Re: [systemd-devel] Is SystemCallFilter working for you?

Hello again, Martin Pitt [2015-06-09 13:00 +0200]: > I was about to (re-)enable seccomp support in our systemd packages, > and to write an integration test for it. However, it seems that this > currently does not seem to work at all. For the archives: Not sure what went wrong yesterday, today it

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH v2] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check

Patchset imported to github. To create a pull request, one of the main developers has to initiate one via: -- Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git ___

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v2] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check

I found an oversight in the previous v1 patch, found at http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-June/032796.html, that u->load_state == UNIT_ERROR in the error path of unit_load(), that is: int unit_load(Unit *u) { int r; .. fail: u->load_state = u->load_state

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 10:50 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: I would like to see us move and migrated the bugs to jira ( which is without >doubt the best and friendliest bug tracker I have found ) which integrates >nicely with github as well as move the community wiki to confluence to >strengthen collaborat

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

Filipe Brandenburger [2015-06-09 12:55 -0700]: > I think a more productive advice would be for reviewers to avoid using > line comments for anything that is wanted for posterity and instead > only use them to say "typo" or "comment here" or to point out what > exactly in the code the comment on the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check

From: HATAYAMA Daisuke Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:18:48 +0900 (JST) > From: Lennart Poettering > Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access > check > Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:3

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check

From: Lennart Poettering Subject: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:37:14 +0200 > On Mon, 08.06.15 19:00, HATAYAMA Daisuke (d.hatay...@jp.fujitsu.com) wrote: > >> Currently, SELinux unit access check is not performed if a given u

Re: [systemd-devel] nss-myhostname: why don't loopback interfaces appear?

On 9 June 2015 at 20:36, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Wed, 03.06.15 16:31, Daurnimator (q...@daurnimator.com) wrote: > >> On 3 June 2015 at 16:01, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > On Wed, 03.06.15 15:40, Daurnimator (q...@daurnimator.com) wrote: >> > >> >> I was playing around with nss, and found

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCHi V4] cryptsetup: craft a unique ID with the source device

On Mon, 01.06.15 17:26, har...@redhat.com (har...@redhat.com) wrote: > From: Harald Hoyer > > If cryptsetup is called with a source device as argv[3], then craft the > ID for the password agent with a unique device path. > > If possible "/dev/block/:" is used, otherwise the original > argv[3] i

Re: [systemd-devel] How many times is the root mounted in boot up?

On Mon, 01.06.15 20:43, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote: > I find: > > 1. systemd will generate a "-.mount" unit from /proc/self/mountsinfo > > 2. systemd will generate a "-.mount" unit by systemd-fstab-generator > > > > Q: > > * Which one takes priority? > > The latter, because it's a

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 09:44 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 09.06.15 21:11, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: We need to do proper QA to properly support and backup our downstream consumers ( distributions, embedded and otherwise) and that means tagging bugs by distributions, v

Re: [systemd-devel] Calling shutdown while executing a service

On Tue, 02.06.15 16:19, Christoph Pleger (christoph.ple...@cs.tu-dortmund.de) wrote: > Hello, > > I created a new target, defined by this target file: > > [Unit] > Description=LOCAL > Requires=multi-user.target > After=multi-user.target > Conflicts=rescue.target > AllowIsolate=yes > > The new

Re: [systemd-devel] 'Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning' when using ReadOnlyDirectories in multi-instance service file

On Thu, 04.06.15 18:22, nusenu (nus...@openmailbox.org) wrote: > >>> Error message: > >>> > >>> Failed at step NAMESPACE spawning /usr/bin/tor: No such > >>> file or directory service: main process exited, > >>> code=exited, status=226/NAMESPACE > > > > Any chance you

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 09:34 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 09.06.15 19:19, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, David Timothy Strauss wrote: Let's just try the GitHub tracker. I like how it associates issues with pull requests and supports auto-linking for

Re: [systemd-devel] Is SystemCallFilter working for you?

