trust that prop and always tag devices with it with ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER. Note that detection by the prop bit works the same as the e

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/1] udev: input_id: tag accelerometers as ID_INPUT_ACCELEROMETER

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, Note this patch depends on Peter Hutterer's recent patch titled: "udev: input_id: tag pointing sticks as ID_INPUT_POINTINGSTICK" Regards, Hans ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailm

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 1/5] udev-builtin-input_id: identify trackpoints and accelerometers

2015-04-03 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 02-04-15 12:27, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 02.04.15 12:21, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: On Thu, 02.04.15 11:48, Hans de Goede (hdego...@redhat.com) wrote: The kernel has been setting the INPUT_PROP_POINTING_STICK property bit on trackpoints for a while now

[systemd-devel] systemd from git doesn't boot properly in fedora rawhide

2015-04-03 Thread Jan Synáček
Hello, From the following commit onward, systemd doesn't boot properly in Rawhide. Some device units time out and I'm then dropped into an emergency shell. commit f4ac4d1a82e2c468761fffa23841ad886221 Author: Tom Gundersen Date: Wed Apr 1 13:55:20 2015 +0200 libudev: device - replace b

Re: [systemd-devel] Synchronization Between Services at Shutdown

2015-04-03 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello, Dan Williams [2015-04-02 9:51 -0500]: > On Thu, 2015-04-02 at 16:31 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote: > > wpa_supplicant and NM already have Before=network.target which is even > > stronger. But that doesn't help -- it's D-Bus which we need to leave > > running longer, as dbus going down early tea