On Tue, 23.10.12 18:52, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 05:48:57PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
> > wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19.10.12 00:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > >
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 05:48:57PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
> > On Fri, 19.10.12 00:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl)
> > wrote:
> >
> >> A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a
> >> sing
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Fri, 19.10.12 00:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
>> A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a
>> single unit with multiple names.
>>
>> The idea is to simplify things for the user
On Fri, 19.10.12 00:56, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
> A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a
> single unit with multiple names.
>
> The idea is to simplify things for the user: only one swap unit per
> swap area. It shouldn't matter whether
On 10/19/12 11:24, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:06:03AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 18/10/12 23:56 did
>> gyre and gimble:
>>> A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a
>>> single uni
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 10:06:03AM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 18/10/12 23:56 did
> gyre and gimble:
> > A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a
> > single unit with multiple names.
> >
> > The idea is to simplify thin
'Twas brillig, and Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek at 18/10/12 23:56 did
gyre and gimble:
> A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a
> single unit with multiple names.
>
> The idea is to simplify things for the user: only one swap unit per
> swap area. It shouldn't matter wh
A series of .swap units "following" one another are replaced with a
single unit with multiple names.
The idea is to simplify things for the user: only one swap unit per
swap area. It shouldn't matter whether the swap area was activated by
systemd or by direct swapon invocation. The kernel name (fr
