On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 07:58:43AM -0800, Shawn Landden wrote:
> ---
> src/core/killall.h | 5 +
> src/core/switch-root.h | 5 +
> src/core/syscall-list.h | 5 +
> src/core/transaction.h | 5 +
> src/login/logind-action.h | 5 +
> sr
---
src/core/killall.h | 5 +
src/core/switch-root.h | 5 +
src/core/syscall-list.h | 5 +
src/core/transaction.h | 5 +
src/login/logind-action.h | 5 +
src/login/logind-button.h | 5 +
src/login/logind-inhibit.h | 5
On Wed, 18.07.12 10:07, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> #pragma once has been "un-deprecated" in gcc since 3.3, and is widely
> supported
> in other compilers.
>
> I've been using and maintaining (rebasing) this patch for a while now, as
> it annoyed me to see #ifndef fooblahfoo
El 18/07/12 07:31, Lucas De Marchi escribió:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, 17.07.12 17:14, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm, so I am not completely opposed to this (though
#pragma once has been "un-deprecated" in gcc since 3.3, and is widely supported
in other compilers.
I've been using and maintaining (rebasing) this patch for a while now, as
it annoyed me to see #ifndef fooblahfoo, etc all over the place,
almost arrogant about the annoyance of having to define al
#pragma once has been "un-deprecated" in gcc since 3.3, and is widely supported
in other compilers.
I've been using and maintaining (rebasing) this patch for a while now, as
it annoyed me to see #ifndef fooblahfoo, etc all over the place,
almost arrogant about the annoyance of having to define al
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:47 AM, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17.07.12 17:14, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>> Hmm, so I am not completely opposed to this (though I also don't see the
>> big benefit). But before we
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Tue, 17.07.12 17:14, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hmm, so I am not completely opposed to this (though I also don't see the
> big benefit). But before we merge anything like this: I think the
> externally visible h
On Tue, 17.07.12 17:14, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> #pragma once has been "un-deprecated" in gcc since 3.3, and is widely
> supported
> in other compilers.
>
> I've been using and maintaining (rebasing) this patch for a while now, as
> it annoyed me to see #ifndef fooblahfoo
On 07/18/2012 02:14 AM, Shawn Landden wrote:
> #pragma once has been "un-deprecated" in gcc since 3.3, and is widely
> supported
> in other compilers.
> 101 files changed, 101 insertions(+), 403 deletions(-)
Looking at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pragma_once#Portability, this
doesn't seem lik
#pragma once has been "un-deprecated" in gcc since 3.3, and is widely supported
in other compilers.
I've been using and maintaining (rebasing) this patch for a while now, as
it annoyed me to see #ifndef fooblahfoo, etc all over the place,
almost arrogant about the annoyance of having to define al
11 matches
Mail list logo
