Hey Simon,
Simon McVittie [2015-01-21 14:31 +]:
> systemd currently has
>
> AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([foreign 1.11 -Wall -Wno-portability silent-rules
> tar-pax no-dist-gzip dist-xz subdir-objects])
>
> but Automake 1.11 and 1.12 use the old serial test harness by default.
> That doesn't understand
On 21 January 2015 at 14:31, Simon McVittie
wrote:
> On 20/01/15 20:33, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-01-20 18:23 +]:
>>> With parallel test harness in automake (everyone should have it by
>>> now)
>>
>> Yay, thanks for pointing this out! That makes the whole thing indeed
>>
On 20/01/15 20:33, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-01-20 18:23 +]:
>> With parallel test harness in automake (everyone should have it by
>> now)
>
> Yay, thanks for pointing this out! That makes the whole thing indeed
> much friendlier.
systemd currently has
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE([
Martin Pitt [2015-01-20 16:19 +0100]:
> Thus I think it's high time to write some integration tests for that.
> The attached patch provides the necessary framework and an initial set
> of tests; e. g. test_multiple_provides() covers Michael's recent
> commit b7e71846.
Zbigniew and Thomas generally
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hey Jóhann,
>
> "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" [2015-01-20 17:55 +]:
>> We only provide backwards compatibility with initscript which are lsb
>> compliance and I dont think . ending on a script confirms to
>> that standard hence that test should
Hey Dimitri,
Dimitri John Ledkov [2015-01-20 18:23 +]:
> With parallel test harness in automake (everyone should have it by
> now) you can set custom "runner" of your test, based on extensions,
> e.g. from automake manual:
>
> TESTS = foo.pl bar.py baz
> TEST_EXTENSIONS = .pl .py
> PL_LOG_COM
Hey Jóhann,
"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" [2015-01-20 17:55 +]:
> We only provide backwards compatibility with initscript which are lsb
> compliance and I dont think . ending on a script confirms to
> that standard hence that test should be unnecessary and that initscript be
> fixed upstream as in
On 20 January 2015 at 16:49, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-01-20 16:48 +0100]:
>> Maybe we could do this check in configure.ac/Makefile.am (add the test
>> to the list conditinally)?
>
> Yes, that's a good idea.
>
>> We already test for python presence and extract the vers
On 01/20/2015 03:19 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
initial generic feedback
We only provide backwards compatibility with initscript which are lsb
compliance and I dont think . ending on a script confirms to
that standard hence that test should be unnecessary and that initscript
be fixed upstream a
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek [2015-01-20 16:48 +0100]:
> Maybe we could do this check in configure.ac/Makefile.am (add the test
> to the list conditinally)?
Yes, that's a good idea.
> We already test for python presence and extract the version, so we
> shouldn't duplicate the tests here and have a
On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 04:19:24PM +0100, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We've had numerous problems with the SysV generator in the past, and
> we just recently introduced another regression: init.d scripts which
> end in ".sh" are now totally broken.
>
> Thus I think it's high time to write
Hello all,
We've had numerous problems with the SysV generator in the past, and
we just recently introduced another regression: init.d scripts which
end in ".sh" are now totally broken.
Thus I think it's high time to write some integration tests for that.
The attached patch provides the necessary
12 matches
Mail list logo