On Tue, 09.06.15 13:00, Martin Pitt (martin.p...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Hello all, > > I was about to (re-)enable seccomp support in our systemd packages, > and to write an integration test for it. However, it seems that this > currently does not seem to work at all. Works fine here. > config.h h

Re: [systemd-devel] Creating units using D-Bus

On Tue, 09.06.15 14:47, Stephen Gallagher (sgall...@redhat.com) wrote: > In order for ModifyUnit() to work, there also needs to be a way to > retrieve the current definition of the unit on the system. (And, > ideally, a way to retrieve this for any unit currently loaded into > systemd). "systemct

Re: [systemd-devel] Creating units using D-Bus

On Tue, 09.06.15 19:33, Jakub Skořepa (ja...@skorepa.info) wrote: > Hello, > My name is Jakub Skořepa and I'm working on Cockpit UI for Systemd > Timers. > > For that I need to create and modify systemd unit files. Cockpit uses D > -Bus for everything so I need D-Bus API for that. I think that it

Re: [systemd-devel] SyslogIdentifier does not work for messages printed with sd_journal_print

On Tue, 09.06.15 13:50, Martin Belanger (martin.belan...@cyaninc.com) wrote: > Hi Lennart, > > I found a workaround. When looking at the source code for sd_journal_print(), > I saw that SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER defaults to the string pointed to by > program_invocation_short_name > (defined in errno.h).

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, 09.06.15 14:54, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Tue, 09.06.15 13:04, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote: > >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Lennart Poettering > >> wrote: > >> > [

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 09.06.15 13:04, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Lennart Poettering >> wrote: >> > [...] so we comment and ask for a new PR, and close the old one. >> >> See my previous com

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, 09.06.15 21:11, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > We need to do proper QA to properly support and backup our downstream > consumers ( distributions, embedded and otherwise) and that means tagging > bugs by distributions, vendors, releases. I'd be very careful with start

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, 09.06.15 12:55, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote: > Moving from #88 to this thread: > > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > So I think updating the PR (by force-pushing) is really nasty, and we > > shouldn't do it. Instead, please push a new

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, 09.06.15 13:04, Filipe Brandenburger (filbran...@google.com) wrote: > On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > [...] so we comment and ask for a new PR, and close the old one. > > See my previous comment, I think this "cure" is worse than the > "disease" :-) Why

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, 09.06.15 19:19, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, David Timothy Strauss wrote: > >Let's just try the GitHub tracker. I like how it associates issues with > >pull requests and supports auto-linking for commit IDs, user names, and > >other issue numb

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 07:50 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Tue, 09.06.15 11:30, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: I would like to see us move and migrated the bugs to jira ( which is without doubt the best and friendliest bug tracker I have found ) which integrates nicely with githu

Re: [systemd-devel] SyslogIdentifier does not work for messages printed with sd_journal_print

Hi Lennart, I found a workaround. When looking at the source code for sd_journal_print(), I saw that SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER defaults to the string pointed to by program_invocation_short_name (defined in errno.h). So I simply create a new string with the text that I want to assign to SYSLOG_IDENTIFIER a

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:59 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > [...] so we comment and ask for a new PR, and close the old one. See my previous comment, I think this "cure" is worse than the "disease" :-) Instead, just reuse the same PR and use `git push -f` to ship new versions of the commits to

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

Usually, when a PR needs fixing, it is done in the same PR, and there may be need to rebase so that commit history is not polluted, hence git push -f On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 3:59 PM Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Tue, 09.06.15 18:42, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) > wrote: > > > Le

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, 09.06.15 18:42, David Timothy Strauss (da...@davidstrauss.net) wrote: > Let's just try the GitHub tracker. I like how it associates issues with > pull requests and supports auto-linking for commit IDs, user names, and > other issue numbers. Is there any serious use case for systemd upstrea

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

Moving from #88 to this thread: On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 12:41 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: > So I think updating the PR (by force-pushing) is really nasty, and we > shouldn't do it. Instead, please push a new PR, mention that it > obsoletes the old one. (of course, I wished that github would know

