On Tue, 25.03.14 19:11, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> 2014-03-20 20:29 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
> >
> > TO figure out what we can do in Fedora I have now started a discussion
> > on fedora-devel, about getting rid of tcpwrap system-wide. Let's see
> > where this goes. Would be
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> So on Fedora tcpwrap is unlikely to go away soon.
Not necessarily. We just decided this morning in the server working
group that we would only include it if base OS insists:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2014-03-25
2014-03-20 20:29 GMT+01:00 Lennart Poettering :
>
> TO figure out what we can do in Fedora I have now started a discussion
> on fedora-devel, about getting rid of tcpwrap system-wide. Let's see
> where this goes. Would be interested in feedback about this from other
> distros too.
I don't really h
El 24/03/14 16:16, Lennart Poettering escribió:
However, I figure this doesn't have to stop us from killing it in
systemd though, which I now did. This doesn't mean much however, since
people who want tcpwrap support can actually easily restore it by
plugging tcpd into systemd, the same way is t
On Thu, 20.03.14 20:29, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> To figure out what we can do in Fedora I have now started a discussion
> on fedora-devel, about getting rid of tcpwrap system-wide. Let's see
> where this goes. Would be interested in feedback about this from other
> dist
On Mar 20, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> TO figure out what we can do in Fedora I have now started a discussion
> on fedora-devel, about getting rid of tcpwrap system-wide. Let's see
> where this goes. Would be interested in feedback about this from other
> distros too.
Debian has no plans to drop
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 08:29:07PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Thu, 20.03.14 12:49, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
>
> > The underlying components have not seen any upstream activity
> > since 1997 and are not particulary nice either.
> >
> > Those interested in co
El 20/03/14 16:29, Lennart Poettering escribió:
On Thu, 20.03.14 12:49, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
The underlying components have not seen any upstream activity
since 1997 and are not particulary nice either.
Those interested in computer archeology can explicitly use
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:29 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Thu, 20.03.14 12:49, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
>
>> The underlying components have not seen any upstream activity
>> since 1997 and are not particulary nice either.
>>
>> Those interested in computer archeol
On Thu, 20.03.14 12:49, Cristian Rodríguez (crrodrig...@opensuse.org) wrote:
> The underlying components have not seen any upstream activity
> since 1997 and are not particulary nice either.
>
> Those interested in computer archeology can explicitly use --enable-tcpwrap
Is suse intending to drop
The underlying components have not seen any upstream activity
since 1997 and are not particulary nice either.
Those interested in computer archeology can explicitly use --enable-tcpwrap
---
configure.ac | 22 --
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/co
11 matches
Mail list logo
