On 23/10/14 12:01, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 23.10.14 11:40, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
I don't really understand why it was developed as a half complete solution
if I am honest. It's not as if there are no examples to follow out there
(FSEvents) and it'
On 23/10/14 10:34, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 23.10.14 08:15, Aleksander Morgado (aleksan...@aleksander.es) wrote:
That's a good one indeed; coalescing events in that way in the kernel
looks quite a sane approach. Still, one single process in userspace
doing all the control of what chang
On 21/10/14 12:21, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 21.10.14 12:03, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
What precisely are you setting with sched_setscheulder() and ioprio_set()?
https://git.gnome.org/browse/tracker/tree/src/libtracker-common/tracker-sched.c#n29
and
https
On 21/10/14 11:06, Lennart Poettering wrote:
What functionality of cgroups were you precisely using?
This was not set up by the Tracker team but another Team at Nokia. Also,
perhaps Philip or Ivan have some comments and remember better.
It's a while back now, but from what I remember on the
On 20/10/14 21:12, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 14.10.14 15:35, Martyn Russell (mar...@lanedo.com) wrote:
Hej Lennart,
I am not entirely sure what cgroups would really give you that
sched_setscheduler(), ioprio_set(), setrlimit() wouldn't give you
It's another approach,
On 15/10/14 16:01, David Timothy Strauss wrote:
I'm responding here only to the systemd list.
Thanks David, I appreciate your comments.
On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 4:35 PM, Martyn Russell wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions or projects that lead by example that
Tracker could/should f
Hello all,
Recently I've started looking into support for cgroups due to this bug:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737663
It was suggested I ask you guys to see what the best way forward would
be here. It seems there are different opinions about how to do this
including:
a) allow t