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Tue, 09.06.15 11:30, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote: > I would like to see us move and migrated the bugs to jira ( which is without > doubt the best and friendliest bug tracker I have found ) which integrates > nicely with github as well as move the community wiki to confluenc

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Wed, 03.06.15 10:39, Krzesimir Nowak (krzesi...@endocode.com) wrote: > Hi, > > I see that some patches from mailing list were imported as issues to > github.com (like this one - https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/16). > There's a problem with that - I can't update the PR anymore with foll

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] missing: add more btrfs defines

On Tue, 02.06.15 11:08, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote: For the sake of the archives, this got merged as: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/12 > --- > src/shared/missing.h | 28 > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/shared/

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, David Timothy Strauss wrote: Let's just try the GitHub tracker. I like how it associates issues with pull requests and supports auto-linking for commit IDs, user names, and other issue numbers. Is there any serious use case for systemd upstream it doesn't support? I ca

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 06:53 PM, Camilo Aguilar wrote: Oh please Jira no, it is too much and the user friendliness is highly arguable. Please do not top post and compared to bugzilla and the lack of proper oversight github and other issue tracker provide it's much better. JBG _

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 06:42 PM, David Timothy Strauss wrote: Let's just try the GitHub tracker. I like how it associates issues with pull requests and supports auto-linking for commit IDs, user names, and other issue numbers. Is there any serious use case for systemd upstream it doesn't support? What

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

Oh please Jira no, it is too much and the user friendliness is highly arguable. On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 8:46 AM "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > > > On 06/09/2015 11:57 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: > > On 06/09/2015 02:30 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > >> > > > > As of today we

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

Let's just try the GitHub tracker. I like how it associates issues with pull requests and supports auto-linking for commit IDs, user names, and other issue numbers. Is there any serious use case for systemd upstream it doesn't support? ___ systemd-devel m

Re: [systemd-devel] Creating units using D-Bus

On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 19:33 +0200, Jakub Skořepa wrote: > Hello, > My name is Jakub Skořepa and I'm working on Cockpit UI for Systemd > Timers. > > For that I need to create and modify systemd unit files. Cockpit uses > D > -Bus for everything so I need D-Bus API for that. I think that it > woul

Re: [systemd-devel] Use a specific device ?

On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 19:34 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Le 09. 06. 15 17:43, Dan Williams a écrit : > > On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 16:16 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >> Le 05. 06. 15 15:51, poma a écrit : > >>> On 05.06.2015 15:37, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Le 05. 06.

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check

On Tue, 09.06.15 17:01, Dominick Grift (dac.overr...@gmail.com) wrote: > Development has moved to github.com/systemd > > It is probably better to submit a Github Push Request there if you have not > done so already. Well, we still accept patches by mails to the mailing list. However we prefer g

[systemd-devel] Creating units using D-Bus

Hello, My name is Jakub Skořepa and I'm working on Cockpit UI for Systemd Timers. For that I need to create and modify systemd unit files. Cockpit uses D -Bus for everything so I need D-Bus API for that. I think that it would be beneficial if systemd was able to create unit files on-the-fly using

Re: [systemd-devel] Use a specific device ?

On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 16:16 +0200, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Le 05. 06. 15 15:51, poma a écrit : > > On 05.06.2015 15:37, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >> Le 05. 06. 15 15:09, poma a écrit : > >>> On 05.06.2015 14:14, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Le 05. 06. 15 13:18, Aleksander M

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] selinux: fix missing SELinux unit access check

Development has moved to github.com/systemd It is probably better to submit a Github Push Request there if you have not done so already. Thanks -- 02DFF788 4D30 903A 1CF3 B756 FB48 1514 3148 83A2 02DF F788 http://keys.gnupg.net/pks/lookup?op=vindex&search=0x314883A202DFF788 Dominick Grift p

Re: [systemd-devel] Is SystemCallFilter working for you?

