On Fri, 12.07.13 18:38, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 06:00:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Fri, 12.07.13 08:42, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > > as most (if not all) of the prefix strings are static, these
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 06:00:38PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Fri, 12.07.13 08:42, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > as most (if not all) of the prefix strings are static, these will get
> > forward constant propagation optimized into single memcmp() calls, which
> > s
On Fri, 12.07.13 08:42, Shawn Landden (shawnland...@gmail.com) wrote:
> as most (if not all) of the prefix strings are static, these will get
> forward constant propagation optimized into single memcmp() calls, which
> should be much better than the non-SIMD hand-rolled version.
They are function
as most (if not all) of the prefix strings are static, these will get
forward constant propagation optimized into single memcmp() calls, which
should be much better than the non-SIMD hand-rolled version.
---
TODO | 2 --
src/journal/journal-send.c | 2 +-
src/journa