[systemd-devel] [PATCH v4] nvme_id utility + support in 60-persistent-storage.rules

2015-05-18 Thread Per Bergqvist
eee1394_id}" KERNEL=="sd*[0-9]", ATTRS{ieee1394_id}=="?*", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/ieee1394-$attr{ieee1394_id}-part%n" diff --git a/src/udev/nvme_id/nvme_id.c b/src/udev/nvme_id/nvme_id.c new file mode 100644 index 000..c61b0b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/udev/nvme_

[systemd-devel] [PATCH v3] nvme_id utility + support in 60-persistent-storage.rules

2015-05-18 Thread Per Bergqvist
eee1394_id}" KERNEL=="sd*[0-9]", ATTRS{ieee1394_id}=="?*", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/ieee1394-$attr{ieee1394_id}-part%n" diff --git a/src/udev/nvme_id/nvme_id.c b/src/udev/nvme_id/nvme_id.c new file mode 100644 index 000..94567b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/udev/nvme_

Re: [systemd-devel] 60-persistent-storage.rules: add NVMe disks and partitions (again)

2015-05-16 Thread Per Bergqvist
as to be changed. Please find the new patch below. BR Per From 6cf318688baead0b4a737cf2c2d7618b6a131954 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Per Bergqvist Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 11:01:17 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] nvme_id following CODING_STYLE --- Makefile.am | 11 +++ rul

Re: [systemd-devel] 60-persistent-storage.rules: add NVMe disks and partitions (again)

2015-05-15 Thread Per Bergqvist
n" + # firewire KERNEL=="sd*[!0-9]|sr*", ATTRS{ieee1394_id}=="?*", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/ieee1394-$attr{ieee1394_id}" KERNEL=="sd*[0-9]", ATTRS{ieee1394_id}=="?*", SYMLINK+="disk/by-id/ieee1394-$attr{ieee1394_id}-part%n" diff --git a/

Re: [systemd-devel] 60-persistent-storage.rules: add NVMe disks and partitions (again)

2015-05-15 Thread Per Bergqvist
OK, now in git-format-patch.BRPer nvme_id.patch Description: Binary data On 15 May 2015, at 17:03 , Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:On Fri, 15.05.15 15:56, Per Bergqvist (p...@bst.lu) wrote:Hej,Seems like nobody thinks using the scsi_id for NVMe drives is a good idea

Re: [systemd-devel] 60-persistent-storage.rules: add NVMe disks and partitions (again)

2015-05-15 Thread Per Bergqvist
5, at 18:12 , Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net> wrote:On Thu, 14.05.15 09:10, Per Bergqvist (p...@bst.lu) wrote:Hej,There was a request for addition of NVMe disks Feb 10 2014 by Harald Hoyer which was sort of rejected by Kay Sievers by referring to “we should find out what to do for nvm

Re: [systemd-devel] 60-persistent-storage.rules: add NVMe disks and partitions (again)

2015-05-14 Thread Per Bergqvist
ication over scsi translation. Is the mmc > way your preferred method for consuming these? If so, can you provide a > pointer in that driver for what they're doing? I can probably get it in > the nvme driver for 4.2. > > Thanks, > Keith > > ____

Re: [systemd-devel] 60-persistent-storage.rules: add NVMe disks and partitions (again)

2015-05-14 Thread Per Bergqvist
Not really the point. I do however prefer to trust an explicit indication in ENV{DEVTYPE} rather than to guess device type based on device naming. And so does the standard scsi rules. BR Per On 14 May 2015, at 9:20 , Robert Milasan wrote: > On Thu, 14 May 2015 09:10:40 +0200 > "Pe

[systemd-devel] 60-persistent-storage.rules: add NVMe disks and partitions (again)

2015-05-14 Thread Per Bergqvist
Hej, There was a request for addition of NVMe disks Feb 10 2014 by Harald Hoyer which was sort of rejected by Kay Sievers by referring to “we should find out what to do for nvme before adding new users of scsi_id”. More than a year later nothing has happened and recent commits actually branch