Yes im still working on it (Should have been finished days ago. 24 hours a
day is again not enough -.-). So far i went for the threaded version, and
cleaned up stuff according to this mail thread.
And i updated it to match systemd with c99 null initialisation of structs
etc. That might be wrong
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 11.12.13 02:13, Daniel Buch (boogiewasth...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, so thinking about it I have the suspicion this should probably be
linked into libsystemd-bus, and thus live in
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 11.12.13 02:13, Daniel Buch (boogiewasth...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, so thinking about it I have the suspicion this should
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:53 PM, Tom Gundersen t...@jklm.no wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Lennart Poettering lenn...@poettering.net
wrote:
To follow the naming scheme of the other libs we should probably call
this sd-asyncs.c, and the header file should be in src/systemd/
together
Just to consider what other folks are doing, I know Fedora builds
libcurl with a thread-isolated, NSS-based resolver.
On a less-related note, at Pantheon improve DNS performance on servers
by setting resolv.conf to localhost and running Unbound there. Unbound
then uses the datacenter's recursive
Hi Lennart,
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
Well, we don't fork threads/processes for each call but reuse them.
What
В Thu, 12 Dec 2013 14:09:42 +0100
Marcel Holtmann mar...@holtmann.org пишет:
Hi Lennart,
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
On Thu, 12.12.13 14:09, Marcel Holtmann (mar...@holtmann.org) wrote:
Hi Lennart,
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
Hi Andrey,
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
Well, we don't fork threads/processes for each call but reuse them.
What
On Thu, 12.12.13 15:20, Marcel Holtmann (mar...@holtmann.org) wrote:
Hi Andrey,
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
Hi Lennart,
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
Well, we don't fork threads/processes for each call but reuse them.
What
On Thu, 12.12.13 16:28, Marcel Holtmann (mar...@holtmann.org) wrote:
Hi Lennart,
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Lennart Poettering
lenn...@poettering.net wrote:
On Wed, 11.12.13 02:13, Daniel Buch (boogiewasth...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, so thinking about it I have the suspicion this should probably be
linked into libsystemd-bus, and thus live in
Hi Daniel,
Reindentation is done to fit systemd
---
Makefile.am | 23 +
src/libsystemd-asyncns/asyncns.c | 1513 +
src/libsystemd-asyncns/asyncns.h | 163
src/libsystemd-asyncns/test-asyncns.c | 178
4 files
On Wed, 11.12.13 02:13, Daniel Buch (boogiewasth...@gmail.com) wrote:
Heya,
Hmm, so thinking about it I have the suspicion this should probably be
linked into libsystemd-bus, and thus live in src/libsystemd-bus/. The
reason for this is cyclic deps: libsystemd-bus really should make use of
this
On Wed, 11.12.13 02:36, Marcel Holtmann (mar...@holtmann.org) wrote:
why do we have to spawn threads or do forks for DNS. This looks all
pretty expensive. In ConnMan for example we just wrote our own async
DNS using a mainloop. Works perfectly fine and is dirt cheap.
Well, we don't fork
16 matches
Mail list logo
