On 02/22/2011 11:33 AM, Cristian Patrascu wrote:
> 2. If there is such an option, is there a way to read the specified cpu
> limit from the control group hierarchy?
If you put a cpu.share value in the cpu cgroup, all processes in that
group have a weight of that value. read the cgroup docs how th
On 02/14/2011 06:20 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Well, my famous shell fragment already kinda did that. As well as the
> autogrouping patch that got merged.
The autogrouping is broken in my opinion. The session id is not
distributed well enough for good grouping. When I click on a browser
ico
On 02/14/2011 05:04 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I am not sure I actually buy that. I kinda like the fact that sending a
> signal to the gnome-shell process group delivers a signal to all
> processes it spawned.
But every program that execs another process may call setgrp on it's
child. Most s
On 02/14/2011 11:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> I am not sure what you mean by "do not set the setpgid"? Do you want
> gnome-session to become its own session or the desktop services
> themselves?
gnome-panel for example should do a setpgid on the programs it starts as
they are logical new pr
On 02/14/2011 10:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> I stumbled on this one too, but got it fixed by giving the most cgroups
>> a rt_sched_slice of 1. this way they can be set to rt and then, move the
>> process to a group with more rt slice if there is a rule to move it
>> there.
>
> I am not s
On 02/13/2011 10:36 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Note that pam_systemd in git now explicitly resets the "cpu" cgroup of
> all sessions to the root group since otherwise RT scheduling will not be
> available for any user daemons. This is a general limitation of the
> "cpu" scheduler right now,
Hi,
I just released ulatencyd[1] 0.4.5 which now works nicely under systemd
under two conditions:
* DefaultControllers should be unset
* pam_systemd should also get an empty controllers=.
systemd seems currently not to have a dbus interface which allows to
change the DefaultControllers, so I sug
e can design it together as a standard.
I hope xdg mailinglist is the best place for this discussion, as we are
defining a standard.
[1] https://github.com/poelzi/ulatencyd
kind regards
Daniel Poelzleithner
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
