Re: [systemd-devel] [FIX] SANE udev rules processing performance

W dniu 07.12.2020 o 11:25, Lennart Poettering pisze: On So, 06.12.20 11:13, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote: The concern is: "Recalling #341 (closed), I do have some concerns about efficiency now that those 650+ USB rules get processed for every non-removal event rather than onl

[systemd-devel] [FIX] SANE udev rules processing performance

ry for the stupid request, but I'm just a SANE user who tries to fix his (and everyone's else) scanners. I don't have much knowledge about udev rules processing performance. -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

[systemd-devel] SANE udev rules processing performance

x27;m just a SANE user who tries to fix his (and everyone's else) scanners. I don't have much knowledge about udev rules processing performance. || -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

[systemd-devel] DisplayPort display non-persistent device naming

or"     Identifier  "DP-2"     Option  "Primary" "true" EndSection Is this a bug or a feature? -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] Which udev action is run on boot for my device?

ourse) And now SANE leader is asking me if this is backwards compatible with older kernels and systemd versions. I assumed this change would work on anything but maybe you could confirm? -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ ___ systemd-devel mailin

Re: [systemd-devel] Which udev action is run on boot for my device?

W dniu 26.10.2020 o 11:19, Lennart Poettering pisze: On So, 25.10.20 18:56, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote: W dniu 25.10.2020 o 18:36, Marcin Kocur pisze: Hello, as the topic states, I want to know which action(s) from "add", "remove", "change", &quo

Re: [systemd-devel] Which udev action is run on boot for my device?

W dniu 25.10.2020 o 18:36, Marcin Kocur pisze: Hello, as the topic states, I want to know which action(s) from "add", "remove", "change", "move", "online", "offline", "bind", and "unbind" were triggered on my devi

[systemd-devel] Which udev action is run on boot for my device?

er the rule. But if I trigger it with "add", the variable is there and also uaccess rule gets executed. So the ultimate quesiton is: what kind of trigger was executed on my device on boot time? -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] [udev] Scanner rule not applied during boot

W dniu 21.10.2020 o 08:52, Lennart Poettering pisze: On Di, 20.10.20 23:16, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote: Lennart, I'm using outdated lxdm with Xfce. I just disabled lxmd, copied fresh /etc/X11/xinit/xinitrc to ~/.xinitrc (adding my environment exec command there) and start

Re: [systemd-devel] [udev] Scanner rule not applied during boot

W dniu 20.10.2020 o 20:05, Lennart Poettering pisze: On Di, 20.10.20 18:47, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote: I don't how how this uaccess tag works, but I can assume that my scanner which is libsane_matched (as set by /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/49-sane.rules) gets ACL permission

Re: [systemd-devel] [udev] Scanner rule not applied during boot

W dniu 20.10.2020 o 13:44, Lennart Poettering pisze: On Mo, 19.10.20 21:19, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello systemd devs and users, I need an advice regarding USB scanner which rule is not(?) processed at boot time. When I trigger it manually, the scanner device file gets

[systemd-devel] [udev] Scanner rule not applied during boot

rboard: Gibabyte B550M AORUS PRO (rev. 1.0) Scanner: Mustek BearPaw 1200 TA CPU: AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G with Radeon Graphics Many thanks for every tip I get to resolve this problem! -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ <> ___ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel

Re: [systemd-devel] How to spin down a disc with systemd?

W dniu 30.04.2014 13:02, Lennart Poettering pisze: On Wed, 30.04.14 01:02, Marcin Kocur (marcin2...@gmail.com) wrote: Hello all, I wrote a service /etc/systemd/system/disable-2nd-hdd.service. I have 2 HDD's where one of them doesn't need to work all the time. So I thought it'd

Re: [systemd-devel] Disable timers

W dniu 30.04.2014 01:39, David Timothy Strauss pisze: systemctl disable or systemctl mask. You also have to stop it first, as that only changes the default. systemctl mask, disable doesn't seems to work. Thanks! -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ Dane kontaktowe / Contact details:

[systemd-devel] Disable timers

really a basic thing and I just can't find the info. This is not only mine impression. Please have a look here: http://jason.the-graham.com/2013/03/06/how-to-use-systemd-timers/ -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ Dane kontaktowe / Contact details: http://koci.net.pl/

[systemd-devel] How to spin down a disc with systemd?

hen I manually start this service after system has already booted, it works as expected. Kindly asking for some help. -- Pozdrawiam / Greetings Marcin Kocur █ Dane kontaktowe / Contact details: http://koci.net.pl/email ___ systemd-devel m