On Fri, 19 Sep 2014 11:24:14 +0200
Emil Renner Berthing wrote:
> On 19 September 2014 08:42, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > 2014-09-19 0:34 GMT+02:00 David Herrmann :
> >>> -Wl,-fuse-ld=gold])
> >
> > The reason to use gold was that the compat libraries require the
> > ifunc functionality.
>
On Thu, 28 Aug 2014 09:53:27 +0200
Michael Olbrich wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 09:42:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 26.08.14 15:15, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de)
> > wrote:
> > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 03:48:09PM +0200, Lennart Poettering
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 17:40:40 +0200
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2014 at 05:00:11PM +0200, har...@redhat.com wrote:
> > From: Harald Hoyer
> >
> > According to Brent Baude , who provided the patch,
> > IBM doesn't want to support the PPC 32 bit LE architecture at all.
> Th
On Fri, 18 Jul 2014 13:42:21 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Blume wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jul 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> >>
> >> PR/SM is the hypervisor, so it should be detected as *not*
> >> virtualized, which mean that it does not get any _id string. For
> >> the virtualized systems on top, yes, it'
On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:27:56 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 11.07.14 15:04, Michael Olbrich (m.olbr...@pengutronix.de)
> wrote:
>
> > gcc does not define WORDS_BIGENDIAN for big-endian PowerPC. It
> > defines __BIG_ENDIAN__ instead. So also check for __BIG_ENDIAN__ to
> > determine if
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 12:22:19 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Blume wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:07:18 +0200 (CEST)
> > Thomas Blume wrote:
> >
> >> systemd was lacking the code to detect virtualization on s390x.
> >>
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 15:07:18 +0200 (CEST)
Thomas Blume wrote:
> systemd was lacking the code to detect virtualization on s390x.
> The patch adds detection for the primary virtualization layer (PR/SM)
> as well as for secondary layers (z/VM and KVM).
> ---
> src/shared/virt.c | 24 +++
On Thu, 3 Jul 2014 13:09:02 +0200
Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 03.07.14 09:54, Umut Tezduyar Lindskog
> (umut.tezdu...@axis.com) wrote:
>
> > ---
> > src/shared/architecture.c |1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/shared/architecture.c b/src/shared/archit
On Fri, 31 Jan 2014 15:24:30 +0100
Dan Horák wrote:
> The /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules file does not tag the
> "sclp_line*" terminal device and, hence, systemd will not handle it.
> The result is no agetty run for the LPAR console meaning no local
> access to the
The /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/99-systemd.rules file does not tag the "sclp_line*"
terminal device and, hence, systemd will not handle it. The result is no agetty
run for the LPAR console meaning no local access to the system.
see also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860158
---
rules/99-sy
On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:10:00 -0400
Colin Walters wrote:
> What's the implementation status of
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/BootLoaderSpec/ ?
>
> For example, do any patches exist for grub or syslinux to read
> from /boot/loader (either at runtime or to generate a
> bootloader
Hi,
during the builds for Fedora/s390x I've found that systemd v38 fails to
build on big-endian platforms.
...
make[2]: Entering directory `/root/systemd'
CC src/journal/libsystemd_journal_la-sd-journal.lo
src/journal/sd-journal.c: In function 'init_location':
src/journal/sd-journal.c:69:22
12 matches
Mail list logo
