Am 09.04.2015 um 19:05 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file sy
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:58 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
>> wrote:
>>
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file system like ext234 is clearly
Am 09.04.2015 um 18:52 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
past. A file system like ext234 is clearly not the future,
A filesystem like ext is being actively developed,mainta
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:02 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
wrote:
>> We generally follow the rule: we develop for the future, not for the
>> past. A file system like ext234 is clearly not the future,
>
> A filesystem like ext is being actively developed,maintained and new
> features being added to i
On 04/09/2015 11:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 09.04.15 10:51, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
My above questions where directed directly at Lennart since you cannot know
if Lennart's assumption which he bases his decisions on are
premature,correct, wrong or misgu
On Thu, 09.04.15 10:51, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (johan...@gmail.com) wrote:
> My above questions where directed directly at Lennart since you cannot know
> if Lennart's assumption which he bases his decisions on are
> premature,correct, wrong or misguided until you know what those assumptions
> are.
On 04/09/2015 10:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.04.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
wort
Am 09.04.2015 um 12:17 schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
worth it... Actually neither xfs nor btrfs nor reise
On 04/09/2015 08:54 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Of course, this only works for GPT systems, i.e. modern systems, and
modern systems probably wouldn't run ext234 anyway, so maybe it's not
worth it... Actually neither xfs nor btrfs nor reiserfs appear to
require an fsck still, it's only ext234 an
On Sun, 15.03.15 21:30, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> So this used to to be possible for ext4, by setting "mount count" one
> below the "mount limit". But "mount limit" now defaults to disabled, so
> this stopped being possible.
>
> Also, this suffers from the same prob
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 9:15 AM, Jan Janssen wrote:
>> Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. März 2015 um 19:58 Uhr
>> Nobody would write to the flash on kernel updates, we only possibly
>> write to the ESP filesystem. The flash is not meant for such use
>> cases, it is known to brick all sorts of machines, and
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 15. März 2015 um 19:58 Uhr
> Von: "Kay Sievers"
> An: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek"
> Cc: "Jan Janssen" , systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
> Betreff: Re: [systemd-devel] [PATCH 2/2] fsck: Add support for EFI variable
> b
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 08:50:03PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> If the filesytem is too dumb to have that info in the superblock flags
> >> to store, to reques
Am 15.03.2015 um 20:50 schrieb Kay Sievers:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
If the filesytem is too dumb to have that info in the superblock flags
to store, to request a forced fsck, it is the pro
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 8:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> If the filesytem is too dumb to have that info in the superblock flags
>> to store, to request a forced fsck, it is the problem of the file
>> system to fix and not
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 07:58:35PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> If the filesytem is too dumb to have that info in the superblock flags
> to store, to request a forced fsck, it is the problem of the file
> system to fix and nothing we need to solve in systemd.
Are there filesystems which have such a
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:59 PM, Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> В Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:48:10 +0100
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет:
>> > No, they are absolutely not. Changing the EFI flash comes with
>> > unpredictable risks, the flash is not meant to or designed for be
>> > written to during any
В Sun, 15 Mar 2015 19:48:10 +0100
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek пишет:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > wrote:
> > > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > >> On Sun, Mar 15
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 7:48 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> It is legacy and does not need new features. It worked in the past and
>> will continue to work in the future, but it does not need new
>> questionable and possibl
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 06:48:24PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> >> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jan Janssen wrote:
> >> > ---
> >> > man/systemctl.xml
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 4:44 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jan Janssen wrote:
>> > ---
>> > man/systemctl.xml | 26
>> > shell-completion/bash/systemctl.
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jan Janssen wrote:
> > ---
> > man/systemctl.xml | 26
> > shell-completion/bash/systemctl.in | 8 -
> > shell-completion/zsh/_systemctl.in | 2 ++
> > src/fsck
On Sun, Mar 15, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Jan Janssen wrote:
> ---
> man/systemctl.xml | 26
> shell-completion/bash/systemctl.in | 8 -
> shell-completion/zsh/_systemctl.in | 2 ++
> src/fsck/fsck.c| 63 +
>
---
man/systemctl.xml | 26
shell-completion/bash/systemctl.in | 8 -
shell-completion/zsh/_systemctl.in | 2 ++
src/fsck/fsck.c| 63 +
src/shared/efivars.h | 21 +++--
src/systemc
24 matches
Mail list logo
