https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149069
---
src/core/dbus-manager.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/core/dbus-manager.c b/src/core/dbus-manager.c
index 533ce43..c2d52b2 100644
--- a/src/core/dbus-manager.c
+++ b/src/core/dbus-manager.c
@
On Mon, 06.10.14 13:21, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
Hmm with this change in place we'd have different behaviour for the
cases where systemctl executes the operation client-side, and when it
goes via the bus. We really should keep those differences in behaviour
to a minimum.
I figure
Lennart Poettering writes:
> On Mon, 06.10.14 13:21, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
> Hmm with this change in place we'd have different behaviour for the
> cases where systemctl executes the operation client-side, and when it
> goes via the bus. We really should keep those differences
On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 08:23:32AM +0200, Jan Synacek wrote:
> While I'm at it, what about disable? Should it behave in the same way,
> i.e. return error when the unit is masked? My guess is that yes, but I'm
> not sure.
I don't see a reason why disabling should be disallowed. I think we even
allow
On Tue, 07.10.14 08:23, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Lennart Poettering writes:
> > On Mon, 06.10.14 13:21, Jan Synacek (jsyna...@redhat.com) wrote:
> >
> > Hmm with this change in place we'd have different behaviour for the
> > cases where systemctl executes the operation client-si
