Cool, thanks you for the very decent reply.. I will work on this the next
few days, you can then expect some new RFC's :)
2013/12/11 Lennart Poettering
> On Wed, 11.12.13 02:18, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
>
> > > C99 or C89? Do we want it to be public or private?
> >
> >
On Wed, 11.12.13 02:18, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote:
> > C99 or C89? Do we want it to be public or private?
>
> Internally we use C99 and a lot of gcc extensions.
>
> Externally we limit ourselves to C89.
>
> One effect of this is that internally we use the C99 bool type
On Wed, 11.12.13 02:13, Daniel Buch (boogiewasth...@gmail.com) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So i layed the foundation of this libary to fit systemd
>
> But what is actually desired?
>
> C99 or C89? Do we want it to be public or private?
Internally we use C99 and a lot of gcc extensions.
Externally we li
Hi,
So i layed the foundation of this libary to fit systemd
But what is actually desired?
C99 or C89? Do we want it to be public or private? Is modernization desired?
Daniel Buch (1):
Initial libsystemd-asyncns commit
Makefile.am | 23 +
src/libsystemd-asyncns/as
