On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 6:23 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I'm playing using systemd-networkd (rather than the legacy network
> service) on my Banana Pi CentOS 7 firewall. (See the "Bouncing
> interface once chrony is synced" thread for background.)
>
> […]
>
> For some reason, though, only the IPv4
11.07.2017 05:33, Paul D. DeRocco пишет:
> That is, I want a rule for creating a symlink that describes the USB port
> something is plugged into, rather than the specific device plugged into
> it. Linux USB has a way of representing the location of each physical
> jack, even when hubs are involved.
I'm playing using systemd-networkd (rather than the legacy network
service) on my Banana Pi CentOS 7 firewall. (See the "Bouncing
interface once chrony is synced" thread for background.)
I have "DHCP=yes" in the [Network] section of my WAN interface
(eth0.256.network):
[Match]
Name=eth0.256
That is, I want a rule for creating a symlink that describes the USB port
something is plugged into, rather than the specific device plugged into
it. Linux USB has a way of representing the location of each physical
jack, even when hubs are involved. For devices like USB serial and USB
MIDI, I'd li
Aha! Many thanks Zbyszek
On 11 July 2017 at 02:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:55:21AM +0100, Neil MacLeod wrote:
> > I see that with the following commit, 'StartLimitInterval' is aliased to
> > 'StartLimitIntervalSec':
> >
> > https://github.com/systemd/syste
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:55:21AM +0100, Neil MacLeod wrote:
> I see that with the following commit, 'StartLimitInterval' is aliased to
> 'StartLimitIntervalSec':
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/f0367da7d1a61ad698a55d17b5c28ddce0dc265a#diff-b3e16bf39e5d7ab233077b9b1dafb095
>
> This
I see that with the following commit, 'StartLimitInterval' is aliased to
'StartLimitIntervalSec':
https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/f0367da7d1a61ad698a55d17b5c28ddce0dc265a#diff-b3e16bf39e5d7ab233077b9b1dafb095
This change should be in systemd-230.
However, using 'StartLimitIntervalSec`
On Mon, Jul 10 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hey Neil,
>
> On 07/04/2017 06:20 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Tue, May 30 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>>
>> For those who aren't cl
On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 03:49:11AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 03:54:09PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 10:34:22PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 02:35:16PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wr
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 7:03 PM, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 10:29:21AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> > I am using CentOS 7 (systemd 219) on a Banana Pi as my residential
> > firewall/gateway. The Banana Pi does not have a persistent clock, so
> > it has no idea what the t
On Mon, 10.07.17 17:45, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 06:40:00PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Mon, 10.07.17 18:36, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> >
> > > > After all (as other people said) systemd has no such requ
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 06:40:00PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 10.07.17 18:36, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
> > > After all (as other people said) systemd has no such requirements
> > > itself. It is true that such user names are confusing and
> > > non-porta
On Mon, 10.07.17 15:29, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> > On current Fedora, the current regex useradd enforces appears to be
> > this:
> >
> > [a-zA-Z0-9._][a-zA-Z0-9._-]{0,30}[a-zA-Z0-9._-$]?
> >
> > If I read things correctly at least... (the trailing $ appears to
On Mon, 10.07.17 18:36, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> > After all (as other people said) systemd has no such requirements
> > itself. It is true that such user names are confusing and
> > non-portable, but if the local admin has or wants to have such an
> > account for whate
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On current Fedora, the current regex useradd enforces appears to be
> this:
>
> [a-zA-Z0-9._][a-zA-Z0-9._-]{0,30}[a-zA-Z0-9._-$]?
So, it *does* allow for usernames starting with numbers...
___
On 07/10/2017 03:43 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
If your DHCP client implementation gets confused by the wallclock not
being steady then this appears to be a bug in the
implementation. Given that there are so many DHCP clients to choose
from, maybe use a different one?
Oh, it's definitely a bu
On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 10:29:21AM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote:
> I am using CentOS 7 (systemd 219) on a Banana Pi as my residential
> firewall/gateway. The Banana Pi does not have a persistent clock, so
> it has no idea what the time is until it is able to sync via NTP. Thus,
> the initial DHCP lea
Hey Neil,
On 07/04/2017 06:20 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, May 30 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>
> For those who aren't closely watching systemd development, a
> patch was rece
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 05:03:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 10.07.17 22:23, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
>
> > > Well, it took 3 years or so, until someone noticed the strict rules we
> > > enforce. I seriously doubt that naming system users in such unsafe
> >
On Mon, 10.07.17 22:23, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
> > Well, it took 3 years or so, until someone noticed the strict rules we
> > enforce. I seriously doubt that naming system users in such unsafe
> > ways is really that wide-spread usage.
>
> That _could_ be because people t
On Mon, 10.07.17 15:58, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> On Mon, 10.07.17 15:16, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > Now, because this is so weakly defined, we hence do not follow POSIX
> > > rul
Am Montag, den 10.07.2017, 12:57 +0200 schrieb Reindl Harald:
>
> Am 10.07.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
> >
> >
> > The "nobody" user has special semantics on Linux: it's where things
> > are mapped to that can't be mapped otherwise. It's used by user
> > namspacing, by NFS and othe
On Mon, 10.07.17 15:16, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > Now, because this is so weakly defined, we hence do not follow POSIX
> > rules, but filter out more that might be dangerous. Specifically:
> >
> > 1. We do not perm
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 12:42 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> Now, because this is so weakly defined, we hence do not follow POSIX
> rules, but filter out more that might be dangerous. Specifically:
>
> 1. We do not permit empty usernames
> 2. We don't permit the first character to be numeric
>
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 10.07.17 21:15, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
Now, I do think that systemd has the duty to complain about any system
user names outside of the safe range. Not only for security reasons,
but also for portability and compati
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 10.07.17 21:51, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
This all stems from my experiences with PulseAudio back in the day:
People do not grok the effect of fork(): it only duplicates the
invoking thread, not any other threads of th
On Mon, 10.07.17 21:51, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
> > This all stems from my experiences with PulseAudio back in the day:
> > People do not grok the effect of fork(): it only duplicates the
> > invoking thread, not any other threads of the process, moreover all
> > data struc
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 08.07.17 16:24, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
In doing some casual journalctl profiling and stracing, it became apparent
that `journalctl -b --no-pager` runs across a signifi
On Mon, 10.07.17 21:15, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
> > Now, I do think that systemd has the duty to complain about any system
> > user names outside of the safe range. Not only for security reasons,
> > but also for portability and compatibility reasons: I think we should
> >
On Sat, 08.07.17 16:24, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jul 2017, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> > In doing some casual journalctl profiling and stracing, it became apparent
> > that `journalctl -b --no-pager` runs across a significant quantity of logs,
> > ~10% of the ti
On Fri, 07.07.17 14:35, vcap...@pengaru.com (vcap...@pengaru.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 01:49:54PM -0700, vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 07, 2017 at 08:37:08PM +, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
> > > Back when that commit was made, didn't glibc cache the getpid() result in
> >
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 06.07.17 13:21, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 01:43:32AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
well, it even don't look but pretend it can't while it d
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 12:47:24 +0200, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 12:14 PM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
...
> > Yes, please, any rules for symlinks which should be created under
> > /dev/disk for DM devices (including all its subsystems like LVM,
> > mpath...) should go into 13-dm-disk.rules that
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 06.07.17 09:36, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
User=0day fails a syntactic validation, not a semantic validation. systemd
never even checks to see whether the user exists when the unit is loaded.
And nor should it! The user
Am 10.07.2017 um 12:42 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
(I do accept though that it's a valid discussion whether systemd's
current behaviour of warning and skipping invalid User= rvalues is the
best choice, instead of erroring out completely.)
and *that* is the real point of the whole issue - if o
Am 10.07.2017 um 12:55 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Thu, 06.07.17 10:34, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
Am 06.07.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
Reindl Harald:
> at least fall back to “nobody”
Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
> That idea is wrong.
