On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:00:55PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 3:14 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 19.04.16 22:47, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
> >
> >> In some ancient bug or lkml I'd read a kernel maintainer say that the
> >> hibernation ima
Hello,
I have an issue with possible conflicts between systemd and a SLURM
scheduler cgroup management. SLURM ca be configured to use a few cgroup
subsystems like freezer, cpuset and memory. The daemon itself runs in the
root of the memory tree, but it creates entries (subdirectories) for child
p
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 03:00:16PM +0200, Yuri D'Elia wrote:
> On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >> Just as a curiosity though, is there some logic in the link numbers
> >> given? All my links are _3[123]. Since I just need to emit some
> >> notifications for the time being, knowing
I have to add, I don't quite understand, why the convenience libs are
split up like this:
> libbasic.la
> libshared.la
> libfirewall.la
> libcore.la
> libsystemd-internal.la
> libsystemd-network.la
> libudev-internal.la
> libudev-core.la
> libjournal-core.la
> libsystemd-journal-internal.la
> lib
2016-05-17 10:36 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering :
> On Mon, 16.05.16 04:24, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>
>> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require 300K+
>> ?
>> What's up with systemd-analyze?
>
> it embedds much of PID1's logic actually, in orde
On 15 May 2016 at 08:11, James Hogarth wrote:
>
> On 15 May 2016 06:32, "Andrei Borzenkov" wrote:
> >
> > 15.05.2016 06:36, Chris Murphy пишет:
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 12:38 PM, James Hogarth <
> james.hoga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> On 2 May 2016 18:58, "James Hogarth" wrote:
> >
On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> Just as a curiosity though, is there some logic in the link numbers
>> given? All my links are _3[123]. Since I just need to emit some
>> notifications for the time being, knowing that _XY have the same
>> sequence as what is listed by networkctl wo
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Michael Biebl [2016-05-16 4:24 +0200]:
>> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require 300K+
>> ?
>> Could we move more common functionality into a shared, private library
>> to counter the constant growth?
>
> Buil
On Mon, 16.05.16 04:24, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
> Any ideas, why simple tools like loginctl, busctl, hostnamectl require 300K+ ?
> What's up with systemd-analyze?
it embedds much of PID1's logic actually, in order to do unit file
checking.
> Could we move more common funct
On Tue, 17.05.16 00:14, Yuri D'Elia (wav...@thregr.org) wrote:
> On Mon, May 16 2016, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > That's actually the interface index formatted as integer
> > string. However, since D-Bus does not allow object path components to
> > start with a number it it is escaped with an un
10 matches
Mail list logo
