On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:33:35 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Sa, 22.05.21 13:50, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > All in all, this stack would replace the usual stack where
> > /bin/login runs directly on the TTY of a VT, allowing to use a more
> > featureful terminal, cust
On Friday, May 28, 2021 3:13:17 AM EDT Pekka Paalanen wrote:
> On Thu, 27 May 2021 17:33:35 +0200
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> > On Sa, 22.05.21 13:50, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > All in all, this stack would replace the usual stack where
> > > /bin/login runs direct
When a socket service runs is there a way to determine the socket
state? If the socket file contains:
Accept=true
does systemd call accept with the socket before execing the service in
which case I don't have to call accept? Is there a way to
differentiate a socket with Accept set to true versus o
On Fri, 28 May 2021 at 21:27, Ted Toth wrote:
> When a socket service runs is there a way to determine the socket
> state? If the socket file contains:
> Accept=true
>
> does systemd call accept with the socket before execing the service in
> which case I don't have to call accept?
Yes, with Ac
Hello,
We would like to have a ROFS volume on which the whole fs is and writeable
config volume on which with have the same /etc.
Current kernel is 5.11
I have done an /etc/ overlay using the service var-volatile-etc for the RO FS.
And then added another service to either mount the config /etc on
