Hi!
I wonder: Say service A.service is started via A.timer, and A.service cannot
run unless file B exists, so A.service uses AssertPathExists=B.
Will it make sense to repeat that requirement in A.timer? The idea was to
prevent the timer from starting if the service would not start (due to missin
Hi!
It does not answer your question, but I wonder who at the Microsoft world
started to suggest using “.local” as domain. See
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local for further details.
Ulrich
From: systemd-devel On Behalf Of
struth
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2024 1:04 AM
To: systemd-devel@lists
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Chapman
> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2024 9:14 AM
> To: Windl, Ulrich
> Cc: Andrei Borzenkov ; Mantas Mikulėnas
> ; systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [systemd-devel] Re: Re: "OnUnitInactiveSec Timer not
> firing" issue
>
> On
On Fri, Aug 2, 2024, 02:04 struth wrote:
> Hello systemd-devel group.
> I have just started using systemd-resolved to try and achieve a goal that
> I will try to explain.
> I know very little about it (web searches so far) so please excuse any
> silly questions or trains of thought.
> I have a De
Hello systemd-devel group.
I have just started using systemd-resolved to try and achieve a goal that I
will try to explain.
I know very little about it (web searches so far) so please excuse any
silly questions or trains of thought.
I have a Debian Bullseye client in a Microsoft network that uses a
Hello
I was wondering whether anybody has any experience of running the sshd
service successfully on a system with a 'non-bash' shell?
We're using systemd 250.5 and openssh 8.9p1. Both ssh and scp work as
expected with '/bin/sh -> bash.bash' on the target, but with '/bin/sh ->
busybox.nosuid' (as
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrei Borzenkov
> Sent: Thursday, August 1, 2024 12:49 PM
> To: Windl, Ulrich
> Cc: systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: [EXT] Re: Re: [systemd-devel] "OnUnitInactiveSec Timer not firing"
> issue
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:42 PM Windl, Ulrich
On Thu, Aug 1, 2024 at 1:42 PM Windl, Ulrich wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On " Try adding Persistent=yes, it should make it behave as you expect (you
> still need to start the unit manually at least once to initially trigger the
> timer).":
>
> You talk about the service unit, and not about the timer unit,
Hi!
On " Try adding Persistent=yes, it should make it behave as you expect (you
still need to start the unit manually at least once to initially trigger the
timer).":
You talk about the service unit, and not about the timer unit, right?
Systemd.timer says (about Persistent): " Note that this se
