On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 06:06:41PM +0100, Ken Werner wrote:
> From: Ken Werner
>
> Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone() system
> call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Applied.
Zbyszek
___
From: Ken Werner
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone() system
call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Signed-off-by: Ken Werner
---
src/nspawn/nspawn.c |6 +++---
src/shared/missing.h | 10 ++
2 files changed, 13 inser
On 12/15/2014 06:27 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 15.12.14 08:01, Ken Werner (k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
From: Ken Werner
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone()
system call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Signed-off-
On Mon, 15.12.14 08:01, Ken Werner (k...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> From: Ken Werner
>
> Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone()
> system call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ken Werner
Hmm, I'd prefer if we co
From: Ken Werner
Since the order of the first and second arguments of the raw clone()
system call is reversed on s390 and cris it needs to be invoked differently.
Signed-off-by: Ken Werner
---
src/nspawn/nspawn.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/s
