Re: [systemd-devel] feature request: optional, with delay, for equivalent of setterm blank for VT login prompt

2023-04-30 Thread u34
Mantas Mikulėnas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 11:29 wrote: > > > The following is a feature request. At src/login/loginctl.c ? > > The looked up feature is the equivalent of > > setterm --blank aDelay --powerdown SomeOtherDelay > > , only as soon as the login prompt appears. Before login.

Re: [systemd-devel] Failed to start up manager. Freezing execution.

2023-04-30 Thread Caeri Tech
Thanks Adrian that seems to be it. I hacked my hook (Wow! What a phrase.) to create /tmp on the zram device and the boot completes. However, I now briefly see several "Failed to start MD array monitor" messages. So far that doesn't seem to affect anything. On Sun., Apr. 30, 2023, 11:37 a.m. Ad

Re: [systemd-devel] feature request: optional, with delay, for equivalent of setterm blank for VT login prompt

2023-04-30 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
On Sun, Apr 30, 2023, 11:29 wrote: > The following is a feature request. At src/login/loginctl.c ? > The looked up feature is the equivalent of > setterm --blank aDelay --powerdown SomeOtherDelay > , only as soon as the login prompt appears. Before login. > I mean, I ask to leave the current

[systemd-devel] feature request: optional, with delay, for equivalent of setterm blank for VT login prompt

2023-04-30 Thread u34
The following is a feature request. At src/login/loginctl.c ? The looked up feature is the equivalent of setterm --blank aDelay --powerdown SomeOtherDelay , only as soon as the login prompt appears. Before login. I mean, I ask to leave the current state as is. But allow the admin to set up the