Re: [systemd-devel] Resolver times out resending with same transaction ID

2023-03-23 Thread Petr Menšík
On 3/21/23 06:32, Vince Del Vecchio wrote: Hi all, I recently observed reverse IPv4 address lookups timing out on a newly configured host. (Ubuntu 22.04LTS, systemd 249.11-0ubuntu3.7). I tracked the problem to the DVE-2018-0001 mitigation code. An example: $ resolvectl query 151.101.1.164 15

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-resolved: performance question

2023-03-23 Thread Petr Menšík
Hi Robert, interesting. It seems resolved is not expecting so heavy usage. Consider other cache until this is fixed, unbound or dnsmasq might be a good choice. Please create an issue for it on https://github.com/systemd/systemd. Especially when it can use the fact it is a deamon, it should be

Re: [systemd-devel] CPUAffinity=all ?

2023-03-23 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
My wild guess would be "no", in order to remain compatible with CPUs that might be added to the system at runtime. On Thu, Mar 23, 2023, 23:00 Etienne Champetier wrote: > Le jeu. 23 mars 2023 à 16:37, Etienne Champetier > a écrit : > > > > Hello, > > > > I'm setting `CPUAffinity=0-1` in /etc/sy

Re: [systemd-devel] CPUAffinity=all ?

2023-03-23 Thread Etienne Champetier
Le jeu. 23 mars 2023 à 16:37, Etienne Champetier a écrit : > > Hello, > > I'm setting `CPUAffinity=0-1` in /etc/systemd/system.conf, this works great. > Now, I want one of my units to set CPUAffinity to all available CPUs, > without knowing the number of CPUs. > Using `CPUAffinity=` reset the sett

[systemd-devel] CPUAffinity=all ?

2023-03-23 Thread Etienne Champetier
Hello, I'm setting `CPUAffinity=0-1` in /etc/systemd/system.conf, this works great. Now, I want one of my units to set CPUAffinity to all available CPUs, without knowing the number of CPUs. Using `CPUAffinity=` reset the setting but we are still inheriting from the parent so I still have `Cpus_all

Re: [systemd-devel] systemd-devel Digest, Vol 155, Issue 8

2023-03-23 Thread Lal, Arun
Hi Lennart, In function check_access I see the following code. if (c->vtable->flags & SD_BUS_VTABLE_UNPRIVILEGED) return 0; Can you tell me what is the right way to mark a dbus-interface as SD_BUS_VTABLE_UNPRIVILEGED? Because marking it as SD_BUS_VTABLE_UNPRIVILEGED means my no

Re: [systemd-devel] Unsubscribing doesn't work.

2023-03-23 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
That issue is mostly caused by the outdated Mailman installation not handling DKIM correctly – the "[systemd-devel]" tag breaks DKIM signatures, and some domains opt into having their messages "quarantined" on DKIM failure, which Gmail honors. (Arch for example has decided to disable the [list] tag