On Tue, Jun 9, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Martin Pitt wrote: > Hello all, > > I was about to (re-)enable seccomp support in our systemd packages, > and to write an integration test for it. However, it seems that this > currently does not seem to work at all. > > config.h has HAVE_SECCOMP==1, and systemctl -

Re: [systemd-devel] siphash24 gives unmatched bloom_mask and bloom_filter?

Hi, David, I think I've found the reason for my problem. That is , with "arg0path=/p1/p2/p3", The sent signal should be sent with "arg0=/p1/p2/p3/", but not "arg0=/p1/p2/p3". Then Another question is, with "arg0path=/p1/p2", the signal sent with "arg0=/p1/p2/p3" should be received and

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 11:57 AM, Mihamina Rakotomandimby wrote: On 06/09/2015 02:30 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: As of today we've disabled git-push to fd.o. The official development git repository is now at github [1]. What about the bug tracker? Will it remain at fdo's bugzilla. I have to a

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 02:30 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: As of today we've disabled git-push to fd.o. The official development git repository is now at github [1]. What about the bug tracker? Will it remain at fdo's bugzilla. I have to admit I'm not a huge fan of github's bug tracker. I am not

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On 06/09/2015 11:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Mon, 01.06.15 22:43, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: 2015-06-01 20:12 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : Hi As of today we've disabled git-push to fd.o. The official development git repository is now at github [1]. What about the bug tra

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] zsh-completion: a more style/tag aware _systemctl

On Fri, 29.05.15 10:40, Eric Cook (l...@gmx.com) wrote: > using _wanted instead of calling compadd directly. this allows the user to > customize > possible matches. > > An example being, grouping units by type: > autoload -Uz compinit; compinit > zstyle ':completion:*' menu select > zstyle ':com

Re: [systemd-devel] [ANNOUNCE] Git development moved to github

On Mon, 01.06.15 22:43, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote: > 2015-06-01 20:12 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann : > > Hi > > > > As of today we've disabled git-push to fd.o. The official development > > git repository is now at github [1]. > > What about the bug tracker? Will it remain at fdo's bugzi

[systemd-devel] Is SystemCallFilter working for you?

Hello all, I was about to (re-)enable seccomp support in our systemd packages, and to write an integration test for it. However, it seems that this currently does not seem to work at all. config.h has HAVE_SECCOMP==1, and systemctl --version shows +SECCOMP, kernel has CONFIG_SECCOMP=y, CONFIG_HAV

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] random-util: guard including sys/auxv.h with the corresponding ifdef check

On Tue, 02.06.15 11:07, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de) wrote: > --- > src/shared/random-util.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/src/shared/random-util.c b/src/shared/random-util.c > index 88f5182508e7..b230044f5099 100644 > --- a/src/shared/random-util.c > +

Re: [systemd-devel] nss-myhostname: why don't loopback interfaces appear?

On Wed, 03.06.15 16:31, Daurnimator (q...@daurnimator.com) wrote: > On 3 June 2015 at 16:01, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Wed, 03.06.15 15:40, Daurnimator (q...@daurnimator.com) wrote: > > > >> I was playing around with nss, and found that my loopback interface ip > >> doesn't appear from nss

Re: [systemd-devel] SyslogIdentifier does not work for messages printed with sd_journal_print

On Tue, 02.06.15 20:31, Martin Belanger (martin.belan...@cyaninc.com) wrote: > I'm using systemd 219 (Ubuntu 15.04). > > I have three instances of a daemon running. I use SyslogIdentifier to > give each of them a unique identifier (e.g. myproc-1, myproc-2, > myproc-3). I also redirect stdout/std

Re: [systemd-devel] In what case will debugfs be mounted multi-times?

On Thu, 04.06.15 23:41, cee1 (fykc...@gmail.com) wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm running systemd v219 on a ARM board, and find following suspicious > log message: > """ > Jan 01 08:00:01 localhost unknown: c3 1 (systemd) systemd[1]: Mounting > Debug File System... > > Jan 01 08:00:01 localhost unknown: