Hello,
Using fedora39, it officially doesn't support uki images... i have
custom boot configuration.
Set layout=uki in install.conf and uki_generator to ukify, and other uki
related options.
Everything seems to work except that, even though linux kernel is picked
up when creating uki, init
Hello,
That seems to work, thank you.
W dniu 17.01.2023 o 13:05, Michał Zegan pisze:
It is a fedora system with a custom build kernel. As for why, probably
the only answer is that it is because i am weird, it is a laptop also
used as my personal playground.
When it goes to initrd, it might
dniu 17.01.2023 o 12:33, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Mo, 16.01.23 21:30, Michał Zegan (webc...@outlook.com) wrote:
At quick glance i cannot find anything about it. what about kernel
configuration? efivarfs is compiled as a module. is there any possible thing
that might happen here?
Ah, so this is
At quick glance i cannot find anything about it. what about kernel
configuration? efivarfs is compiled as a module. is there any possible
thing that might happen here?
W dniu 16.01.2023 o 18:52, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Mo, 16.01.23 18:30, Michał Zegan (webc...@outlook.com) wrote:
Hello
Hello,
What should be responsible for mounting efivarfs?
Using systemd-251 on fedora37, and my machine is booted in uefi mode
also with secureboot, but /sys/firmware/efi/efivars is not mounted on
boot, why?
I cannot find any unit file related to efivarfs mounting, and honestly
even adding a
W dniu 14.06.2022 o 10:19, Ulrich Windl pisze:
Michal Zegan schrieb am 14.06.2022 um 09:25 in Nachricht
...
Sure when "init" was just a bundle of scripts, you could run one of the
scripts it runs and hope for the best. You can generally still do that,
but just don't expect asking a non-runn
W dniu 14.06.2022 o 07:57, Ulrich Windl pisze:
Colin Guthrie schrieb am 13.06.2022 um 16:34 in
Nachricht :
Ulrich Windl wrote on 13/06/2022 14:42:
Colin Guthrie schrieb am 13.06.2022 um 14:58 in
Nachricht :
Ulrich Windl wrote on 13/06/2022 09:09:
Hi!
Two questions:
1) Why can't I use "
W dniu 13.06.2022 o 16:34, Colin Guthrie pisze:
Ulrich Windl wrote on 13/06/2022 14:42:
Colin Guthrie schrieb am 13.06.2022 um
14:58 in
Nachricht :
Ulrich Windl wrote on 13/06/2022 09:09:
Hi!
Two questions:
1) Why can't I use "systemctl start network" in a chroot
environment (e.g.
mounti
W dniu 6.06.2022 o 18:29, Michal Koutný pisze:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 05:59:32PM +0200, Michał Zegan
wrote:
I assume if it would be on it would break any and all realtime
usage...?
Most likely (you'd not be able either: turn on RT policy, migrate the
process or enable CPU controller
W dniu 6.06.2022 o 17:14, Michal Koutný pisze:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2022 at 04:54:03PM +0200, Michał Zegan
wrote:
this note pointed to in the readme is quite cgroups v1 specific, I believe
what it describes was true in v1, and v2 does not have any capability to
control realtime processes in non
W dniu 6.06.2022 o 16:02, Michal Koutný pisze:
Hello Michał.
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 03:28:23PM +0200, Michał Zegan
wrote:
I have kernel 5.17 on archlinux.
How is your kernel configured wrt CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED?
it is unset
Is that still true?
That depends :-)
Yet, checking /proc
Hello,
This is more of a kernel than systemd question but I am not subscribed
to any kernel ml and I assume systemd people should know the answer.
I have kernel 5.17 on archlinux. The cgroupsv2 documentation states that
cgroup cpu controller currently does not support realtime processes, so
Thanks for the insight.
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 17:34, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Mo, 01.03.21 17:17, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>>> But this stuff is racy of course if the RTC is compiled as module and
>>> you care for generic hw, that might or m
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 17:19, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Mo, 01.03.21 17:09, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>>>> There are problems with log timestamps when you do that, and it is
>>>> probably why it was not done.
>>>> I am wonder
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 16:59, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Mo, 01.03.21 14:52, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Someone should really find a way to make it cooperate well with modular
>> rtcs.
>> It's popping up over and over and over and
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 17:01, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Mo, 01.03.21 15:38, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> There are problems with log timestamps when you do that, and it is
>> probably why it was not done.
>> I am wondering if the only corre
8, Kevin P. Fleming pisze:
> It's fairly simple to add a one-shot service unit to use 'hwclock' to
> read from the RTC and set the kernel's real-time clock. I do this on
> my RPis which use modules for their RTCs.
>
> On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 9:02 AM Michał Zegan
Someone should really find a way to make it cooperate well with modular
rtcs.
It's popping up over and over and over and over again and no one is/will
build all rtc drivers into the kernel.
W dniu 01.03.2021 o 13:04, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
> Normally I think systemd expects the kernel to do this
For me it is pretty logical, as in: the service started in relation to
socket unit gets the respective socket.
If service is already started there is no way to pass additional socket
to it without restarting it.
It may even listen exactly on the socket specified, just creating it on
it's own.
W dn
As a workaround I am almost sure you can instruct dracut to include the
file, can't you?
W dniu 16.10.2020 o 17:45, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fr, 16.10.20 16:26, Daniel J. R. May (daniel@danieljrmay.com) wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 2020-10-16 at 15:16 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> So the
Note there is an easy way to override term type.
The default serial-getty@.service at least here has no TERM set by
default, but uses it to set term type when launching getty.
You can use kernel command line and add TERM=screen for example, or
things like that, and it should be picked up, shouldn't
The thing that loads kernel and initramfs must itself be able to read
the fs, and systemd-boot delegates to uefi for that.
So things should be in ESP or you should use grub2 on uefi too and have
the grub image itself on ESP only.
Not sure about the current required partition structure I.E. where ES
e to solve this problem.
>
>
> thanks,
> Byron
>
>
>
>
> At 2020-04-17 19:44:48, "Michał Zegan" wrote:
>>I am not quite sure what you mean, but... generally these are symlinks
>>in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/ so you could dele
^ often stands for ctrl, so this is ctrl+]
W dniu 20.04.2020 o 17:30, Damian Ivanov pisze:
> Hello!
>
> Please enlighten me: which key is ^]
>
> Br,
> Damian
> ___
> systemd-devel mailing list
> systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freed
I am not quite sure what you mean, but... generally these are symlinks
in /etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/ so you could delete them
manually if your intention is to make the actual os image with this
disabled from the start...
W dniu 17.04.2020 o 12:10, www pisze:
>
> I mean that this
W dniu 09.04.2020 o 10:23, Pekka Paalanen pisze:
> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 09:46:08 +0200
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
>> On Fr, 03.04.20 10:28, Pekka Paalanen (ppaala...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
My (maybe bad) guess is that it would need to be addressed in the kernel
though
And the Can
W dniu 08.04.2020 o 00:44, juice pisze:
> Dorian ROSSE kirjoitti 2020-04-08 01:37:
>> Sorry I was say an error
>>
>> I can't start them they happen crash
>>
>
> Normally the getty@ttyX.services are off and are automatically started
> when you start a session on a VT.
tty1 is usually explicitly
W dniu 08.04.2020 o 00:03, Dorian ROSSE pisze:
> I explain again the problem juice
>
> I can't use my monitor foe edit script
>
> Because console-getty et getty@tty1 service are disabled,
>
> I can start but I want both service become static,
>
> How to become both service as static ?
Oh,
1. I am probably not a right person to say this, but please calm down,
because that way of discussing does not make sense.
2. The problem is that we literally do not understand what you are
saying. You ask for help about problems but at least I cannot (not at
all) decipher what is the question.
W
Hi,
Curious what is the use case. For me emergency is used mostly when I run
the kernel with the emergency cmdline parameter or when something fails
and I have to debug it before everything else starts.
W dniu 07.04.2020 o 10:26, Matwey V. Kornilov pisze:
> Hi,
>
> I would like my system to reboo
I have used the embedded term unfortunately, but it seems to affect at
least some devices like raspberry pi, odroid c2, like sbc's.
W dniu 31.03.2020 o 17:57, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Di, 31.03.20 17:39, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Seems like rtc
Seems like rtc drivers as module is quite often a thing for embedded.
But not sure where this should be solved, maybe at initramfs? If one is
unwilling to build all rtc drivers into the kernel (the case of generic
kernels where you would have to build all of them in)...
W dniu 31.03.2020 o 16:29,
W dniu 11.12.2019 o 08:17, Ulrich Windl pisze:
Michal Zegan schrieb am 10.12.2019 um 17:53 in
> Nachricht :
>
> [...]
>> Well. This specifically may be doable by checking if any file open by
>> process is marked deleted, but would not work if the file was just
>> rewritten...
>
> Did you
W dniu 10.12.2019 o 15:12, Ulrich Windl pisze:
Lennart Poettering schrieb am 10.12.2019 um 12:32
> in
> Nachricht <20191210113234.GA16721@gardel-login>:
>> On Di, 10.12.19 10:38, Ulrich Windl (ulrich.wi...@rz.uni‑regensburg.de)
> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Two questions (In Linux it's possib
Note that if systemd is running in the initramfs too, then journal logs
from the current boot will contain initramfs logs too.
W dniu 22.11.2019 o 16:25, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 5:18 PM Boyce, Kevin P [US] (AS)
> mailto:kevin.bo...@ngc.com>> wrote:
>
> Good Morning l
Hello,
My use case is the following: make a test of routing protocols without
having... enough real hardware. I decided to do that via containers
using systemd-nspawn, and because I may need many interconnected
networks and things like qos settings applied without dirty scripts, I
decided to try op
W dniu 16.10.2019 o 16:26, Brian Reichert pisze:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 07:43:10AM +, Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 04:08:24PM -0400, Brian Reichert wrote:
>>> I initiated an unsubscribe from this web page:
>>>
>>> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/op
only audit messages but show the rest?
W dniu 25.11.2018 o 13:53, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sa, 24.11.18 14:38, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> Does journald intent to replace auditd?
>
> Well, no.
>
> I mean, there's some us
Hello,
Does journald intent to replace auditd? Because it has ability to get
audit messages and uses it by default, also turning on audit.
On the other hand, it does not silence dmesg audit messages like auditd
seems to do, why?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__
I am not really sure if you are right and you can concatenate cpio
archives, just be ware! they may be compressed, and in this case you
would rather cat their uncompressed form... I think so at least.
W dniu 05.10.2018 o 09:10, David Anderson pisze:
> And of course, the law of asking questions on
Hello.
When systemctl is-active was added?
I need this to check if I can safely use it to check if unit is active
if I don't have prior knowledge about the systemd version I am running
this on, this is for an ansible playbook.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hmm, why not to place such things in /etc/fstab?
W dniu 14.06.2017 o 09:30, Pascal K pisze:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am new to this list and to udev (used mdev before).
>
> My goal: Mount a CFast card partioned with 2 partitions one FAT32 and
> one EXT4, the EXT4 I would like to mount with opti
Hello.
My laptop does spuriously wake up from suspend.
Can systemd be involved in this? I do not know any timer set to use a
wake alarm, but I may be wrong. I usually suspend by closing a lid, and
logind reports lid opened after wake up, but I do not know if it is just
because lid was clos
W dniu 29.05.2017 o 11:37, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sat, 27.05.17 20:51, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I came across the following:
>> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
>> call
W dniu 28.05.2017 o 20:43, Mike Gilbert pisze:
> On Sat, May 27, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Michał Zegan
> wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I came across the following:
>> The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
>> call that normally would trigg
Hello.
I came across the following:
The manpage reboot(2) says, that inside of a pid namespace, a reboot
call that normally would trigger restart actually triggers sending
sighup to the init of a namespace, and sigint is sent in case of
halt/poweroff.
I have verified that reboot actually triggers
I have probably discovered the cause, and it is, that the memory image
would be too large to fit in the swap space, and I would have to
increase the swap space.
W dniu 25.04.2017 o 05:34, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
> 25.04.2017 04:45, Michał Zegan пишет:
>> Hello.
>>
>> I have a
Hello.
I have archlinux with systemd (currently the newest released).
Hibernation works properly in this computer. however, after few
hibernations (or maybe something else triggers this condition?) it
suddenly stops working. trying to do systemctl hibernate in the terminal
says something like unkn
W dniu 09.02.2017 o 18:49, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Thu, 09.02.17 16:14, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Btw, about the argument that the kernel should set rtc time because of
>> wrong timestamps in logs, so I should compile the rtc into the kernel
W dniu 09.02.2017 o 15:52, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Tue, 17.01.17 12:29, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I am aware of the fact that systemd relies on the kernel to set system
>> clock from hardware clock, and that requi
Hello.
