On Mon, Jul 10 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hey Neil,
>
> On 07/04/2017 06:20 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>> On Tue, May 30 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>>
>> For those who aren't cl
Hey Neil,
On 07/04/2017 06:20 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, May 30 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
>
>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>
> For those who aren't closely watching systemd development, a
> patch was rece
On Tue, May 30 2017, NeilBrown wrote:
> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
For those who aren't closely watching systemd development, a
patch was recently accepted which causes systemd to work correctly with
NFS bg
07.06.2017 00:49, NeilBrown пишет:
> On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>> The only problem with this is
On Thu, Jun 08 2017, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 03:16:52PM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>> So I think I've found a solution for systemd to handle "bg" nfs mounts
>> correctly. I'll submit some pull requests for consideration.
>
> Out of curiosity, after that change is there stil
On 06/07/2017 12:08 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 06:04:12AM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> # ps ax | grep mount
>> 980 ?Ss 0:00 /sbin/mount.nfs nfssrv:/home/tmp /mnt/tmp -o rw,bg
>
> Right, but I think we also need to see a "systemctl status
> remote-fs.target
On 06/08/2017 01:16 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> On 06/07/2017 08:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>> On Wed, 07.06.17 06:08, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>>
On 06/06/2017 05:49 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06 2017,
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 8:16 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
> it appears that the fg mount attempt failed quickly (ECONNREFUSED), so it
> background the process immediately. Systemd sees that as success
> (despite the fact that the filesystem isn't actually mounted) and
> doesn't clean up the background pr
On Wed, Jun 07 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
> On 06/07/2017 08:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> On Wed, 07.06.17 06:08, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/06/2017 05:49 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On
On 06/07/2017 08:02 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Wed, 07.06.17 06:08, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 06/06/2017 05:49 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
>>>
Hello,
On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Sy
On Wed, 07.06.17 06:08, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>
> On 06/06/2017 05:49 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
> >
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>
On 06/06/2017 05:49 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>> The only problem with
On 06/07/2017 04:12 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 06.06.17 14:07, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>>
>>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mo
On 06/07/2017 04:13 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 06.06.17 21:57, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> 2017-06-06 20:07 GMT+02:00 Steve Dickson :
>>> Finally, the whole idea of systemd randomly/silently
>>> strip off mount options is crazy... IMHO...
>>
>> Personally, I would p
On Tue, 06.06.17 21:57, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2017-06-06 20:07 GMT+02:00 Steve Dickson :
> > Finally, the whole idea of systemd randomly/silently
> > strip off mount options is crazy... IMHO...
>
> Personally, I would prefer if systemd simply logged a warning/error
> message b
On Tue, 06.06.17 14:07, Steve Dickson (ste...@redhat.com) wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
> > It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
> The only problem with this is bg mounts still w
On Tue, Jun 06 2017, Steve Dickson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>>
>> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
>> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
> The only problem with this is bg mounts still work at least
> up to 4.11 k
2017-06-06 20:07 GMT+02:00 Steve Dickson :
> Finally, the whole idea of systemd randomly/silently
> strip off mount options is crazy... IMHO...
Personally, I would prefer if systemd simply logged a warning/error
message but would *not* strip the bg option.
--
Why is it that all of the instrumen
Hello,
On 05/29/2017 06:19 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
The only problem with this is bg mounts still work at least
up to 4.11 kernel...
It appears there is a problem with a 4.12 ke
On Tue, 30.05.17 11:15, Michael Biebl (mbi...@gmail.com) wrote:
> 2017-05-30 10:55 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown :
> > On Tue, May 30 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >> 2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown :
> >>
> >>> +.B bg
> >>> +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list.
> >>
> >
On Tue, 30.05.17 08:19, NeilBrown (ne...@suse.com) wrote:
>
> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>
> Explain this.
>
> See also https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6046
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
> ---
2017-05-30 10:55 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown :
> On Tue, May 30 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> 2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown :
>>
>>> +.B bg
>>> +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list.
>>
>> Either systemd is updated to actually strip the bg option or not. The
>> document
On Tue, May 30 2017, Michael Biebl wrote:
> 2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown :
>
>> +.B bg
>> +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list.
>
> Either systemd is updated to actually strip the bg option or not. The
> documentation should reflect that.
> I don't think we sho
2017-05-30 0:19 GMT+02:00 NeilBrown :
> +.B bg
> +option is not supported, and may be stripped from the option list.
Either systemd is updated to actually strip the bg option or not. The
documentation should reflect that.
I don't think we should be vague about this, as it would only be confusing.
On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:19:16AM +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
> It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
>
> Explain this.
>
> See also https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6046
>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
> ---
Systemd does not, and will not, support "bg" correctly.
It has other, better, ways to handle "background" mounting.
Explain this.
See also https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6046
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown
---
utils/mount/nfs.man | 18 +-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+),
26 matches
Mail list logo
