Thanks to you all. I wasn't aware of the stable branches. Nice to see them.
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 4:06 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:34 AM Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are on systemd 239 and we would like to patch following CVEs
> > without j
After some experimentation I came to realize that it is not possible
to send a response to a message at later time
if handler is registered with sd_bus_add_object_vtable for some object
and interface. The message must be processed
and reply send in function that given to sd_bus_vtable. To work arou
On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 9:34 AM Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> We are on systemd 239 and we would like to patch following CVEs
> without jumping to 240.
>
> CVE-2018-16864
> CVE-2018-16865
> CVE-2018-16866
>
> Can someone please help us out and point the commits that we need to
> bac
Am 2019-01-24 15:34, schrieb Umut Tezduyar Lindskog:
Hello,
We are on systemd 239 and we would like to patch following CVEs
without jumping to 240.
CVE-2018-16864
CVE-2018-16865
CVE-2018-16866
Can someone please help us out and point the commits that we need to
back-port since 239 was tagged?
Am 24.01.19 um 15:34 schrieb Umut Tezduyar Lindskog:
> Hello,
>
> We are on systemd 239 and we would like to patch following CVEs
> without jumping to 240.
>
> CVE-2018-16864
> CVE-2018-16865
> CVE-2018-16866
>
> Can someone please help us out and point the commits that we need to
> back-port
Hello,
We are on systemd 239 and we would like to patch following CVEs
without jumping to 240.
CVE-2018-16864
CVE-2018-16865
CVE-2018-16866
Can someone please help us out and point the commits that we need to
back-port since 239 was tagged?
Thanks
Umut
__
