On 23/10/15 21:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Can a container name be all-numeric?
> We make the same restrictions on container names as on host names. And
> that means all-numeric is OK.
Ahh, so there goes the idea of just using heuristics (i.e. am I looking
at a string of digits only) to deter
Hi all,
I am getting some core dumps when I am running the timedatectl command. I am
using 32 bit iso in qemu and I can only reproduce the error when I set the vm
to this particular mac address fe:f1:f0:61:1f:55 . Here is the core dump:
timedatectl
Local time: Fri 2015-10-23 13:38:22 EDT
Uni
Hi all,
First off, I apologize for starting so many threads here. I'm working on
becoming intimately familiar with systemd and all its capabilities, and
have run into numerous questions and issues. This list has been
incredibly helpful, thank you all!!
Now, the issue. When I use `systemd-ana
On 2015-10-23 12:29, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Chris Bell wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system? Basically, I'd
like to be able to see, relatively clearly, what targets are r
On 2015-10-23 12:23, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
23.10.2015 19:02, Chris Bell пишет:
Hi all,
I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system?
For starting something "systemd --test" shows all static dependencies
pulled in by startinggive
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Chris Bell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
> dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system? Basically, I'd
> like to be able to see, relatively clearly, what targets are reached and
> when, what services a
23.10.2015 19:02, Chris Bell пишет:
Hi all,
I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system?
For starting something "systemd --test" shows all static dependencies
pulled in by startinggiven unit. For stopping something I do not think
Hi all,
I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system? Basically, I'd
like to be able to see, relatively clearly, what targets are reached and
when, what services are wanted/required by the target, and some
dependencies between services
B1;4201;0cOn Fri, 23.10.15 14:24, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Yeah, I was referring to UUCP, since it's the same kind of hop-by-hop
> source-routing.
>
> (Admittedly, ":" was used the same way in Berknet...)
>
> Though, wouldn't containers just run sshd themselves? Or is this m
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 23.10.15 14:03, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Lennart Poettering <
> lenn...@poettering.net>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 23.10.15 00:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net
On Fri, 23.10.15 13:04, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Fri, 23.10.15 09:07, Stuart Longland (stua...@longlandclan.id.au) wrote:
>
> > On 23/10/15 08:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >> Because the syntax of -H parameter is "[user@]host[:container]"
> > >> and it does not allo
On Fri, 23.10.15 14:03, Mantas Mikulėnas (graw...@gmail.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 23.10.15 00:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Am 23.10.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Ivan Shapovalov:
> > > >On 2015-10-2
On Fri, 23.10.15 09:07, Stuart Longland (stua...@longlandclan.id.au) wrote:
> On 23/10/15 08:59, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >> Because the syntax of -H parameter is "[user@]host[:container]"
> >> and it does not allow specifying an explicit port number.
> >
> > [user@]host[:container][:port]
> > [use
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 1:55 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 23.10.15 00:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Am 23.10.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Ivan Shapovalov:
> > >On 2015-10-22 at 23:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > >>[...]
> > >>and why not simply "timedatect
On Fri, 23.10.15 00:59, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.10.2015 um 00:39 schrieb Ivan Shapovalov:
> >On 2015-10-22 at 23:12 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> >>[...]
> >>and why not simply "timedatectl -H user@host[:port]" since host:port
> >>is
> >>a well known protocol ag
On Fri, 23.10.15 00:07, Mikhail Kasimov (mikhail.kasi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hello!
>
> 1. systemd services have a special key (-H) to connect to remote host
> via ssh. E.g. 'timedatectl -H user@host'. By default port 22 is used.
> But in very often cases admins change the default ssh-port in
> s
On Fri, 23.10.15 10:49, yan...@iscas.ac.cn (yan...@iscas.ac.cn) wrote:
> hello guys. The systemd 208 has a service
> -systemd---readahead-collect.service but it does not start in
> boot-time.while, The systemd 219 has a similar service named
> ureadahead.service and it starts in about 2s in boot-t
17 matches
Mail list logo