I am aware of the fact that systemd relies on the kernel to set system
clock from hardware clock, and that requires compiling rtc drivers into
the kernel, not as modules.
I am also aware that doing it othervise would mix timestamps in log entries.
The question is: if I have rtc driver as a
But he coul use a .link file to give a persistent interface name based
on some property, wouldn't it be a nice thing to do?
W dniu 16.11.2016 o 17:11, Greg KH pisze:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 03:33:42PM +0200, Pekka Sarnila wrote:
>> On 'Predictable Network Interface Names' it states as a benefit
:
> On Fri, 11.11.16 19:36, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Why do you turn off keyrings? at least manpages say that userns
>> virtualizes keyrings or something similar...
>
> That'd be a new feature then...
>
> Lennart
>
sign
Why do you turn off keyrings? at least manpages say that userns
virtualizes keyrings or something similar...
W dniu 11.11.2016 o 19:24, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 11.11.16 19:21, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> audit/autofs are not properly virtualized,
audit/autofs are not properly virtualized, I know. But I thought
keyrings and cgroups are.
W dniu 11.11.2016 o 18:28, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 11.11.16 16:41, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Thank you for your answers!
>>
>> What I meant
t, and you probably do not intent it to be done by
overriding container's scope unit settings, for example?
W dniu 11.11.2016 o 13:52, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Wed, 09.11.16 18:24, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> Does sy
Hello.
Does systemd-nspawn intent to be a full secure container technology? or
it maybe already is? what is missing?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.
Hello, when you use machinectl shell, you get your own pseudoterminal,
don't you? but it is owned by root.
Problem is when some background process tries to open this terminal when
this background process runs from the spawned shell, like gpg-agent,
because it has no permissions to do so and fails.
But how to check what is happening? and I am still not sure why my
normal laptop with systemd works properly and starts journald.
W dniu 14.08.2016 o 06:56, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
> 14.08.2016 04:58, Michał Zegan пишет:
>> Hello. I have installed systemd version 231 from arch repos. ac
Hello. I have installed systemd version 231 from arch repos. actually it
is systemd-selinux from aur. now, the problem:
the system boots. but some services fail to start, notably
systemd-journald and systemd-networkd, not sure if others fail too.
When checking what happened using dmesg as journald
Hello.
There is, it seems, a problem with the hardware clock. That is, the
systemd does not care about it. Neither systemd nor udev rules set the
system time using the hardware clock.
From what I know, if the clock is a cmos rtc, the kernel always sets
time during bootup. In any other case, it sho
well, did not know about that! it actually seems to work, thank you very
much.
W dniu 12.07.2016 o 12:57, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Tue, 12.07.16 12:47, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> uhm the real question was: If I am already in the wheel group, how can
journal.
W dniu 12.07.2016 o 11:36, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sat, 09.07.16 22:45, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I believe administrators, like groups wheel and adm at least, have
>> access to read system journal and journa
Hello.
I believe administrators, like groups wheel and adm at least, have
access to read system journal and journals of all users.
journalctl can show the journal of the current user, system journal or
merge both of them. Could you please add the possibility to see the logs
of others, if not alrea
I say for new timer units, but you would need extra logic
to handle changing and reloading those timer units, or removing them
maybe, so hmm well, may be more complicated than I thought.
W dniu 08.07.2016 o 21:04, Andrei Borzenkov pisze:
> 08.07.2016 21:40, Michał Zegan пишет:
>> Well, I
service units this way.
W dniu 08.07.2016 o 20:29, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 08.07.16 18:17, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> well, that makes sense, thanks. about a timer section shortcut, could it
>> be done in a different way? like, it is a sh
08.07.2016 o 18:06, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Fri, 08.07.16 15:42, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
>
>> One thing to say: I heard, at least once, that systemd's timer are more
>> complicated because in order to make a timer you need two files ins
One thing to say: I heard, at least once, that systemd's timer are more
complicated because in order to make a timer you need two files instead
of creating one, especially in comparison to cron where you need just
one line although I always forget the order of fields. I would say a
timer section in
Hello.