>
> h
On Thu, 06.07.17 10:34, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.07.2017 um 09:59 schrieb Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
> > Reindl Harald:
> > > at least fall back to “nobody”
> >
> > Jonathan de Boyne Pollard:
> > > That idea is wrong.
> > >
> > > https://news.ycombinator.com
On 07/10/2017 12:14 PM, Peter Rajnoha wrote:
> On 07/10/2017 11:53 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Mon, 10.07.17 11:37, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback, Lennart...
>>>
>>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:38:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 05.07
On Thu, 06.07.17 13:21, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 01:43:32AM +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> > > well, it even don't look but pretend it can't while it does which is
> > > the worst type of ope
On Thu, 06.07.17 09:36, Michael Chapman (m...@very.puzzling.org) wrote:
> User=0day fails a syntactic validation, not a semantic validation. systemd
> never even checks to see whether the user exists when the unit is loaded.
> And nor should it! The user must be allowed to not exist at unit-load t
On 07/10/2017 11:53 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 10.07.17 11:37, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback, Lennart...
>>
>> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:38:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 05.07.17 13:01, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
>>
On Mon, 10.07.17 11:37, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
> Thanks for the feedback, Lennart...
>
> On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:38:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 05.07.17 13:01, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
> >
> > > Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order t
Thanks for the feedback, Lennart...
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 10:38:38 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 05.07.17 13:01, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
>
> > Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order to locate the journal
> > partition from a given OSD partition. For details, see
Il giorno lun 10 lug 2017 alle 10:46, Lennart Poettering
ha scritto:
On Tue, 04.07.17 12:28, Federico Bruni (f...@inventati.org) wrote:
I'm building fedora-26 in a directory.
I want to add a normal user, so I've added to mkosi.postinst:
useradd dev -p mypassword
usermod dev -a -G wheel
On Tue, 04.07.17 20:33, Mariusz Wojcik (m6woj...@outlook.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I’m just asking because of the latest “not-a-bug” [1]. As far as I
> know, there aren’t many services that need full root access (maybe
> for getting a low port number). Except for that I don’t see many use
> cases. Th
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:38:38AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 05.07.17 13:01, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
>
> > Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order to locate the journal
> > partition from a given OSD partition. For details, see
> > http://tracker.ceph.com/iss
Am 10.07.2017 um 10:49 schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 04.07.17 20:33, Mariusz Wojcik (m6woj...@outlook.com) wrote:
Hi,
I’m just asking because of the latest “not-a-bug” [1]. As far as I
know, there aren’t many services that need full root access (maybe
for getting a low port number). Ex
On Tue, 04.07.17 12:28, Federico Bruni (f...@inventati.org) wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I hope this is the right place to ask questions about mkosi.
Hmm, not really. We currently have no mailing list for mkosi
though. Maybe the github issue tracker of mkosi would be the best
place to discuss things like
On Wed, 05.07.17 13:01, David Disseldorp (dd...@suse.de) wrote:
> Ceph relies on by-partuuid symlinks, in order to locate the journal
> partition from a given OSD partition. For details, see
> http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/19489.
This appears way too broad, as it would apply to all LVM and all o
On Wed, 05.07.17 10:29, Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) wrote:
> I am using CentOS 7 (systemd 219) on a Banana Pi as my residential
> firewall/gateway. The Banana Pi does not have a persistent clock, so
> it has no idea what the time is until it is able to sync via NTP. Thus,
> the initial DH
On Thu, 06.07.17 10:56, Lars Kellogg-Stedman (l...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I'm running on a kernel with CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED=y. I understand that
> this is counter to the recommendation in the README ("We recommend to turn
> off Real-Time group scheduling in the kernel when using systemd"), but
51 matches
Mail list logo