On Sun, 18.01.15 10:53, Shawn Landden (sh...@churchofgit.com) wrote:
> From: Shawn Paul Landden
>
> The current Debian solution to this is really ugly, and I would rather
> have them use the correct patch even if split usr is dumb.
Again, I really don't grok what the point of this is. The right
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 12:52 PM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Landden
> wrote:
> > From: Shawn Paul Landden
> >
> > The current Debian solution to this is really ugly, and I would rather
> > have them use the correct patch even if split usr is dumb.
>
> Please ke
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Shawn Landden wrote:
> From: Shawn Paul Landden
>
> The current Debian solution to this is really ugly, and I would rather
> have them use the correct patch even if split usr is dumb.
Please keep this local to the distro, this is no upstream material.
/etc/timezo
From: Shawn Paul Landden
The current Debian solution to this is really ugly, and I would rather
have them use the correct patch even if split usr is dumb.
Read: http://rusty.ozlabs.org/?p=236
("Why Everyone Must Oppose The Merging of /usr and /")
(I managed to skip the pulseaudio implamentatio
