On Mon, 08.06.15 12:29, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
On Wed, 03.06.15 11:23, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 06:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 02.06.15 11:55, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
We
On Wed, 03.06.15 11:23, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 06:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 02.06.15 11:55, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
We could add another parameter to copy_bytes(), but in this case it's
cleaner to
On Thu, 04.06.15 13:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:23:51AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 06:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 02.06.15 11:55, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
We could add
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 12:29:51PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 04.06.15 13:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:23:51AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 06:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 02.06.15
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 11:23:51AM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 06:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 02.06.15 11:55, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
We could add another parameter to copy_bytes(), but in this case it's
cleaner to call fstat()
On Wed, 2015-06-03 at 06:50 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 02.06.15 11:55, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
We could add another parameter to copy_bytes(), but in this case it's
cleaner to call fstat() and loop_write().
Right. copy_bytes has no concept of
On Tue, 02.06.15 15:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 04:17:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 01.06.15 12:36, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 11:57 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Mon,
On Tue, 02.06.15 11:55, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
We could add another parameter to copy_bytes(), but in this case it's
cleaner to call fstat() and loop_write().
Right. copy_bytes has no concept of rules/records. So either another
parameter is added to copy_bytes to
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 15:28 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 04:17:04PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 01.06.15 12:36, Mimi Zohar (zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 11:57 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 10:36 -0400, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
---
OK, that's strange. Because the error message comes from copy_bytes() failing,
and in copy_bytes() EINVAL could only originate in loop_write(), unless
I'm missing something. Can you check the following patch, which
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 11:57 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 10:36 -0400, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
---
OK, that's strange. Because the error message comes from copy_bytes()
failing,
and in copy_bytes() EINVAL could only originate in loop_write(), unless
I'm
Patchset imported to github.
Pull request:
https://github.com/systemd-devs/systemd/compare/master...systemd-mailing-devs:1433169401-2220-1-git-send-email-zbyszek%40in.waw.pl
--
Generated by https://github.com/haraldh/mail2git
___
systemd-devel mailing
---
OK, that's strange. Because the error message comes from copy_bytes() failing,
and in copy_bytes() EINVAL could only originate in loop_write(), unless
I'm missing something. Can you check the following patch, which essentially
reverts to the old copy method?
Zbyszek
src/core/ima-setup.c |
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 12:36:25PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 11:57 -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-01 at 10:36 -0400, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
---
OK, that's strange. Because the error message comes from copy_bytes()
failing,
and in
14 matches
Mail list logo
