Re: [systemd-devel] [dm-devel] RFC: one more time: SCSI device identification

2021-04-30 Thread Ewan D. Milne
On Wed, 2021-04-28 at 10:09 +1000, Erwin van Londen wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:41 -0400, Ewan D. Milne wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 20:33 +, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:14 -0400, Ewan D. Milne wrote: > > > > There's no

Re: [systemd-devel] RFC: one more time: SCSI device identification

2021-04-27 Thread Ewan D. Milne
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 20:33 +, Martin Wilck wrote: > On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 16:14 -0400, Ewan D. Milne wrote: > > > > There's no way to do that, in principle. Because there could be > > other I/Os in flight. You might (somehow) avoid retrying an I/O > > that g

Re: [systemd-devel] RFC: one more time: SCSI device identification

2021-04-27 Thread Ewan D. Milne
On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:16 +, Martin Wilck wrote: > On Mon, 2021-04-26 at 13:14 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > While we're at it, I'd like to mention another issue: WWID > > > changes. > > > > > > This is a big problem for multipathd. The gist is that the device > > > identi

Re: [systemd-devel] Antw: [EXT] Re: [dm-devel] RFC: one more time: SCSI device identification

2021-04-27 Thread Ewan D. Milne
On Tue, 2021-04-27 at 12:52 +0200, Ulrich Windl wrote: > > > > Hannes Reinecke schrieb am 27.04.2021 um 10:21 > > > > in Nachricht > > <2a6903e4-ff2b-67d5-e772-6971db844...@suse.de>: > > On 4/27/21 10:10 AM, Martin Wilck wrote: > > > On Tue, 2021‑04‑27 at 13:48 +1000, Erwin van Londen wrote: > >