El jue 31 oct 2013 07:43:54 CLST, Harald Hoyer escribió:
On 10/30/2013 09:25 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El 30/10/13 15:34, Harald Hoyer escribió:
On 10/30/2013 07:27 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
El mié 30 oct 2013 15:18:48 CLST, Tom Gundersen escribió:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Cri
On 10/30/2013 09:25 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El 30/10/13 15:34, Harald Hoyer escribió:
>> On 10/30/2013 07:27 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
>>> El mié 30 oct 2013 15:18:48 CLST, Tom Gundersen escribió:
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> Real executabl
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> El 30/10/13 15:39, Dave Reisner escribió:
>
>> I think Tom meant that /bin would be a symlink to /usr/bin, which
>> implicitly links /bin/mount to /usr/bin/mount.
>
> In openSUSE, /bin is not a symlink to /usr/bin, only executables in th
El 30/10/13 15:39, Dave Reisner escribió:
> I think Tom meant that /bin would be a symlink to /usr/bin, which
> implicitly links /bin/mount to /usr/bin/mount.
In openSUSE, /bin is not a symlink to /usr/bin, only executables in that
directory might be, "mount" is one of them.
>> It is either this
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 03:27:06PM -0300, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El mié 30 oct 2013 15:18:48 CLST, Tom Gundersen escribió:
> > On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
> > wrote:
> >> Real executable might be in /usr and not in /bin
> >
> > I'm not against the patch, but the justif
On 10/30/2013 07:27 PM, Cristian Rodríguez wrote:
> El mié 30 oct 2013 15:18:48 CLST, Tom Gundersen escribió:
>> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
>> wrote:
>>> Real executable might be in /usr and not in /bin
>>
>> I'm not against the patch, but the justification seems lacking..
El mié 30 oct 2013 15:18:48 CLST, Tom Gundersen escribió:
> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
> wrote:
>> Real executable might be in /usr and not in /bin
>
> I'm not against the patch, but the justification seems lacking... Does
> anyone actually do this? I.e., have a mount that
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Cristian Rodríguez
wrote:
> Real executable might be in /usr and not in /bin
I'm not against the patch, but the justification seems lacking... Does
anyone actually do this? I.e., have a mount that is not symlinked to
by /bin/mount?
-t
> ---
> configure.ac
Real executable might be in /usr and not in /bin
---
configure.ac| 4
src/core/mount.c| 4 ++--
src/remount-fs/remount-fs.c | 10 +-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 7e41d57..8ad3c43 100644