В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:30:53 +
"Hoyer, Marko (ADITG/SW2)" пишет:
> Hi all,
>
> jumping from systemd 206 to systemd 211 we were faced with some issue, which
> are finally caused by a changed main loop priority of the job execution.
>
> Our use case is the following one:
> --
В Wed, 15 Jul 2015 23:03:02 +0800
sean пишет:
> Hi All:
> I am trying to test the latest upstream kernel, But i encounter a
> strange issue about systemd.
> When the "systemd" extracted from initrd image mounts the real root file
> system "hda.img" on "/sysroot" and changes root to the ne
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 08:22:03PM +0200, Thomas Meyer wrote:
> diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
> b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
> index 5ab03fc..0b14bb4 100644
> --- a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
> +++ b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
> ACTION=="rem
Resurrection of related thread "systemd and nested Btrfs subvolumes" from March:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2015-March/029666.html
The question:
I understand the argument for subvolumes for containers below
/var/lib/machines. I don't understand what feature(s) of Btrfs
sub
Hi David,
On Fri Apr 10 05:17:37 PDT 2015, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
As it has been discussed in the systemd hackfest during the Linux Conference
Europe, one daemon could centralize the management of all network proxy
configurations. Idea is something user can do per-application (like in
firefox
diff --git a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
index 5ab03fc..0b14bb4 100644
--- a/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
+++ b/rules/60-persistent-storage.rules
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
ACTION=="remove", GOTO="persistent_storage_end"
SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="persistent_
Hi David,
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
+ - support IPv6
This we should probably have from the beginning, any reason you kept
it IPv4 only for now (apart from keeping it simple as a POC)?
Wow, yeah. This far into the 21st century, you basically have to go out
of yo
Hi David,
+static int method_find_proxy(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *message,
void *userdata, sd_bus_error *error) {
+_cleanup_free_ char *p = strdup("DIRECT");
+Manager *m = userdata;
+int r;
+
+assert(bus);
+assert(message);
+assert(m);
+
+
On Fri Apr 10 06:26:57 PDT 2015, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
> > + - support IPv6
>
> This we should probably have from the beginning, any reason you kept
> it IPv4 only for now (apart from keeping it simple as a POC)?
Wow, yeah. This far in
>
> +static int method_find_proxy(sd_bus *bus, sd_bus_message *message,
> void *userdata, sd_bus_error *error) {
> +_cleanup_free_ char *p = strdup("DIRECT");
> +Manager *m = userdata;
> +int r;
> +
> +assert(bus);
> +assert(message);
> +assert(m);
On Fri Apr 10 05:17:37 PDT 2015, Tomasz Bursztyka wrote:
> As it has been discussed in the systemd hackfest during the Linux Conference
> Europe, one daemon could centralize the management of all network proxy
> configurations. Idea is something user can do per-application (like in
> firefox for i
On 11.06.2015 16:54, Francis Moreau wrote:
> On 06/11/2015 01:40 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 2:26 PM, Francis Moreau
>> wrote:
>
>$ systemd-analyze critical-chain
>
>graphical.target @7.921s
> multi-user.target @7.921s
>autof
why does systemd *randomly* try to create "RuntimeDirectory"
for "ExecStartPost" and so terminates a perfectly up and running service
because the "file exists" error?
Fedora 21 as well as Fedora 22
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226509#c3
Jul 15 16:19:43 rawhide systemd: Stopping
13 matches
Mail list logo
