On 2016-10-12 11:26, Chris Bell wrote:
On 2016-10-12 09:28, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.10.2016 um 15:08 schrieb Chris Bell:
Not sure if this is the right place to ask
no
Sorry
I'll unsub so this doesn't happen again. Sorry again for spamming
On 2016-10-12 09:28, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 12.10.2016 um 15:08 schrieb Chris Bell:
Not sure if this is the right place to ask
no
Sorry
box runs 231, but our EL7 (RHEL7.2) boxes are only at 219, where it
has
been (if I'm not mistaken) since the 7.0 release
not true, there where
Hey everyone,
Not sure if this is the right place to ask, but I figured someone here
or at RH would know. What's the TTL for systemd updates on EL7? My Arch
box runs 231, but our EL7 (RHEL7.2) boxes are only at 219, where it has
been (if I'm not mistaken) since the 7.0 release. Any idea on
On 2016-10-11 22:29, Samuel Williams wrote:
For step 2, what would be the best practice. Rsync the local container
to the remote container?
That's worked fine for me so far. Just to state the obvious: makes sure
the container is stopped before using rsync.
Hi all,
I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system? Basically, I'd
like to be able to see, relatively clearly, what targets are reached and
when, what services are wanted/required by the target, and some
dependencies between
On 2015-10-23 12:29, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 12:02:18PM -0400, Chris Bell wrote:
Hi all,
I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system? Basically, I'd
like to be able to see, relatively clearly, what targets
Hi all,
First off, I apologize for starting so many threads here. I'm working on
becoming intimately familiar with systemd and all its capabilities, and
have run into numerous questions and issues. This list has been
incredibly helpful, thank you all!!
Now, the issue. When I use
On 2015-10-23 12:23, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
23.10.2015 19:02, Chris Bell пишет:
Hi all,
I was wondering, is there any way to create a complete
dependency/ordering map for my entire systemd system?
For starting something "systemd --test" shows all static dependenc
Hi all,
Is there a way to set an affinity for an entire slice? Say, for example,
I have system-webhosted.slice, but I only want the services running
within system-webhosted.slice to run on cores 5-8. I can set this
individually per service (systemd.exec man page), but it does not
indicate
On 2015-10-19 17:24, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 19.10.15 17:16, Chris Bell (cwb...@narmos.org) wrote:
>However, I just had a long chat with Tejun Heo about this, and we came
>to the conclusion that's probably safe to expose a minimal subset of
>cpuset now, and reuse the
On 2015-10-19 14:15, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 19.10.15 17:37, Chris Bell (cwb...@narmos.org) wrote:
>I was mostly wondering about the env var issue you raised...
>
>>I also think it would be convenient in some cases to be able to use the
>>'Nice' and 'Private{N
On 2015-10-19 16:54, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 19.10.15 11:58, Chris Bell (cwb...@narmos.org) wrote:
Is there a way to set an affinity for an entire slice?
No there is not. But it's definitely our intention to add this, and
expose the "cpuset" cgroup controlle
On 2015-10-19 17:16, Chris Bell wrote:
Basically, I have a number of services that may or may not be running
at any given time, based on the whims of the users. All of these
services are hosted services of some type, and occasionally they have
been known to eat all CPU cores, lagging everything
On 2015-10-16 18:30, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
16.10.2015 17:41, Chris Bell пишет:
[Install]
WantedBy= # To clear out previous wantedby
params,
though this doesn't seem to work like that. Documentation doesn't say
it
should, so I'm not surprised.
Only selected
On 2015-10-16 13:55, Chris Bell wrote:
On 2015-10-14 15:58, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 05.10.15 12:30, Chris Bell (cwb...@narmos.org) wrote:
Hi all,
I have an Arch machine with systemd 226, running an Arch container,
also
with systemd 226. For whatever reason in 225, `machinectl
On 2015-10-14 15:58, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 05.10.15 12:30, Chris Bell (cwb...@narmos.org) wrote:
Hi all,
I have an Arch machine with systemd 226, running an Arch container,
also
with systemd 226. For whatever reason in 225, `machinectl login`
stopped
working correctly
Hello,
I currently have a systemd unit that I have to reference a lot which has
a rather long name. I would prefer to be able to reference this unit as
a short alias.
