Re: [systemd-devel] Systems-resolved: Calling gethostbyaddr on non-local/non-private causes connection attempt

2024-02-23 Thread anthony_ful...@trendmicro.com
I tried this on a fresh installation of Fedora Workstation 39. I installed wireshark and set the filter to `tcp.port == 5355` then ran the python script again with an ip of `123.123.123.123` and I see an outbound connection attempt to IP 123.123.123.123 on port 5355. Hope that helps, Anthony

Re: [systemd-devel] Systems-resolved: Calling gethostbyaddr on non-local/non-private causes connection attempt

2024-02-23 Thread anthony_ful...@trendmicro.com
Hi Cristian, Below is my complete /etc/nsswitch.conf file. Have you tried any other IP addresses by chance? I noticed that some IPs do not exhibit this behavior such as 1.1.1.1 and 8.8.8.8. I’m also willing to see if this behavior exists outside Debian, maybe it’s a default Debian

Re: [systemd-devel] Systems-resolved: Calling gethostbyaddr on non-local/non-private causes connection attempt

2024-02-23 Thread Cristian Rodríguez
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 8:13 PM anthony_ful...@trendmicro.com wrote: I tried again now with packet capture software and no such behaviour was found. ..what you have in the hosts line of nsswitch.conf ?

Re: [systemd-devel] Wireguard routes only after connect

2024-02-23 Thread Andrei Borzenkov
On 14.02.2024 11:55, Julian Zielke wrote: Hi, is there a possibility to only add the routes from allowed-ips to the kernel routing table after the peer has connected? This directly contradicts your next statement Because since the tunnel itself is stateless, there is no way for me to make

Re: [systemd-devel] Can I provide separate enabling for dbus-activation and "normal" start ?

2024-02-23 Thread Max Gautier
On Fri, Feb 23, 2024 at 10:19:12AM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Do, 22.02.24 17:09, Max Gautier (m...@max.gautier.name) wrote: > > > Is it possible when writing a dbus-activable service to provide two > > separate and independent ways to enable it ? > > > > The D-Bus service file would

Re: [systemd-devel] Can I provide separate enabling for dbus-activation and "normal" start ?

2024-02-23 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Do, 22.02.24 17:09, Max Gautier (m...@max.gautier.name) wrote: > Is it possible when writing a dbus-activable service to provide two > separate and independent ways to enable it ? > > The D-Bus service file would for instance be: > [D-BUS Service] > Name=org.freedesktop.Notifications >