There is a problem with current audit support in journald. it listens
for audit events, but those same audit events go to dmesg, making a lot
of garbage.
Also, in case of a selinux enabled system, it generates huge amount of
audit output even if you do not want that, for example, pam genera
27.05.2016 o 18:37, Tom Gundersen pisze:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Michał Zegan
> mailto:webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl>> wrote:
>
> Hello, I have encountered a very interesting problem: I have a wired
> ipv4 network configured via systemd-network, and an ipv6
Hello, I have encountered a very interesting problem: I have a wired
ipv4 network configured via systemd-network, and an ipv6 sit tunnel.
The problem is it does not start. trying to restart systemd-networkd
gives the error like both local and remote addresses of the tunnel are
incompatible. I assum
From what I understand, directories such as /usr/lib and stuff are
properly used even in case of a corrupted ld.so cache. like ldconfig
does not affect those directories at this time.
W dniu 20.05.2016 o 14:06, Vasiliy Tolstov pisze:
> 2016-05-20 15:01 GMT+03:00 Florian Weimer :
>> The default sys
symlink it in /etc/udev/rules.d to /dev/null.
W dniu 28.02.2016 o 11:40, Łukasz Stelmach pisze:
> Hi,
>
> One of the default rules supplied by systemd (v215 in Debian) is
> responsible restoring the state of rfkill switches.
>
> SUBSYSTEM=="rfkill", TAG+="systemd",
> ENV{SYSTEMD_WANTS}+="sy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi, I'll add to this:
W dniu 17.02.2016 o 14:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek pisze:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:35:55PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> We are using systemd to supervise our NoSQL database and are
>> generally happy.
>>
>> A few thing
The only thing seems to be you cannot go low latency with system mode
pulseaudio
W dniu 10.01.2016 o 18:53, Reindl Harald pisze:
Am 10.01.2016 um 18:42 schrieb Tom Yan:
Ugh I am not talking about system units, but user units...
P.S. Although not really relevant here, but I am using the (use
Hello.
I encountered a really strange behaviour, and I am not sure if this is
kernel, systemd or arch specific. Could you please try to explain to me
what happens there? Here it is:
I log into gnome desktop using the x server, x erver is running on tty2,
everything works. I run a terminal emul
It seems that it works, and also seems that it does not require udev
itself to be running with support for this although i am not sure. just
that the way of making such a test is not obvious, unfortunately.
W dniu 19.10.2015 o 16:49, Colin Guthrie pisze:
Michał Zegan wrote on 17/10/15 20:32
Hello.
On non systemd systems, or on systems with disabled ifnames, is it
possible to somehow check what would be the interface name after rename
by default?
I would need this for example in case when I installed a system into a
chroot environment, while the host is for example not a systemd sy
W dniu 16.09.2015 o 15:08, Martin Pitt pisze:
Michał Zegan [2015-09-16 14:41 +0200]:
I actually believe that debian does some splitting, for example pam-systemd
module is in a separate package. Actually I feel that particular case is
wrong, but it happens there. I mean debian jessie, of
I actually believe that debian does some splitting, for example
pam-systemd module is in a separate package. Actually I feel that
particular case is wrong, but it happens there. I mean debian jessie, of
course.
W dniu 16.09.2015 o 12:30, Colin Guthrie pisze:
I wouldn't normally grace such ran
Okay, You seem to be right. Didn't notice that.
W dniu 12.09.2015 o 05:31, Michael Chapman pisze:
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015, Michał Zegan wrote:
Hello.
It seems that I am able to change a hostname with hostnamectl
set-hostname name without any problems, even logged in as
unprivileged user,
Hello.
It seems that I am able to change a hostname with hostnamectl
set-hostname name without any problems, even logged in as unprivileged
user, and I did not get any authentication requests.
I did not modify polkit rules to allow this, not sure about the default
ones, but they probably shoul
Hello.
Before you stated that containers are not a security feature right now.
It is required to manually shift uids/gids on images etc.
What are other known problems with containers that use ALL namespaces?
Like if not counting the problem of uid allocation and manual shifting
of them.
_
Hello.
Is systemd-nspawn intended to eventually become usable for full system
containers/general use with enough security to run things like vps
hosting? How much is missing to be able to do that, or maybe it already
can? Like you have user namespaces support that probably adds more
security
9.15 17:05, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl) wrote:
Well, actually I believe you could mess with unit configuration overrides,
couldn't you?
