On 05/16/2018 11:52 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Hence, please go aahead and drop it from the rpm scripts.
Thanks for the clear advice. I filed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579225
to track the removal.
Florian
___
systemd-devel
On Mi, 16.05.18 15:01, Florian Weimer (fwei...@redhat.com) wrote:
> In Fedora, for historic reasons, we run “/sbin/telinit u” after installing a
> new glibc RPM package version.
>
> Does this still make sense? Should we remove the code which invokes telinit
> from the glibc package?
So I am pre
Hi Florian
2018-05-16 15:01 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer :
> In Fedora, for historic reasons, we run “/sbin/telinit u” after installing a
> new glibc RPM package version.
>
> Does this still make sense? Should we remove the code which invokes telinit
> from the glibc package?
We had something simila
Am 16.05.2018 um 15:01 schrieb Florian Weimer:
> In Fedora, for historic reasons, we run “/sbin/telinit u” after
> installing a new glibc RPM package version.
>
> Does this still make sense? Should we remove the code which invokes
> telinit from the glibc package?
how do you come to that concl
In Fedora, for historic reasons, we run “/sbin/telinit u” after
installing a new glibc RPM package version.
Does this still make sense? Should we remove the code which invokes
telinit from the glibc package?
Thanks,
Florian
___
systemd-devel mailin