Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> Avoiding conflicting entries seems the best approach here, and the >> first-one-wins, the later ones complain sounds like the best approach. > > Hmmm, fair enough, but I don't see why these should be different to > sysctl.d here. Personally

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-12 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Kay Sievers at 12/09/13 00:22 did gyre and gimble: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> 'Twas brillig, and Mantas Mikulėnas at 11/09/13 22:53 did gyre and gimble: >>> systemd-sysctl gives priority to the latest occurence as of commit >>> 04bf3c1a60d82791e0

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-11 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 4:49 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:14:24AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: >> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Colin Guthrie >> > wrote: >> >> >> I only just rejigged things for the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:14:24AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Colin Guthrie > > wrote: > > >> I only just rejigged things for the last time this flipped around and > >> now sysctl has decided to buck the

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-11 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 1:22 AM, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: >> I only just rejigged things for the last time this flipped around and >> now sysctl has decided to buck the trend of the other tools and follow a >> "later file has priority"? I think

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-11 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 01:22:20AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > > 'Twas brillig, and Mantas Mikulėnas at 11/09/13 22:53 did gyre and gimble: > >> systemd-sysctl gives priority to the latest occurence as of commit > >> 04bf3c1a60d82791e0320381

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-11 Thread Kay Sievers
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:49 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote: > 'Twas brillig, and Mantas Mikulėnas at 11/09/13 22:53 did gyre and gimble: >> systemd-sysctl gives priority to the latest occurence as of commit >> 04bf3c1a60d82791e0320381e9268f727708f776, but the manpage hasn't been >> updated for that. >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-11 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Mantas Mikulėnas at 11/09/13 22:53 did gyre and gimble: > systemd-sysctl gives priority to the latest occurence as of commit > 04bf3c1a60d82791e0320381e9268f727708f776, but the manpage hasn't been > updated for that. Oh jeez... has the ordering flipped again?? I only just rejig

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] man: fix description of sysctl.d order

2013-09-11 Thread Mantas Mikulėnas
systemd-sysctl gives priority to the latest occurence as of commit 04bf3c1a60d82791e0320381e9268f727708f776, but the manpage hasn't been updated for that. --- man/sysctl.d.xml | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/man/sysctl.d.xml b/man/sysctl.d.xml index 69e96ee..ce5