Kay Sievers [2015-06-23 1:21 +0200]:
> Please test these setups locally if that model will work in your
> setups, and what would possibly need to be fixed in the git tree to
> make that easier for you.
Fine for Debian/Ubuntu. We've always rebuilt the autoconfiscation
anyway, and our build system
$ systemctl restart systemd-networkd
Failed to restart systemd-networkd.service: The name org.freedesktop.PolicyKit1
was not provided by any .service files
$ sudo systemctl restart systemd-networkd
Works.
Presumably this error message could be improved, in particular because that
name is indeed
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 23.06.15 01:21, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>>
>>> We currently considering to stop creating release tar balls.
>>>
>>> For build systems which still require them
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 23.06.15 01:21, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
>
>> We currently considering to stop creating release tar balls.
>>
>> For build systems which still require them, they can be created
>> locally from the upstream git repositor
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:21:36AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> We currently considering to stop creating release tar balls.
What's the motivation for this change? I suspect that with this, 'make
distcheck' will never again be run and it will eventually break
build configurations which don't align
On Tue, 23.06.15 01:21, Kay Sievers (k...@vrfy.org) wrote:
> We currently considering to stop creating release tar balls.
>
> For build systems which still require them, they can be created
> locally from the upstream git repository with:
> git archive --format=tar --prefix=systemd-$(VERSION)/
We currently considering to stop creating release tar balls.
For build systems which still require them, they can be created
locally from the upstream git repository with:
git archive --format=tar --prefix=systemd-$(VERSION)/ $(VERSION) | \
xz > systemd-$(VERSION).tar.xz
These tar balls wil
I can import-tar, list-images, image-status, start, rename, and remove, but
> sudo machinectl clone depot depot2
Could not clone image: Access denied
Am I doing this wrong?
This is systemd 221-1 on Arch.
$ sudo machinectl list-images
NAME TYPE RO USAGE CREATED MOD
On Mon, 22.06.15 23:16, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
> Are audit messages in _TRANSPORT=audit in systemd 219, or later only?
Since day #1 of the native audit support they are _TRANSPORT=audit,
hence also in v219.
Note thought that the kernel also copies audit msgs to kmsg --
Kay Sievers wrote on 20/06/15 20:49:
> On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 6:08 PM, cee1 wrote:
>> 2015-06-20 2:06 GMT+08:00 Lennart Poettering :
>>> On Fri, 19.06.15 16:06, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>>>
Heya!
It's primarily a bugfix release, but we also make sd-bus.h a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Are audit messages in _TRANSPORT=audit in systemd 219, or later only?
W dniu 2015-06-22 o 23:07, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sat, 20.06.15 00:57, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl)
> wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am curious if it is possible
On Mon, 22.06.15 14:49, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Lukáš Nykrýn writes:
>
> > Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200:
> >> Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or
> >> network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it
> >> act
On Sat, 20.06.15 00:57, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am curious if it is possible or planned to add support for pattern
> matching and/or negation matching in journal? for example I would like
> to view everything except audit entries.
> Actually, when we are at
On Sat, 20.06.15 17:35, Thomas Meyer (tho...@m3y3r.de) wrote:
> > Also don't forget the magic SysRq keys – Alt+SysRq+F will run the OOM
> > killer in case of heavy swapping, Alt+SysRq+E/I will sigterm/sigkill
> > all programs (systemd will restart gettys afterwards), and
> > Alt+SysRq+N will re
On Sat, 20.06.15 10:18, Kevin Wilson (wkev...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I can set a hostname with
> hostnamectl set-hostname --static newHostname
>
> I have a DNS domain server in my local LAN. so
>
> when I restart the machine, it gets this full hostname, which can be
> displayed by
>
>
>
On Mon, 22.06.15 10:36, Johannes Ernst (johannes.er...@gmail.com) wrote:
> What’s the difference between
> machinectl start foo
> and
> systemctl start systemd-nspawn@foo
> ? They look the same to me.
They are pretty much, as the man page even says.
It's a bit nicer to user "machinectl
What’s the difference between
machinectl start foo
and
systemctl start systemd-nspawn@foo
? They look the same to me.
Thanks,
Johannes.
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/l
Lukáš Nykrýn writes:
> Jan Synáček píše v Čt 18. 06. 2015 v 15:41 +0200:
>> Is remote-fs.target somehow dependent/ordered on network.target or
>> network-online.target? I can't find anything that would suggest it
>> actually is.
>>
>> Cheers,
>
> If I am not mistaken remote-fs.target should be a
18 matches
Mail list logo
