Re: [systemd-devel] systemd 225: cannot override nspawn service

2015-09-09 Thread Ruben Kerkhof
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:48 AM, crequill wrote: > 1/ I cannot login anymore on containers (/sbin/getatty exist in container): > Failed to get login PTY: No such file or directory No idea about your other issues, but I hit this one too and it is fixed in systemd 2.26. Kind regards, Ruben __

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd 225: cannot override nspawn service

2015-09-09 Thread crequill
In container boot with : systemd-nspawn -bD /var/lib/machines/ci-container/ -n /sys/class/net show the host interfaces (enp3s1f0, ...) ip link show only the interfaces lo and host0 (as desired) Perhaps it's why netctl doesn't see the host0 interface 2015-09-09 11:48 GMT+02:00 creq

Re: [systemd-devel] .nspawn settings files

2015-09-09 Thread Alexey Shabalin
2015-09-09 9:39 GMT+03:00 Lennart Poettering : > On Tue, 08.09.15 22:57, Alexey Shabalin (a.shaba...@gmail.com) wrote: > > > 2015-09-08 16:32 GMT+03:00 David Herrmann : > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Here's the next version of systemd, v226: > > > * nspawn learnt support for .nspawn settings fil

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd 225: cannot override nspawn service

2015-09-09 Thread crequill
Hi, All was running fine with systemd 218. With nspawn systemd 225, always on archlinux, I've a lot of problems: 1/ I cannot login anymore on containers (/sbin/getatty exist in container): Failed to get login PTY: No such file or directory 2/ override of nspwawn file seems not to be charged (see

Re: [systemd-devel] Possible confusion with socket activation and daemon own configuration

2015-09-09 Thread Francis Moreau
On 09/08/2015 07:48 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On 08/09/15 13:55, Francis Moreau wrote: >> On 09/08/2015 12:09 PM, Richard Maw wrote: >>> I understood that the common configuration for socket activated sshd was to >>> have a sshd.service for if you want it to always be running, and a pair of >>> s

Re: [systemd-devel] /dev or /tmp disappears when program is running

2015-09-09 Thread Steven Shiau
On 9/9/2015 PM 02:22, Steven Shiau wrote: Well, you see that "bcache-probe" is invoked right before things go bad? Whatever that is, maybe that's the problem? Have you tried turning that rules file off? Thanks. Yes, a few hours ago I disabled it by removing bcache-tools, and the issue still re