Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] systemd and watchdog

2011-10-12 Thread Kay Sievers
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 15:12, Michael Olbrich wrote: > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:59:14PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: >> What do you think? > > No comments at all? I realize, that this is not a topic that is relevant > for most people. But maybe I could get some feedback if anything like this >

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] systemd and watchdog

2011-10-12 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 06:59:14PM +0200, Michael Olbrich wrote: > What do you think? No comments at all? I realize, that this is not a topic that is relevant for most people. But maybe I could get some feedback if anything like this has a chance to be merged at all, or if I should work on a

Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] systemd and watchdog

2011-09-28 Thread Albert Strasheim
Hello On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Michael Olbrich wrote: > How to implement this is systemd: > systemd already has the concept of a state for each service and a very > simple method (sd_notify) for the service to provide status information to > systemd. > This is implemented in the first pat

[systemd-devel] [PATCH 0/4] systemd and watchdog

2011-09-28 Thread Michael Olbrich
Hi, I've been playing with some ideas on how to add watchdog support to systemd. I don't like talking about vaporware so here are some patches with a prototype implementation. It should give you an idea on how this could be done. A few words on the ideas behind this: When working with a watchdog