Example: I have a container unit called 'systemd-nspawn@gitlab.service'
and I would like to be able to refer to it as simply
Hello,
I have configured polkit to allow my user to manage basically everything
in systemd without requiring sudo or root. Enabling, disabling,
reloading, etc all work as expected. However, 'systemctl edit' does not.
It does not deny permission for me to use the function, but it fails
when
On 2015-10-16 15:41, Mantas Mikulėnas wrote:
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 5:44 PM, Chris Bell <cwb...@narmos.org> wrote:
Is there a way for polkit to correct or temporarily override these
permissions? Or should I use ACLs to grant write permission to my
user for those directories?
The p
On 2015-10-12 12:35, arnaud gaboury wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:30 PM, Chris Bell <cwb...@narmos.org> wrote:
Hi all,
I have an Arch machine with systemd 226,
which arch version exactly? I had the same issue with 226. It is gone
with 226-3.
setup: Arch host running Fedora container.
On 2015-10-05 12:30, Chris Bell wrote:
I have an Arch machine with systemd 226, running an Arch container,
also with systemd 226. For whatever reason in 225, `machinectl login`
stopped working correctly, and in 226 `machinectl login` does not work
properly. It attaches to the machine, but does
Hi all,
I have an Arch machine with systemd 226, running an Arch container, also
with systemd 226. For whatever reason in 225, `machinectl login` stopped
working correctly, and in 226 `machinectl login` does not work properly.
It attaches to the machine, but does not seem to redirect stdin
On 2015-09-01 14:23, Kay Sievers wrote:
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Tomasz Torcz
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 05:47:57PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On 01/09/15 17:21, Goffredo Baroncelli wrote:
AIUI, /boot/efi also makes it a bit easier to have the ESP remain
On 2015-08-26 20:28, Florian Koch wrote:
Ohne way is to use an More recent Kernel, with 3.16+ the Kernel
defaults for These values where changed to unlimeted
This worked. I booted the host with a 4.1 kernel, and the values were
appropriately high. Thanks!
On 2015-08-27 18:18, Lennart
Hello all,
I'm attempting to run GitLab (with postgresql) on a CentOS 7 container
with systemd-nspawn. Postgre keeps failing, because it tries to allocate
more shared memory than the container seems to allow. I cannot use
sysctl to write the kernel.shmmax and kernel.shmall properties, since
On 2015-08-12 20:19, Harry Goldschmitt wrote:
I just modified my grub kernel command line to add the consoleblank=0
parameter. That isn't the problem. First consoleblank is the kernel
screensaver and according to the documentation it kicks in after 15
minutes by default.
What I see is a few
On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Daniel Mack dan...@zonque.org wrote:
Could you please send a patch that does that change?
Here you go!
From 517599692ed194156e8277e310270f4407d0d124 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Bell cwb...@mail.usf.edu
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 05:22:36 -0400
Subject
a better place to
have this discussion, please let me know.
Chris Bell
Ph.D. Student
University of South Florida
College of Engineering
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
NarMOS Research Team
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Chris Bell cwb...@mail.usf.edu wrote:
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014
or
+ removed when the user has logged
+ out of all active sessions. If a user
It's a bit more verbose, but I think it's more precise, and it
completely sidesteps the 'singular they' debate (which I'll refrain
from weighing in on).
Chris Bell
Ph.D. Student
University
not even sure this is actually a 'bug'. For all I know, it's
actually, legitimately, waiting for something. The problem is, I have
no idea - and don't know how to find out - what it thinks it's waiting
for. Any assistance to that end would also be greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Chris Bell
Ph.D. Student
30 matches
Mail list logo