I was experimenting once by giving the user test 1% of cpu using cgroup
controls.
Well, you can of course configure limits on individual session
Well, actually I believe you could mess with unit configuration
overrides, couldn't you?
I was experimenting once by giving the user test 1% of cpu using cgroup
controls.
W dniu 06.09.2015 o 16:14, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Thu, 03.09.15 14:57, Benjamin Rose (benr...@math.princeton.edu) wro
Hello.
I have a kvm vps running archlinux with systemd-225, I have just
upgraded systemd and probably restarted most of the systemd components.
I am trying machinectl shell from my ordinary user session over ssh. it
gives me the possibility to authenticate as admin, then says that it
connected
at 11:55 PM, Michał Zegan
wrote:
Seems like this does not apply. I said that terminals do not start, and this
is random, sometimes they do. n_auto_vts = 6.
Can you provide more details about this? How do you reproduce it? What
are you running on your machine? What other graphical and/or text
Unfortunately, SELinux is not namespace/whatever aware and such a setup
is not possible. Unless I suddenly became wrong in this area.
W dniu 23.08.2015 o 14:10, arnaud gaboury pisze:
Here is my setup:
Host: Archlinux systemd 224-1
Container: Fedora 22 systemd 219
The container is a server an
eral plan afaik.
Note that this is already half-broken, because some of those programs
actually *expect* to be unique *per user* – e.g. dconf-daemon for
writing to the dconf db – and having two copies of it in two sessions
might be bad…
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015, 13:36 Michał Zegan &
Hello.
I believe, although may be wrong, that session buses were used to
enforce single instances of programs, like a program registered a name
on dbus and another instance of the same program could not run.
How would it affect user buses in case of multiple graphical user sessions?
__
I may not understand something, but how does it work when I have things
like at-spi2-registryd running on my session? I cannot start one local
and one remote gui session, for example? Of course I mean the user bus.
W dniu 19.08.2015 o 18:13, Simon McVittie pisze:
On 19/08/15 14:12, Mantas Miku
Seems like this does not apply. I said that terminals do not start, and
this is random, sometimes they do. n_auto_vts = 6.
W dniu 18.08.2015 o 20:28, Philip Müller pisze:
Am 18.08.2015 um 20:24 schrieb Michał Zegan:
Hello.
I have the newest arch, systemd version 224.
The thing that I wonder
Hello.
I have the newest arch, systemd version 224.
The thing that I wonder about is that sometimes, when I press
ctrl+alt+f1..f6, ttys do not appear and I do not see the login prompt.
Like there is an initial tty1, but when I start a gui, it is freed.
Other ttys often just do not appear.
___
Well, actually, are things like ip rules never used?
It could be a specific use case, but is this a category of never used
stuff, or legacy stuff? I do not use them myself, but I am curious.
W dniu 16.08.2015 o 15:09, Lennart Poettering pisze:
On Fri, 14.08.15 19:50, Michał Zegan (webczat_
ed entries with efibootmgr.
W dniu 2015-08-14 o 19:45, Mantas Mikulėnas pisze:
> On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 8:42 PM, Michał Zegan
> mailto:webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl>>
> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello.
>
> I was trying to insta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Actually what is a procedure for more complicated network
configuration, where you do not have something in networkd?
W dniu 2015-08-14 o 19:33, Lennart Poettering pisze:
> On Sun, 09.08.15 18:23, Michał Zegan (webczat_...@poczta.onet.pl)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
I was trying to install archlinux with linux 4.1, systemd-224 on the
uefi machine.
At the end of system installation, I issued bootctl install command
from within chroot, but the command has failed because I did not have
access to efi variables
address. Checked/tested.
W dniu 2015-08-09 o 18:21, Tomasz Torcz pisze:
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2015 at 05:58:40PM +0200, Michał Zegan wrote:
>>
>> It seems that systemd-networkd can not handle any kind of
>> advanced network configurations, that is: It cannot handle policy
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello.
It seems that systemd-networkd can not handle any kind of advanced
network configurations, that is:
It cannot handle policy routing and additional routing options like
setting a src address,
It does not ensure address ordering (if I have two ad
1 - 100 of 121 matches
Mail list logo
