Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 12.02.15 11:05, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote: > On 11 February 2015 at 20:51, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Fri, 06.02.15 20:28, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) > > wrote: > > > >> > Hum, we told at the sprint that we wanted to be that ava

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-12 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 February 2015 at 20:51, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 06.02.15 20:28, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) > wrote: > >> > Hum, we told at the sprint that we wanted to be that available for >> > everyone, >> > and not having any conditions. Distros which still desires onl

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-12 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 12.02.15 10:46, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote: > On 11 February 2015 at 20:40, Lennart Poettering > wrote: > > On Thu, 05.02.15 16:11, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) > > wrote: > > > >> Some context for this patch. > >> > >> I would like to sup

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-12 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 February 2015 at 20:49, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Fri, 06.02.15 18:29, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > >> Le 05/02/2015 17:11, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit : >> >Some context for this patch. >> >> Hey Dimitri, thanks for working on that. I'm just giving a broader context >> f

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-12 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 11 February 2015 at 20:40, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Thu, 05.02.15 16:11, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) > wrote: > >> Some context for this patch. >> >> I would like to support a new preset model, which has the following >> properties: >> >> - distribution shipped def

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 06.02.15 20:28, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote: > > Hum, we told at the sprint that we wanted to be that available for everyone, > > and not having any conditions. Distros which still desires only the existing > > behavior would not ship files in *-preset-transient

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 06.02.15 18:29, Didier Roche (didro...@ubuntu.com) wrote: > Le 05/02/2015 17:11, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit : > >Some context for this patch. > > Hey Dimitri, thanks for working on that. I'm just giving a broader context > for everyone who followed the past discussion we had in december/

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-11 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Thu, 05.02.15 16:11, Dimitri John Ledkov (dimitri.j.led...@intel.com) wrote: > Some context for this patch. > > I would like to support a new preset model, which has the following > properties: > > - distribution shipped defaults are enabled > - and are applied to each boot/upgrade > - wi

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-06 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
On 6 February 2015 at 17:29, Didier Roche wrote: > Le 05/02/2015 17:11, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit : >> >> Some context for this patch. > > > Hey Dimitri, thanks for working on that. I'm just giving a broader context > for everyone who followed the past discussion we had in december/january. > >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-06 Thread Didier Roche
Le 05/02/2015 17:11, Dimitri John Ledkov a écrit : Some context for this patch. Hey Dimitri, thanks for working on that. I'm just giving a broader context for everyone who followed the past discussion we had in december/january. This is a followup on our discussion and what we discussed on

[systemd-devel] [PATCH] preset-transient

2015-02-05 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
Some context for this patch. I would like to support a new preset model, which has the following properties: - distribution shipped defaults are enabled - and are applied to each boot/upgrade - without overriding any user configuration In many ways it is very similar to existing functionality