Julian Sikorski wrote on 28/09/2021 07:37:
W dniu 27.09.2021 o 16:38, François Cami pisze:
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 4:05 PM Julian Sikorski
wrote:
Hi list,
I am trying to set up an automount of my samba share. It works when I go
by the IP address, i.e.
//192.168.0.220/julian /mnt/openm
On Di, 28.09.21 12:26, lejeczek (pelj...@yahoo.co.uk) wrote:
> Hi guys.
>
> I have 'clevis' set to get luks pin from 'tang' but unlock does not happen
> at/during boot time and I wonder if someone can share thoughts on how to
> investigate that?
> I cannot see anything obvious fail during boot, mo
Hmm, changes to the service side (for prefix) would be a bit difficult at
the moment. And moreover the journal is a bit luxurious where we get the
timestamp, hostname, process name and it's PID. So I would like to have
that luxury in the logs.
I have a thought raised from your suggestion. Is it fi
On Mo, 27.09.21 15:40, Arjun D R (drarju...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi Folks,
>
> Currently we are using systemd-journald for service logging. We run
> journalctl for a bunch of services and redirect those to the custom log
> files for every few seconds. This takes up the CPU for that particular
> tim
Hi guys.
I have 'clevis' set to get luks pin from 'tang' but unlock
does not happen at/during boot time and I wonder if someone
can share thoughts on how to investigate that?
I cannot see anything obvious fail during boot, moreover,
manual 'clevis-luks-unlock' works no problems.
many thanks,
On Di, 28.09.21 19:44, Leon Fauster (leonfaus...@googlemail.com) wrote:
> Hallo Lennart, corresponding to your last post about FDE:
>
> On an EFI system - would an encrypted "/boot" or /boot on
> an encrypted "/" filesystem eliminate the mentioned main
> attack vector? The whole chain would be aut
Hallo Lennart, corresponding to your last post about FDE:
On an EFI system - would an encrypted "/boot" or /boot on
an encrypted "/" filesystem eliminate the mentioned main
attack vector? The whole chain would be authenticated.
firmware->shim->bootloader/grub2->{manual
interaction/password}->LU
Hi Lennart,
That's a good idea but still I would like to have the prefix as it is in
the journal . I understand it is impossible to bypass the journal and
expect the direct logging to be the same as journal entries. We can achieve
it through socket but still we cannot have the luxurious prefix as
